Y da Swac isn't elgible for Bowl Game?


Status
Not open for further replies.
Robber,

Excellent Point!!

Major095,



Often times the difference the athletic operating budget is a factor of school enrollment. I believe many of us assume that if a program is Division I Football Championship Subdivision (formerly I-AA) level that the schools are similar in enrollment size. One should also factor into the equations the economic disparity in the HBCU student body base and our regional PWC counterparts. Every HBCU in the SWAC has at least 59.6% of the undergraduate students qualifying for Federal Pell Grants in the 2004-05 academic year. Mississippi Valley State in fact has 98.7%. It would be difficult to ask this student body base to increase their tuition fees to support athletics.

in some cases though the state itself has worked to steer students away from our institutions. the discrimination case that had been brought against the state of alabama just ended. they founded Auburn University Montgomery (AUM) and the University of Alabama Huntsville (UAH) so that majority students would have to go to the only state supported schools in the area, bama state and aamu. in fact, they duplicated every program the hbcu's had so that whites wouldn't go to our schools. as well, they would change the funding formula often so that funds wouldn't find their way to state supported hbcu's. i believe there was a similiar situation in mississippi. so in fact enrollment may play a large factor in budgeting but that hasn't been all our fault. as for the problem w/ financial aid.....ur probably right that it's not appropriate to raise fees to support athletics. my problem w/ the students is most of our schools allow students to get in free and they just don't show up. I know times have changed and entertainment options have exploded but their is an apathy that seems to effect most of our campuses in regard to athletics. This, I believe, is in part b/c we are no longer what we used to be.

anyone got an answer on my grambling question?
 
they may have 15K students and so but alot of Southland students (maybe McNeese) don't take to football like the average PWC student in I-A. Alot of those students there wanted to get into the big state school but couldn't get in for various reasons and end up there....trust me..you walk on a Texas campus in the Southland and you'll see more UT stuff displayed PROUDLY...

our problems is that we have the fanbase to draw big and support a program week-in and week-out but we as a whole put people in leadership positions without much athletic knowledge.

For example...Texas Southern...

you got 4 million people in a city, had a generous budget to do damage in the SWAC, but to this day, still remains a laughingstock because there never has been stable, legitimate leadership to take the program to the next level. It's 2006 and it feels like 1986 over there with the moves they've made personnel wise....they should also have a generous slush fund with all those corportations 2 miles away but you got to hire a proven fundraiser to do that.

Same with PV....the location at the time has hampered them but with Houston moving that way and with the woes at TSU, it's time to become the state's "choice" of preferred HBCUs.

Another thing, we have too many disgruntled alums who graduate and never associate with their alma maters ever. They blame one thing and hold that over the school's head forever and it trickles down to the kids.

We also have too many uninformed alums who know NOTHING of what's going on at their schools. It's pitiful when you have alums who went to a school 4 years and still don't remember the weekend of the biggest rivalry game.

It all comes down to personnel of the schools.......you got to make outside the box hires and decisions at times to shake things up. One thing people notice is change......

HBCUs have unlimited potential because we are unique and have a product worth watching for now. A strong Southland school can only go so far even in a 1-A move.
 



If I recall correctly, Grand Valley State, the 2006 Division 2 Champion in football has an enrollment of 23,295.

Their athletic budget is said to be more than five million dollars.
You'd think they'd qualify to be a D-1 school.
I guess they're not interested.
 
... this week here in Jackson, MS....We have the Magnolia Grin Iron Classic this Saturday.......We have kids from all over from Divsion I-A and I-AA....

Check it out the rooster........
http://www.magnoliagridironclassic.com/rosters_2006.php

The Magnolia Grid Iron Classic is an innovative game concept that will allow prospects from Division I-A programs to participate in a contest against a small school roster comprised of Division I-AA, Division II and other players. It gives many non-bowl game seniors and smaller school players a final game to impress NFL teams.

SWAC is well repped........

These guys are going out in front of several NFL agents and scouts and hope they are picked up!!!!

Alcorn
21 WR Spiller, Charlie
35 FB Williams, Kenneth

Jackson State
22 CB Brown, Carlton
6 SS Dancy, Vincent
1 RB Pittman, Jamal
41 OLB Woodard, Kenneth

Southern University
60 LG Tatum, Wyatt

Grambling State
75 LT Governor, Derrek

MS Valley
12 QB Nelson, Aries

Alabama State
10 WR Hoffman, Lorenzo

Alabama A&M
57 OLB Baldwin, Johnny
95 DT Lockhart, Kevin

Great post, 1SGT! Thanks for the info on the Magnolia Classic. What a great idea :nod:
 
Alot of those students there wanted to get into the big state school but couldn't get in for various reasons and end up there....

I heard the same thing at JSU when I was there (in the 80's). The more masta' lets into his schools and we accept him with open arms, the weaker the conference becomes. I just don't understand why black folks want to attende schools like Ole Miss in the first place for undergrad. People in that enviroment say that it's ok, but our schools suffer in the end. It's a DIRECT correlation. That's my perspective.

