TxSU President to Lead NCAA Advisory Board on Limited Resource Institutions


Status
Not open for further replies.
T

TSUGIRL07

Well-Known Member
Rudley has been leading the charge to get the attention of NCAA to let them know that “one size doesn’t fit all,” as it relates to resources, infractions, sanctions, etc. Rudley is pleased to have the opportunity to lead and work with this group.

“The goal of increasing the graduation and completion rates for student athletes is strongly supported by every college president. The issue is how quickly can institutions with limited resources, such as the HBCUs, add the infrastructure critical to making the improvements in Academic Performance Rate (APR),” said Rudley.

To date, the advisory group has provided recommendations to the CAP based on concerns that limited-resource institutions are at a disadvantage due to the amount of resources available to make academic changes to increase the APR. The transition recommendation allows limited-resource institutions—teams in the bottom 15 percent of all Division I member institutions in resources—more time to make meaningful change for academically underperforming teams. The LRI would have until 2016 to implement the APR minimum score of 930. This is an additional two years longer than the original NCAA proposal. The other recommendations support the ongoing APR improvement of limited-resource institutions and facilitate working towards meeting the established benchmark of a score of 930 for all teams.

http://diverseeducation.com/article/51633/#
 
Last edited:
Leveling the playing field is of the utmost importance. Pretending all is well with not get it done.


TSUGIRL07 said:
Rudley has been leading the charge to get the attention of NCAA to let them know that “one size doesn’t fit all,” as it relates to resources, infractions, sanctions, etc. Rudley is pleased to have the opportunity to lead and work with this group.

“The goal of increasing the graduation and completion rates for student athletes is strongly supported by every college president. The issue is how quickly can institutions with limited resources, such as the HBCUs, add the infrastructure critical to making the improvements in Academic Performance Rate (APR),” said Rudley.

To date, the advisory group has provided recommendations to the CAP based on concerns that limited-resource institutions are at a disadvantage due to the amount of resources available to make academic changes to increase the APR. The transition recommendation allows limited-resource institutions—teams in the bottom 15 percent of all Division I member institutions in resources—more time to make meaningful change for academically underperforming teams. The LRI would have until 2016 to implement the APR minimum score of 930. This is an additional two years longer than the original NCAA proposal. The other recommendations support the ongoing APR improvement of limited-resource institutions and facilitate working towards meeting the established benchmark of a score of 930 for all teams.

http://diverseeducation.com/article/51633/#
Click to expand...
 



real simple...pay the right people to keep you in line...

plus, you got to have the "right" majors to steer athletes to who are borderline academically
 
A big :tup: to my main man that did all the research behind providing Dr. Rudley with his facts and figures.

:clap:
 
Last edited:
I am surprised how few comments are on this thread, considering this is an issue that effects many of the schools supported on this forum. One would think the institutions that could potentially benefit from the suggestions of this advisory board would show support. Although, I guess I should have expected those organizations to sit back and ......................
 
Da Sleeper said:
I am surprised how few comments are on this thread, considering this is an issue that effects many of the schools supported on this forum. One would think the institutions that could potentially benefit from the suggestions of this advisory board would show support. Although, I guess I should have expected for them to sit back and ......................
Click to expand...
ASK......What you over ther bothering dem nice white folk fo?
 
I feel ya' Sleepa



Da Sleeper said:
I am surprised how few comments are on this thread, considering this is an issue that effects many of the schools supported on this forum. One would think the institutions that could potentially benefit from the suggestions of this advisory board would show support. Although, I guess I should have expected those organizations to sit back and ......................
Click to expand...
 
Every SWAC institutions fall Limited-Resource Institution category (all but two MEAC programs fall under the LRI category).
 
what's to say? The key is developing your loopholes

The bottom line are we paying coaches to win or graduate or both? If they post high APR but suck on the field, is that grounds for removal? An academically sound and high athletic achieving African American athlete is already coveted...so imagine that's the norm needed to compete makes it worse
 
You sound semi-racist tbf. It's more appropriate to say "a high-achieving student-athlete is coveted." Who cares about some funky skin color other than a racist? If this is indicative of PV's recruiting profile, just a black athlete, it's e-z to determine why it loses at a clip of well over 99.7% OOC vs pwcus in ALL sports.

