Black athletes should boycott the SEC?


This is a non starter unless people can figure out a way to offer them the money those schools do. Plus, why just limit it to the SEC? Georgia is about to do the exact same thing. All red states are going to end up doing it at some point. All of this stuff is political. Kinda like how I went to vote early last week and the realized that the ballots no longer classify people by their party. It was like Governor, and then just 10 names where they didn't specify which party they were running in.

I already knew who to vote for, but this is going to cause a LOT of people to just click names and vote for whoever since they can't see if it's a Democrat or a Republican. That would mean no more GT, no more Clemson, no more Georgia State, no more Kennesaw State, no more Jacksonville State, no more Troy, no more South Alabama, no more Southern Miss, no more USM....so on and so forth. Do we at all believe that's sensible? Where would all of those kids go? Unless there's gonna be 30 more large HBCU's built in the south, where are all of those kids supposed to go? Eventually it'll affect Midwestern states like Ohio and Indiana...right along with Oklahoma, Kansas, Kentucky, West Virginia...

Texas already tried the same even before the Supreme Court ruling so that would rule them out too...along with Texas A&M, Baylor,, Texas Tech, SMU, Texas State, North Texas, TCU, Houston, UTSA, UTEP, Rice, Sam Houston State, UGTRV, Abilene Christian, Tarleton State, Lamar, S F Austin, Incarnate Word, East Texas A&M and Houston Christian. Black athletes in Texas wouldn't be able to attend any of those schools if that's what people are pushing for. They're all white schools, not just the SEC. And the FBS ones are all paying, just not the same amounts. So where does the line get drawn?
 



unknown1 said:
This is a non starter unless people can figure out a way to offer them the money those schools do. Plus, why just limit it to the SEC? Georgia is about to do the exact same thing. All red states are going to end up doing it at some point. All of this stuff is political. Kinda like how I went to vote early last week and the realized that the ballots no longer classify people by their party. It was like Governor, and then just 10 names where they didn't specify which party they were running in.

I already knew who to vote for, but this is going to cause a LOT of people to just click names and vote for whoever since they can't see if it's a Democrat or a Republican. That would mean no more GT, no more Clemson, no more Georgia State, no more Kennesaw State, no more Jacksonville State, no more Troy, no more South Alabama, no more Southern Miss, no more USM....so on and so forth. Do we at all believe that's sensible? Where would all of those kids go? Unless there's gonna be 30 more large HBCU's built in the south, where are all of those kids supposed to go? Eventually it'll affect Midwestern states like Ohio and Indiana...right along with Oklahoma, Kansas, Kentucky, West Virginia...

Texas already tried the same even before the Supreme Court ruling so that would rule them out too...along with Texas A&M, Baylor,, Texas Tech, SMU, Texas State, North Texas, TCU, Houston, UTSA, UTEP, Rice, Sam Houston State, UGTRV, Abilene Christian, Tarleton State, Lamar, S F Austin, Incarnate Word, East Texas A&M and Houston Christian. Black athletes in Texas wouldn't be able to attend any of those schools if that's what people are pushing for. They're all white schools, not just the SEC. And the FBS ones are all paying, just not the same amounts. So where does the line get drawn?
Click to expand...

alot of those schools don't really have large black populations combined so if you spread them out across HBCUs it wouldn't cause a log jam - maybe for some that are more popular

but in reality we won't boycott nor some even know anything about this voting stuff so it'll be business as usual
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top