We also need stop making more out of our athletic departments than they what they really are. If it's sorry, deal with it and try to improve it. Don't view it with rose colored glasses and not adress the issues, it will only get worst.
 
The Band Fan,

they may have 15K students and so but alot of Southland students (maybe McNeese) don't take to football like the average PWC student in I-A. Alot of those students there wanted to get into the big state school but couldn't get in for various reasons and end up there....trust me..you walk on a Texas campus in the Southland and you'll see more UT stuff displayed PROUDLY...

I respectfully disagree. In terms of an athletic operating budget, it does not matter why student enrollment is at the school because if the student body is taking classes their student fees are allocated to the university?s budget. I agree in terms of a residual affect it may make a difference in terms of attendance in various facets. But consider this. We have studies that suggest that our regional PWC alums give at a higher rate than our HBCU alums, but even if we do not take the regional PWC alums giving rates into consideration.

So even if you have only 5% of a graduating PWC regional institution class for a semester of 900 students of a 13,000 enrollment versus 10% of a graduating HBCU institution class for a semester of 400 students of a 6,000 enrollment. That is a 45 PWC giving versus 40 HBCU. One can view that these numbers explode exponentially over a period time.

our problems is that we have the fanbase to draw big and support a program week-in and week-out but we as a whole put people in leadership positions without much athletic knowledge.

For example...Texas Southern...

you got 4 million people in a city, had a generous budget to do damage in the SWAC, but to this day, still remains a laughingstock because there never has been stable, legitimate leadership to take the program to the next level. It's 2006 and it feels like 1986 over there with the moves they've made personnel wise....they should also have a generous slush fund with all those corportations 2 miles away but you got to hire a proven fundraiser to do that.

Same with PV....the location at the time has hampered them but with Houston moving that way and with the woes at TSU, it's time to become the state's "choice" of preferred HBCUs.

Again, I think it is inappropriate to compare Texas Southern University?s athletic operating budget, once you compare the mean average athletic operating budget in the SWAC with Texas Southern University having the largest enrollment in the SWAC.

Another thing, we have too many disgruntled alums who graduate and never associate with their alma maters ever. They blame one thing and hold that over the school's head forever and it trickles down to the kids.

We also have too many uninformed alums who know NOTHING of what's going on at their schools. It's pitiful when you have alums who went to a school 4 years and still don't remember the weekend of the biggest rivalry game.

It all comes down to personnel of the schools.......you got to make outside the box hires and decisions at times to shake things up. One thing people notice is change......

HBCUs have unlimited potential because we are unique and have a product worth watching for now. A strong Southland school can only go so far even in a 1-A move.

Interesting!!
 
Re: What about independents?

Robber, you have to understand the situation that Birmingham is in. Remember they used to host the SEC Championship game, though the SEC is still headquartered in Birmingham. Losing the SEC Championship game coupled with the Iron Bowl, the city of Birmingham has been making strides to make sure they don't fall by the wayside and make the same mistake twice (ATL Airport). They recognize that Birmingham could have been what Atlanta is today. They are being proactive now. That's the reason for their aggressive offering they made to the SWAC that basically (you can't refuse). Birmingham is trying to position itself as a top city in the country. You hear about their names every so often about trying to get pro teams (Minn. Vikings franchise for example, XFL). Truth be told Birmingham has been GREAT to the SWAC. Comm. Vowels said so in the article posted. There is not many conferences out there that have as good a relationship with their HQ city as does the SWAC with Birmingham.

I realize that there are not a lot of independents left, but do they get figured into the BCS distributions like the conferences? If so, how is that done? I did not find a reference to them in the article referenced earlier.

dacontinent, this link should help you out some. ND will receive $4.5 Million from the BCS.
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/2006-12-06-bowl-payouts_x.htm
 
Here's another side of the debate.

If B'ham's offering all those free amenities to the SWAC, then keep the headquarters there, UNLESS Jackson can offer a (half-way ) similar deal, which they've been trying to work out for some time. I'll explain the half-way part later.
If Jackson puts together a (has to be) better or equal package for the SWAC, I'll be for the SWAC taking that offer. I'm not using any bias. This is a BUSINESS decision. We have to make money.

My point is that the game needs to be moved FOR THE FANS benefit. What benefit exactly are you talking about. The SEC Championship was in Birmingham (which was centrally located for the SEC), but moved to Atlanta (which is on the FAR EAST side of the SEC, and IS NOT A SEC CITY) for business money/business purposes. Where is it a written rule that the conference championship must be centrally located?
My primary concern is for the SCG, though.
My concern is for the SCG as well, but you are not making valid arguements to warrant a move.