Also, the only issue I'd have w/ LRIs using what may be extra funding is the ones in charge of the funds who may place others in charge who were/are incapable of understanding required primitive latin. :smh:
 
Last edited:
Was this the SAME President who voted to ban JSU and SU from the SWAC championship football game due to NCAA APR sanctions? As a matter of fact many folks from said schools brought up these same concerns before the NCAA did.
Some folks simply told us to shut up and take our medicine. Now some of those same folks are nowhere to be found.
 
JayRob said:
Was this the SAME President who voted to ban JSU and SU from the SWAC championship football game due to NCAA APR sanctions? As a matter of fact many folks from said schools brought up these same concerns before the NCAA did.
Some folks simply told us to shut up and take our medicine. Now some of those same folks are nowhere to be found.
Click to expand...

No he wasn't (if you believe otherwise, can you share a link where he voted in favor of JSU and SU to banned?).
 
JayRob said:
Was this the SAME President who voted to ban JSU and SU from the SWAC championship football game due to NCAA APR sanctions? As a matter of fact many folks from said schools brought up these same concerns before the NCAA did.
Some folks simply told us to shut up and take our medicine. Now some of those same folks are nowhere to be found.
Click to expand...

I was thinking the same thing when I first saw this thread. LIke, "wait...didn't that mofo vote against us"?! :lol:

:popcorn:
 



C-LeB28 said:
No he wasn't (if you believe otherwise, can you share a link where he voted in favor of JSU and SU to banned?).
Click to expand...

All you need to ask is who was the President during the voting to ban JSU and SU? If he was, then he did vote against us eventhough his school's APR was much lower than both JSU and SU's APR numbers.
 
JayRob said:
Was this the SAME President who voted to ban JSU and SU from the SWAC championship football game due to NCAA APR sanctions? As a matter of fact many folks from said schools brought up these same concerns before the NCAA did.
Some folks simply told us to shut up and take our medicine. Now some of those same folks are nowhere to be found.
Click to expand...

I actually was wondering this too.
 
JayRob said:
All you need to ask is who was the President during the voting to ban JSU and SU? If he was, then he did vote against us eventhough his school's APR was much lower than both JSU and SU's APR numbers.
Click to expand...

Rudley was well aware what our current APR figures were and what the future projections were calculating to be knowing our "hit" was inevitable so why would he go with it?
 
C-LeB28 said:
Rudley was well aware what our current APR figures were and what the future projections were calculating to be knowing our "hit" was inevitable so why would he go with it?
Click to expand...

Did he vote for it...yes or no? Seems to me that the votes were 7-2-1 with all schools voting yes, except JSU and SU. Alcorn's President abstained.
So please tell me where is it shown that your President didn't vote for JSU and SU's ban, yet he's suddenly complaining about the APR now that HIS school's head is on the so-called chopping block.
Sounds very hypocritical to me because if he at that time REALLY was so concerned about APR disadvantages, he wouldn't have voted to ban two schools who were suffering due to those disadvantages.
 
DallasCowboyGirl said:
C why are you trying to explaining to the simple!
Click to expand...

Call us simple if that helps, nevertheless if your President voted for the ban, he's being highly disingenuous and clearly hypocritical. No ifs, ands or buts about it.
If he didn't vote "yes" for the ban, please show it. I'll gladly retract all previous comments if you can do that. Thanks in advance.
 
There was a 10 page thread on this when it happened back in 2011. I'm pretty sure TxSou voted to ban us. Whether or not you had the same Prez then is another question.
 
:popcorn:

Still though, the ncaa will waste funds directed to LRIs because some of those same LRI officials charged w/ metting those funds to support staff responsible for implementing a POA did not (past tense) and more than naught still cannot understand the latin language. :smh: Novel idea. But I'm pessimistic due to coming in the know of the mentally incapable ones charged to oversee PV's athl programs.
 
I was against JSU being banned when they were. And it's total BS that with a straight face this joker is essentially asking for leniency when he did not have the humanity to show leniency to other schools in his own conference. This is a damn joke...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top