SWAC Championship Game Rumor





I believe it was a 7- or 8-Game schedule prior to divisional play.

During the 2008 and 2009 seasons, the SWAC mandated an 7 game conference slate so more schools could schedule quality non-conference games. Some teams did play 8 or 9 games against opponents from the SWAC but only 7 of the games counted.
For example, during my senior year in 2008, We (Southern) hosted Mississippi Valley in Week 3 but the win did not count toward the SWAC Standings. That same year, Jackson State & Grambling played in week 4 and that game did not count towards the SWAC standings either.

In 2010, the SWAC went back to a 9 game conference slate.

It was a 7 game conference schedule. Some schools complained that they coudn't fill their non conference game out and the conference went to a full 9 game schedule.


Ok, thanks guys.:)

UAPB came back to the SWAC in 1997 (our probate year), so I'm a little fuzzy and might be thinking of those '93, '94, '95, and '96 games. Does anyone know if a 9-game mandate was in place in the earlier years of the 2000 decade? I'm asking because I know in 2004 we (UAPB) didn't play Southern or Alcorn. I know we played them '97-2001. We had a 9-game mandate (I believe) those years and I wondered why we didn't for 2004.

Back to the topic, I'm glad the SCG is back; it would've been nice if my folks played in Houston but hopefully we'll make it back to Birmingham again. I'm still wanting a re-match against AAMU.
 
Correction!

It's GRAMBLINGHAM

Surprised nobody said this earlier in the thread

@96lioness prior to the additions of UAPB and AAMU, the SWAC played a 7-game schedule since it had eight teams.

The SWAC went back and forth with the schedule so much since 2000 that it’s somewhat painful to recap.

I will still say the 9-game schedule severely hurt the competiveness of our member schools via isolation.
 
Surprised nobody said this earlier in the thread

@96lioness prior to the additions of UAPB and AAMU, the SWAC played a 7-game schedule since it had eight teams.

The SWAC went back and forth with the schedule so much since 2000 that it’s somewhat painful to recap.

I will still say the 9-game schedule severely hurt the competiveness of our member schools via isolation.


Yes, it's flip-flopped so much. (bolded statement) I like us (UAPB) playing our conference schools; however, I do like the idea of playing more non-conference schools. I'm not saying our conference schools don't, but a lot of times our OOC opponents push us and have a tendency to make us more competitive......at least it was during the mid-2000 year decade. So a 7-game mandate does make sense. It just feels weird (to me) not playing everyone in conference.
 
Do you honestly believe that grambling will show up in Birmingham one week, then come to Atlanta in 2 more weeks if they win?

Since your football program does not have a SWAC Championship winning tradition you don't understand the term "GRAMBLINGHAM."

Beans you know good and damn well (as the old folks say) why....Grambling has more SWAC Championships in Birmingham than any SWAC prorgram. Hence Gramblingham.....but thank you for admitting we will be in the Celebration Bowl.....LOL
 



I told y'all in the SWAC commissioner thread it was coming back to Birmingham and y'all laughed at me........... Y'all gonna learn to listen. I already knew this. Pillow talk told me about this and other moves but y'all think y'all know everything......

yeah I wasnt tryna hear that...lol BUT since its a one year deal, it makes sense. I didnt think the SWAC would enter a long term agrement without a commish.
 
In 13 years of the SCG being played in Birmingham, the game had an average attendance of 28,101. In 5 years of playing in Houston the game had an average attendance of 33,566, that is an increase of 5,465 people in average - but thats in a climate controlled, sparkling NFL stadium. Even with games of cold weather, raining weather, raining and cold weather, with an "aged" stadium, the game is averaging 28k. I am sure there are some Southern folks that can remember the 2 games with Bama State and especially the second game how terrible the weather was - that game only had 22k - which was a 10k person drop from that previous year's game. I guess what I am saying is that even in the comfortable confines of NRG the increase of 5k folks in attendance aint exactly what I would term kicking ass regarding who was turning out. Especially when compared to the previous conditions. And I go back to a point I have made earlier - anything we get over 21k is gravy.

But that is why we need a good Commish. NRG should never have less than around 40K.
 
When was the last time your fanbase saw a trophy....let that sink in...LMAO!!!!

You cant name a city after you and your fans dont show up. That's like Valley beating GSU every year at Robinson and calling it Valley Stadium. You cant claim a stadium without taking over. 5 fans wont cut it. Gramblingham never existed just lost Lostober and Sweptember never existed.
 
You cant name a city after you and your fans dont show up. That's like Valley beating GSU every year at Robinson and calling it Valley Stadium. You cant claim a stadium without taking over. 5 fans wont cut it. Gramblingham never existed just lost Lostober and Sweptember never existed.

Man go sit down!!!!

LOSStober was created specifically for jsu....Gramblingham was given that title because we won the most championships....you know this...stop acting like *rump!!!!

You know good and damn well Gramblingham, Losstober, and Sweptember exist....
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You cant name a city after you and your fans dont show up. That's like Valley beating GSU every year at Robinson and calling it Valley Stadium. You cant claim a stadium without taking over. 5 fans wont cut it. Gramblingham never existed just lost Lostober and Sweptember never existed.

Sheeeeeeit!

LOSStober and SWEPTember really happened. You ain’t gonna alternative facts is about that
 
Back
Top