The number of fans attending the game in Jackson should easily offset whatever B'ham is offering. Again, facts and figures please. How can you be so sure?
40,000 fans at 25 dollar tickets equals 1,000,000 dollars off the top. This doesn't include SWAC paraphanalia, concessions, etc. First, that wouldn't be the figure. Tickets are $15 for students, $20 early, and $25 the day of the game. A more accurate count would be 40,000 x $20=$800,000. Right now, (not definate), but the SWAC got $600K off of ticket sales. If you add in the expenses that Jackson already charges you don't make much of a difference in profit (if any), because JSU has a deal with Memorial. The SWAC does not. The number of Bama fans also probably falls off a little.

JSU only pays 15,000 dollars per game for rental of the stadium. The city could easily offset that cost. 15,000 dollar's a drop in the bucket compared to 1,000,000 dollars. See above statement.

You say that B'ham gives the SWAC FREE use of AN ENTIRE BUILDING for office space for SWAC HQ, free use of sporting venues for championship game(s) in basketball, football and baseball.
Birmingham budgeted about $550,000 to GIVE to the SWAC last fiscal year.

Mr. SWAC, all of that's fine and dandy and it sounds good, but the city of B'ham makes far more than that off the fans. And this is a bad thing because?...
When people make it to town, they're going to go to restaurants, rent cars, buy gas, hotel rooms, go to bars and clubs, Greek shows, movies, etc.
That money doesn't benefit the SWAC, it benefits B'ham. This is not an arguement. This is not even a bad thing. Most glaringly obvious is that this will happen if the game is in Jackson as well. Not sure what you tried to prove here......
So those "free" amenities that you mentioned aren't that expensive when you look at the totality of what B'ham pulls in financially for that weekend.
Like you said yourself, YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT JACKSON IS OFFERING. So how can you say this for sure? Let's deal with reality. When the SWAC was in New Orleans, we were not making money. The conference was (if my memory serves correctly) in the hole. Jafas may be able to say for sure.

I mentioned some of the advantages of having the game in Jackson in an earlier post, so I'll do it again.

Why in the heck should we reward a city which doesn't cater to the SWAC until the SCG or until the MCC come around? See, now you are going back to talking out of your ass. How possibly is the city of Birmingham not catering to the SWAC? Birmingham has showed true interest in the SWAC, and the most interest out of the rest of the cities. If you ask me, B-ham cares more about the SWAC than N.O./Shreveport/Jackson, etc. because before the move there, other other packages weren't "sweet deals" in their own right.

Every year, at least 5-6 HBCU schools play IN Jackson.Even more play IN Bham each year (Miles, Stillman, Hampton, Grambling, Alabama A&M, Alabama State, Tennessee State, and UAPB). When grambing, su, alcorn and other schools come to Jackson, we roll the red carpet out for them. What about when AAMU, Alabama State, our UAPB come to Jackson? Where is the "red carpet" treatment then? They enjoy themselves for the most part, and most will be back home in less than three hours, whether they choose to spend the night or not. If they are within 3 hours from home, chances are they are not staying the night. BAD for Jackson. Possibly more expenses Jackson imposes on the SWAC.
The same fans usually spend big money by renting hotels, dining out in restaurants, car rentals, clubs, bars, shopping, game paraphanalia, etc. You have got to come to accept that the SWAC is not SU, JSU, GSU, or even Alcorn any more. UAPB fans don't seem to care where the SCG is located and they spend just as much money as any of the traditional fans you are referring to.

Here's another tremendous advantage.
If you want to have a battle of the bands, bands wouldn't have to travel as far. That saves even more money for the schools. More than likely, they probably wouldn't have to spend the night, so that's even more money saved from hotel costs and breakfast. Well if you would know, for the championship game, both schools' bands spend the night regardless of proximity. AAMU's band spends the night in Birmingham, Alabama States band spends the night in Birmingham, and JSU's band (when they made it) spent the night in Birmingham. This is what sponsors and all else pay for, and the city you are in greatly affects sponsorhip. The Sonic Boom would be the only exception in Jackson's case, and historically that scenario would not have occured yet.

Jackson has the history, the experience, the fans, the facilities, the hotels, the location, and it's 70 percent Black. And Birmingham doesn't? Jackson is 1/3 the size of Birmingham as well. Number of blacks in the city is about the same. DAHILL, can tell you better than I, but I think B-ham is like 50/50 black and white.
Even the saints had their training facility IN Jackson and played at Memorial Stadium to a sellout crowd, AND they're scheduled to do so again next year. I'll get to this at the end.

If Jackson's good enough for an NFL team, isn't it good enough for the SCG?
The newspapers, sports stations, news stations, local radio stations always give JSU, valley and alcorn publicity throughout the football season. Even when they're not playing the papers and reporters give them props.
They'll give that same publicity to the SCG, virtually free of charge.
What more does a city need?? Who do you think you're fooling. Jackson is not an Alcorn or Valley city. They only get mentioned when they are in the city of Jackson or for the sports write up in Sunday's paper. The Huntsville Times gives each SWAC team publicity throughout the football season.

