Kobe made the assumption that they were only defending TM because he was AA. That was a mistake on Kobe's part. IMO, there were two parts to this. The first was that TM was being attacked by the right-wing media complex. They dug up school discipline records, pictures on the web, anything they could find to paint the kid as a thug who deserved what he got...and also that wearing a hoody was what drew GZ to approach him. TM being AA fed into the stereotype. So, those who were more socially conscience stood up for the kid and said that wearing a hoody does not make you a criminal. It's rare that you find superstar athletes taking a stand on a social issue so I have to applaud them for this. You folks may recall that the NCAA has taken a social stand I believe (by not playing Bowl games in a certain state), the NFL took a stand against AZ by not allowing the Super Bowl to be played there until they passed the King Holiday. I wonder if Kobe wouldn't support that, being that MLK was AA?
The second part was the SYG law which allowed GZ not even to be charged until AA activists got involved. So, if you put the two together, if you're a certain type of kid wearing a hoodie who has had trouble in the past, you can be shot and killed for the way you're dressed and the SYG law will cover the shooter. I think records for the application of the law shows that it doesn't work the same for each social group though.