TxSU President to Lead NCAA Advisory Board on Limited Resource Institutions


Status
Not open for further replies.
tsuball10 said:
I understand y'all's point but what you can't understand is that no matter what the vote was it wasn't going to effect LRI's the discussion didnt start gaining momentum til after the NCAA raised the bar which was clearly after the vote to ban southern and jsu this is something that can benefit any school and some reason y'all still find a reason to cry this is not about tsu or southern and jsu if you don't like who is representing our schools send a letter to your presidents and tell them to step up. Sheshh
Click to expand...



So because we pointed out the hypocrisy that you admit you understand...we're crying?! :retard:

Our President did step up...in 2011, but the messenger we are supposed to be applauding shot her down. Only to turn around and steal her message and put it in his own words?! Shut up! :lmao:
 
So if this actually benefits your school you still gonna be mad?


southsuburbs said:
So because we pointed out the hypocrisy that you admit you understand...we're crying?! :retard:

Our President did step up...in 2011, but the messenger we are supposed to be applauding shot her down. Only to turn around and steal her message and put it in his own words?! Shut up! :lmao:
Click to expand...
 



tsuball10 said:
So if this actually benefits your school you still gonna be mad?
Click to expand...

"...still gonna be mad?" :confused:
Who's mad?! :noidea: First we're crying...now we're mad. Dang!! :emlaugh:

"If it actually benefits our school...",
It WILL benefit our school...which is why our President was pointing it out in 2011. But folks couldn't understand her then because they were blinded by the Hate for The Jackson State University!! Now them muddafuggers done used Obamacare and got their eyes checked and want to act like they had a Revelation. :popcorn:
 
Last edited:
Do you understand that if the swac updated the rules that there would have been a vote And the schools would have been banned anyways


southsuburbs said:
"...still gonna be mad?" :confused:
Who's mad?! :noidea: First we're crying...now we're mad. Dang!! :emlaugh:

"If it actually benefits our school...",
It WILL benefit our school...which is why our President was pointing it out in 2011. But folks couldn't understand her then because they were blinded by the Hate for The Jackson State University!! Now them muddafuggers done used Obamacare and got their eyes checked and want to act like they had a Revelation or some shyt. :popcorn:
Click to expand...
 
tsuball10 said:
Do you understand that if the swac updated the rules that there would have been a vote And the schools would have been banned anyways
Click to expand...

:smh:

Damn...I thought you were seeing the light. The tunnel is closing on you too.

Step Into the light Carol-Ann!! Step into the LIght!!
 
I guess this thread proves a point. You can lead a bunch of dummies to the book, but you can't make the dummies read and understand it. I guess it is called dummified.
 
jag4life said:
He could not have done anything about "disadvantages" with that vote. Yall are ridiculous.
Click to expand...

Wrong again. He could've made a loud and emphatic statement of his disdain for the way the APR system is set up but instead, he's doing exactly what the SWAC did when they retroactively penalized teams with a policy that wasn't even in place when the supposed infractions were committed. They made up rules after the fact. Rudley is doing the exact same thing. Those SWAC APR rules were never in place to begin with.
I know you understand whats being said, you just don't want to say it publicly.
 
jag4life said:
The problem with your argument is that SU, JSU (and GSU basketball) were already BANNED by the NCAA based on the unfair criteria. Nothing done with THAT VOTE was going to change that nor was it going to change the criteria used.

The SWAC vote only gave clarity about whether the SCG was a part of the NCAA ban on postseason games.
Click to expand...

JSU and SU weren't banned from football.
 



tsuball10 said:
I understand y'all's point but what you can't understand is that no matter what the vote was it wasn't going to effect LRI's the discussion didnt start gaining momentum til after the NCAA raised the bar which was clearly after the vote to ban southern and jsu this is something that can benefit any school and some reason y'all still find a reason to cry this is not about tsu or southern and jsu if you don't like who is representing our schools send a letter to your presidents and tell them to step up. Sheshh
Click to expand...

Not an accurate post. Several HBCU's were complaining long before the NCAA decided to raise the standards.
And it's highly disengenuous for folks to use the word "crying" when people have the right to voice their opinions.
I guess White folks told Black folks the same thing during the Civil Rights era in the '60's and '70's.....which was quit crying. I'm glad and thankful that those voicing their displeasure didn't listen.
 
CEE DOG said:
I guess this thread proves a point. You can lead a bunch of dummies to the book, but you can't make the dummies read and understand it. I guess it is called dummified.
Click to expand...

Hey Cee, don't be so hard on yourself and your cohorts. Deep down you know what we're saying but your hate (which you readily admit any chance you get) once again is getting in the way.
 
Sorry player. We don't have dummies on our team. We were already above 930 before the NCAA made yall do it. Notice they made JSU do it. If not for the rule you would still be 800. :shame:
JayRob said:
Hey Cee, don't be so hard on yourself and your cohorts. Deep down you know what we're saying but your hate (which you readily admit any chance you get) once again is getting in the way.
Click to expand...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top