B'ham might give the mcc a bit of publicity, along with the SCG, but what about the rest of the football year? The city is not going to do write ups for something it is not associated with unless it somehow is of interest or effects that city. Do this for me. Show me ONE (1) article from the Clarion Ledger leading up to the SCG in Birmingham this year that "pubs up" the SWAC Championship Game.
The B'ham people could care less about a SWAC school. Speeking out of your ass here too. Do you live in Birmingham? Did you have a conversation with someone from Birmingham about what they feel about the SWAC? If the MEAC/SWAC Challenge was held in Jackson, Ms. last year and Jackson State had a game in another state. How many people would have been at the MEAC/SWAC Challenge? Honestly.
They utilize the SWAC only when they need to.

Jackson's NOT a one or two event wonder like B'ham.

Jackson's an HBCU multi-event wonder and bends over backwards to cater to SWAC schools and it's a great host for all HBCU schools. Examples please, 'cause I clearly missed this part. Y'all still getting screwed by Memorial, and THEY are the ones bending over?:goof: lol
When su, grambing, alcorn and other teams come to Jackson, they enjoy themselves without hassle or harassment from police officers. A DAMN LIE! Sonic Boom bandmembers were just in a ruccus with JPD not even 2 years ago. I believe the headline was, "Sonic Boom Assaulted by Jackson PD". Seriously, this happened.

If you want to keep the headquarters in B'ham, so be it, but the overall cost benefits seem to favor Jackson, especially if it could work out a package half-way similar (not better), to the package offered by B'ham.

Also when there are mandatory appearance meetings for SWAC Presidents, coaches, athletic directors, etc, they have to fly all the way to B'ham. That's more time and cost to the schools for travel expenses. Jackson's more local and cost effective for them as well. Uhh, dude....... We are in the 21st century here. There is this new technology out hitting the streets called a "telephone". :emlaugh: I think they've found out about CONFERENCE CALLS by now. Dude nobody does that isht no more. You really reached on that one.:o

Again, it's a win-win situation if either or both the headquarters and SCG are moved to Jackson, along with the other championship games in basketball and baseball.:nod: :nod:

Okay, let's say the SCG is moved to Jackson. 40,000 fans show up to the game as predicted. The official attendance couts says 30,000 (and this will happen). What do we do then? Go ahead and marinate on that for a minute.:whatever:
 
they may have 15K students and so but alot of Southland students (maybe McNeese) don't take to football like the average PWC student in I-A. Alot of those students there wanted to get into the big state school but couldn't get in for various reasons and end up there....trust me..you walk on a Texas campus in the Southland and you'll see more UT stuff displayed PROUDLY...

our problems is that we have the fanbase to draw big and support a program week-in and week-out but we as a whole put people in leadership positions without much athletic knowledge.

For example...Texas Southern...

you got 4 million people in a city, had a generous budget to do damage in the SWAC, but to this day, still remains a laughingstock because there never has been stable, legitimate leadership to take the program to the next level. It's 2006 and it feels like 1986 over there with the moves they've made personnel wise....they should also have a generous slush fund with all those corportations 2 miles away but you got to hire a proven fundraiser to do that.

Same with PV....the location at the time has hampered them but with Houston moving that way and with the woes at TSU, it's time to become the state's "choice" of preferred HBCUs.

Another thing, we have too many disgruntled alums who graduate and never associate with their alma maters ever. They blame one thing and hold that over the school's head forever and it trickles down to the kids.

We also have too many uninformed alums who know NOTHING of what's going on at their schools. It's pitiful when you have alums who went to a school 4 years and still don't remember the weekend of the biggest rivalry game.

It all comes down to personnel of the schools.......you got to make outside the box hires and decisions at times to shake things up. One thing people notice is change......

HBCUs have unlimited potential because we are unique and have a product worth watching for now. A strong Southland school can only go so far even in a 1-A move.

Good points, band fan. It is noteworthy that few Div I football programs prosper when co-located with an NFL franchise. It's not just HBCUs whose football programs suffer in large metropolitan areas with a professional football team. San Diego State has been a laughing stock for the past few years, and attendance has been dismal.
 
Mr.Swac good post, I guess he's still marinating!!

blownup, some of us don't wake up as early on Sunday as you do, besides uapb fans were just happy to be in B'ham. If the SCG was on the moon, y'all probably would've still booked a flight. I'm sure y'all would rather drive 3-4 hours rather than 8 hours.

Now, back to the subject at hand.
Mr. SWAC, I'll put my scenario up against yours any day.
You're beatin a dead horse and you're flat out in denial. Ain't nobody gone drive 5,6, 7 or 8 hours to see a game, especially when their team's not in it.
Wake up and smell the coffee.

I'm primarily referring to the SCG. If you want your headquarters in B'ham, so be it, but let the SCG be in a centralized location. It doesn't have to be Jackson. Just make it more convenient for the players, fans, bands, etc.
That's all I'm saying.
--You say the SCG is a business? Well for most businesses, isn't LOCATION, along with the contract most important?
Location for not only the SCG, but for basketball and baseball as well.
Add gas costs for travel for all parties involved, that ALONE may offset what B'ham's offering in incentives.
--Why did the SEC leave B'ham? One of the reasons was due to the rundown conditions of Legion Field. It needs a major upgrade.
--800,000 dollars is still a lot more than 15,000 dollars no matter how you slice it.
--I only mentioned the B'ham police because one of the posters mentioned it. That's not a problem at all in Jackson. The one incident you mentioned out of the hundreds of times JSU's played at Memorial proves my point even more.
--You say that coaches don't meet in B'ham anymore? Where do you get your information from? Now who's talking out of his azz?
Take note:
"The SWAC Media Luncheon will be held on Friday, July 28, 2006 at the Birmingham Downtown Sheraton Hotel. During the luncheon there will be presentations by all ten SWAC coaches, as well as the announcement of 2006 Preseason All-SWAC Football team and predicted order of finish."
--Your comment about Memorial is used to mislead people. Memorial only counts tickets, they don't count student ID's or those who get in some other way. Even though many would like for them to have two attendance numbers, they don't have paid total and overall total attendance.

Again Mr. SWAC, if y'all want to keep the headquarters in B'ham, go ahead, be my guest, I'm mainly concerned about the SCG.

If the SCG is to be great, B'ham's had their shot to make it great. As of now they've failed and they've not produced. It's time to give another city a shot at it, whether it's Jackson or another city that's convenient for most SWAC fans.
 
I have said this fact before several times........

At the 2006 MEAC-SWAC game which was played at Legion Field during Labor Day weekend...No games where going on and it only drew about 19,175 or so fans, etc....

I asked what was going on and a fan told me this statement.....


"If Alabama State or Alabama A&M ARE NOT playing here at Legion Field....
Then whatever game WILL NOT get support by the fans of Birmingham"...

Then all of the sudden...2006 Magic City Classic...AAMU and Alabama State and it produced over 66,233 fans !!!! WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Fast FoWard...2006 SWAC Championship in B'Ham...Drew only 30,213 UAPB and AAMU......

There needs to be some major input that goes to the SWAC main office and think on the 2007 Championship.....

In closing...The Biggest fact..The date needs to be changed !!!!!!!!!
It was TOO CLOSE to Christmas...


I suggest the 1st Saturday in December!!!!!
 
I have said this fact before several times........

At the 2006 MEAC-SWAC game which was played at Legion Field during Labor Day weekend...No games where going on and it only drew about 19,175 or so fans, etc....

I asked what was going on and a fan told me this statement.....


"If Alabama State or Alabama A&M ARE NOT playing here at Legion Field....
Then whatever game WILL NOT get support by the fans of Birmingham"...

Then all of the sudden...2006 Magic City Classic...AAMU and Alabama State and it produced over 66,233 fans !!!! WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Fast FoWard...2006 SWAC Championship in B'Ham...Drew only 30,213 UAPB and AAMU......

There needs to be some major input that goes to the SWAC main office and think on the 2007 Championship.....

In closing...The Biggest fact..The date needs to be changed !!!!!!!!!
It was TOO CLOSE to Christmas...


I suggest the 1st Saturday in December!!!!!

mr. swac bragged about how many people b'ham has? Well, my response to this is why in the heck can Legion field not draw more people, regardless of what the date is? A metropolitan area of that size (approximately 1.2 million), as mr. swac bragged, should be drawing many more fans.
It's time out for excuses, we need results.
bammans don't support their own teams, so how in the heck are they going to support somebody else? :shame: :shame:
We're dreaming if we think they are/will anytime soon.
Some folks need to get out of this denial state and develop some creative vision.:nod: :nod:
 
mr. swac bragged about how many people b'ham has? Well, my response to this is why in the heck can Legion field not draw more people, regardless of what the date is? A metropolitan area of that size (approximately 1.2 million), as mr. swac bragged, should be drawing many more fans.
It's time out for excuses, we need results.
bammans don't support their own teams, so how in the heck are they going to support somebody else? :shame: :shame:
We're dreaming if we think they are/will anytime soon.
Some folks need to get out of this denial state and develop some creative vision.:nod: :nod:

I think that the SCG should still be played, but why is the game three weeks after the season? The season either needs to start earlier or have the championship game after the last week of the season. This is the only conference I know that does this with their title game. I could see if the SWAC was an elite conference, but when not that many people show up to the game and TV ratings are horrible, it should be marketed differently.
I'm tired of hearing about if the SWAC changes something the fans won't like it. Honestly, the SWAC has to and should do what is best for the conference. I think that's why the conference suffers now. The SWAC caters to traditions and fans and boosters that want to have it their way. There needs to be a person in that office who is willing to take some chances and do some things differently to make the conference important again.
 



JayRob, I answered your questions with FACTS AND FIGURES, but you choose to ignore them. It's not my fault if you don't like it, but prove me wrong in what I'm saying.

blownup, some of us don't wake up as early on Sunday as you do, besides uapb fans were just happy to be in B'ham. If the SCG was on the moon, y'all probably would've still booked a flight. I'm sure y'all would rather drive 3-4 hours rather than 8 hours.

Now, back to the subject at hand.
Mr. SWAC, I'll put my scenario up against yours any day.
You're beatin a dead horse and you're flat out in denial. Ain't nobody gone drive 5,6, 7 or 8 hours to see a game, especially when their team's not in it.
Wake up and smell the coffee. Pine Bluff did it. I can see that. You need to wake up and acknowledge that.

I'm primarily referring to the SCG. If you want your headquarters in B'ham, so be it, but let the SCG be in a centralized location. It doesn't have to be Jackson. Just make it more convenient for the players, fans, bands, etc.
That's all I'm saying.
--You say the SCG is a business? Well for most businesses, isn't LOCATION, along with the contract most important? Location is a key component in business, and for this fact Birmingham, Al. swamps Jackson, Ms. in comparison. Sponsorship for the SCG is even better than that of the Soul Bowl. And this is supposed to be Jackson's biggest HBCU game. Promotors and sponsors are more willing to sign up in a bigger market. Birmingham is the bigger market. If the SWAC moved the SCG to Jackson look for sponsorships to fall off.

Location for not only the SCG, but for basketball and baseball as well.
Add gas costs for travel for all parties involved, that ALONE may offset what B'ham's offering in incentives. If AAMU/Bama St. make it, like we have been doing, we travel a further distance, so adding gas costs for travel for ALL parties involved, that is an incorrect statement.
--Why did the SEC leave B'ham? One of the reasons was due to the rundown conditions of Legion Field. It needs a major upgrade. Yes, but they moved mostly to play in a domed stadium, as well as a larger media market.
--800,000 dollars is still a lot more than 15,000 dollars no matter how you slice it.
--I only mentioned the B'ham police because one of the posters mentioned it. That's not a problem at all in Jackson. The one incident you mentioned out of the hundreds of times JSU's played at Memorial proves my point even more. You just mentioned ONE incident out of the THOUSAND times games have been played in Legion Field. Besides, THAT incident didn't even occur at Legion Field. It occured at UAPB's hotel. It had nothing to do with Legion Field.
--You say that coaches don't meet in B'ham anymore? Where do you get your information from? Now who's talking out of his azz?
Take note:
"The SWAC Media Luncheon will be held on Friday, July 28, 2006 at the Birmingham Downtown Sheraton Hotel. During the luncheon there will be presentations by all ten SWAC coaches, as well as the announcement of 2006 Preseason All-SWAC Football team and predicted order of finish." Dude you were talking about an emergency meeting and the sorts. You can't argue this as a point. How cheap are you???? The day the SWAC has to worry about the $ of traveling to media day is the day that Prairie View wins the Rose Bowl. (sorry PV) I think had just realized how crazy you sounded there, and tried to make up with this one. Even a more desparate reach attempt.
--Your comment about Memorial is used to mislead people. Memorial only counts tickets, they don't count student ID's or those who get in some other way. Even though many would like for them to have two attendance numbers, they don't have paid total and overall total attendance. No, I'm not talking about regular season games. I'm talking about games period played in Memorial. For the SCG students have to buy tickets, but they get them $15 with a student ID. Fact is, they can't enter without a ticket. Only tickets get you through the gate. The Saints Pre-season game was even an undercount this year, and you know that was all ticket sales. Can't blame this one on students.

Again Mr. SWAC, if y'all want to keep the headquarters in B'ham, go ahead, be my guest, I'm mainly concerned about the SCG.

If the SCG is to be great, B'ham's had their shot to make it great. As of now they've failed and they've not produced. It's time to give another city a shot at it, whether it's Jackson or another city that's convenient for most SWAC fans.
What's considered "failed". If you mean outdrawing the 1AA championship and some 1A Bowl games as failed, what's success? Again, the problem with the SCG is not Birmingham. It's you fickle ass fans. For whatever reason you choose to ignore facts and continue to DOWN-TALK the SCG. I remember we had a thread on here asking posters how many people they thought were going to show up to the SCG. Those replies should tell you what your problem is right there.
 
I have said this fact before several times........

At the 2006 MEAC-SWAC game which was played at Legion Field during Labor Day weekend...No games where going on and it only drew about 19,175 or so fans, etc....

I asked what was going on and a fan told me this statement.....


"If Alabama State or Alabama A&M ARE NOT playing here at Legion Field....
Then whatever game WILL NOT get support by the fans of Birmingham"...

Then all of the sudden...2006 Magic City Classic...AAMU and Alabama State and it produced over 66,233 fans !!!! WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Fast FoWard...2006 SWAC Championship in B'Ham...Drew only 30,213 UAPB and AAMU......

There needs to be some major input that goes to the SWAC main office and think on the 2007 Championship.....

In closing...The Biggest fact..The date needs to be changed !!!!!!!!!
It was TOO CLOSE to Christmas...


I suggest the 1st Saturday in December!!!!!

Did you just sit here and compare the 2nd MEAC/SWAC Challenge to the 65th Annual Magic City Classic (between in-state rivals), and the 8th SWAC Championship Game? Come on you got to see something wrong in your logic. Y'all kill me with this "ONLY 30,000" crap. lol Don't you know how many 1A Bowls wish they had "ONLY 30,000" attendance? But this is the SWAC, so the glass is always half-empty.

And Grambling vs. Alcorn took the 1st Saturday in December date this year. The next week was the High School Football Championships.
 
JayRob, I answered your questions with FACTS AND FIGURES, but you choose to ignore them. It's not my fault if you don't like it, but prove me wrong in what I'm saying.


What's considered "failed". If you mean outdrawing the 1AA championship and some 1A Bowl games as failed, what's success? Again, the problem with the SCG is not Birmingham. It's you fickle ass fans. For whatever reason you choose to ignore facts and continue to DOWN-TALK the SCG. I remember we had a thread on here asking posters how many people they thought were going to show up to the SCG. Those replies should tell you what your problem is right there.

Let's think about it, Okay the SWAC title game outdrew some bowl games and the 1-AA title game. However, it was just a conference title game. The teams in the bowl game and especially the national championship game had a little more to play for. I'm not talking down on the SCG, but in the grand scheme of things it's a glorified bad bowl game. Winning that game is equal to winning the Holiday Bowl, Papa Johns.com Bow or the Sun Bowl. You get a nice trophy, but you don't play for the national title. I know that winning the SWAC means something to the players and the fans, but for the SWAC it's bad because the conference has totally separated themselves from the rest of 1-AA football. That's why people feel SWAC football is a joke. It's run poorly.
 
Y da Swac isn't elgible for Bowl Game? Pt. II

Quote: (Mr. SWAC's posts in italics and bold print)

Mr. SWAC says, "JayRob, I answered your questions with FACTS AND FIGURES, but you choose to ignore them. It's not my fault if you don't like it, but prove me wrong in what I'm saying.

blownup, some of us don't wake up as early on Sunday as you do, besides uapb fans were just happy to be in B'ham. If the SCG was on the moon, y'all probably would've still booked a flight. I'm sure y'all would rather drive 3-4 hours rather than 8 hours.

Now, back to the subject at hand.
Mr. SWAC, I'll put my scenario up against yours any day.
You're beatin a dead horse and you're flat out in denial. Ain't nobody gone drive 5,6, 7 or 8 hours to see a game, especially when their team's not in it.
Wake up and smell the coffee. Pine Bluff did it. I can see that. You need to wake up and acknowledge that.

I'm primarily referring to the SCG. If you want your headquarters in B'ham, so be it, but let the SCG be in a centralized location. It doesn't have to be Jackson. Just make it more convenient for the players, fans, bands, etc.
That's all I'm saying.
--You say the SCG is a business? Well for most businesses, isn't LOCATION, along with the contract most important? Location is a key component in business, and for this fact Birmingham, Al. swamps Jackson, Ms. in comparison. Sponsorship for the SCG is even better than that of the Soul Bowl. And this is supposed to be Jackson's biggest HBCU game. Promotors and sponsors are more willing to sign up in a bigger market. Birmingham is the bigger market. If the SWAC moved the SCG to Jackson look for sponsorships to fall off.
Location for not only the SCG, but for basketball and baseball as well.
Add gas costs for travel for all parties involved, that ALONE may offset what B'ham's offering in incentives. If AAMU/Bama St. make it, like we have been doing, we travel a further distance, so adding gas costs for travel for ALL parties involved, that is an incorrect statement.
--Why did the SEC leave B'ham? One of the reasons was due to the rundown conditions of Legion Field. It needs a major upgrade. Yes, but they moved mostly to play in a domed stadium, as well as a larger media market.
--800,000 dollars is still a lot more than 15,000 dollars no matter how you slice it.
--I only mentioned the B'ham police because one of the posters mentioned it. That's not a problem at all in Jackson. The one incident you mentioned out of the hundreds of times JSU's played at Memorial proves my point even more. You just mentioned ONE incident out of the THOUSAND times games have been played in Legion Field. Besides, THAT incident didn't even occur at Legion Field. It occured at UAPB's hotel. It had nothing to do with Legion Field.
--You say that coaches don't meet in B'ham anymore? Where do you get your information from? Now who's talking out of his azz?
Take note:
"The SWAC Media Luncheon will be held on Friday, July 28, 2006 at the Birmingham Downtown Sheraton Hotel. During the luncheon there will be presentations by all ten SWAC coaches, as well as the announcement of 2006 Preseason All-SWAC Football team and predicted order of finish." Dude you were talking about an emergency meeting and the sorts. You can't argue this as a point. How cheap are you???? The day the SWAC has to worry about the $ of traveling to media day is the day that Prairie View wins the Rose Bowl. (sorry PV) I think had just realized how crazy you sounded there, and tried to make up with this one. Even a more desparate reach attempt.--Your comment about Memorial is used to mislead people. Memorial only counts tickets, they don't count student ID's or those who get in some other way. Even though many would like for them to have two attendance numbers, they don't have paid total and overall total attendance. No, I'm not talking about regular season games. I'm talking about games period played in Memorial. For the SCG students have to buy tickets, but they get them $15 with a student ID. Fact is, they can't enter without a ticket. Only tickets get you through the gate. The Saints Pre-season game was even an undercount this year, and you know that was all ticket sales. Can't blame this one on students.

Again Mr. SWAC, if y'all want to keep the headquarters in B'ham, go ahead, be my guest, I'm mainly concerned about the SCG.

If the SCG is to be great, B'ham's had their shot to make it great. As of now they've failed and they've not produced. It's time to give another city a shot at it, whether it's Jackson or another city that's convenient for most SWAC fans.

What's considered "failed". If you mean outdrawing the 1AA championship and some 1A Bowl games as failed, what's success? Again, the problem with the SCG is not Birmingham. It's you fickle ass fans. For whatever reason you choose to ignore facts and continue to DOWN-TALK the SCG. I remember we had a thread on here asking posters how many people they thought were going to show up to the SCG. Those replies should tell you what your problem is right there.

end of Mr.SWAC's most recent post



Mr. SWAC, you still just don't get it. Perhaps, you never will.
You still beatin that old dead carcass.:bawling:
--IF the SCG was held in Jackson, more than likely pb would've had a couple more thousand fans at the game.
--You said bama is a better location than Jackson? What?! Sounds like you been drinkin too much egg nog and vodka.:lol:
--You trying to tell a JSU Tiger which game is JSU's biggest HBCU game? It's obvious that you don't seem to know, so I won't tell you.
I can't spoon feed you everything.
Sponsors or no sponsors, the game's gonna get at least 35,000 simply because it's a rivalry game, so it really doesn't need any publicity to begin with.
--Mr. SWAC you said, if the game's moved to Jackson, look for sponsors to fall off? More disinfo. Where's your evidence?
If a sponsor's not willing to take a small risk in a city that's much closer to the majority of SWAC schools, they NEED to drop out simply because they have no creativity or vision, just like some of you bamma folks.
--If bama st. or a&m make it? It won't matter much to begin with because y'all don't bring many fans regardless of where y'all play, except to the mcc. How many times must this be reiterated?
Your fan base is not that big of a factor. Besides, y'all made it to the SCG during the turbulent b*ll years. I won't bother to go into that at this point and time.
The bottom line is, bamma schools are only two of five schools in the East.
There are fans at three more SWAC universities in the Eastern division sitting on the sidelines due to distance. Now that's what I call a waste of potential dollars.
--The condition of Legion Field played a factor in why the SEC moved. The stadium condition was clearly below their standards, yet you want the SWAC to play in something that's not good enough for the SEC? Get real.
--The pb incident regarding the b'ham police occurred in b'ham. Doesn't matter if it was at Legion Field or not. JPD officers don't usually harass football fans.
--Mr. SWAC stated that SWAC coaches DON'T meet IN PERSON anymore for meetings....they have conference calls. I mentioned nothing about an emergency meeting, and you know this.
You were proven wrong, so don't try and backtrack now.
Take the advice you gave me and admit that you were wrong and move on.
--Mr. SWAC, Memorial stadium had almost 60,000 in paid attendance in Jackson for the saints/colts, and this was ONLY for an exhibition game.
Obviously some fans got in who didn't purchase a ticket, so it's obvious that they wouldn't be counted in the total attendance.
--How in the heck can you call SWAC fans fickle, when y'all don't even support your own schools in bamma? Quit blaming bammas problems on the rest of the SWAC.
I do recall a&m bringing less than 600 fans to Jackson this year.
Remember the attendance stat posted earlier comparing JSU versus both bammas?
JSU outclassed BOTH bammas COMBINED in attendance, so quit blaming bammas lack of school support on other SWAC schools.:shame: :shame:
Sweep around your own front door before you try to sweep around someone else's.
Mr. SWAC, give up your argument and save yourself from further embarassment.

If you want the SWAC headquarters to remain in B'ham, so be it, however if the SCG is to grow in prestige, it ain't happening in B'ham.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top