Ok, first off, you mean to tell me that all those grid lines on the globes and maps arent real?? Wow no wonder when NASA sent the shuttle or a rocket up we never saw them!!!!!
Next why are you posting information to me? You the one trying to defend a point by talking about imaginary lat/long lines.
Also what you posted made no sense, "If the earth is shaped like a sphere (more egg-shaped like), no line drawn on its surface is a true straight line, which is why one can only see so far out on the horizon on a straight line due to the earth's curvature" A straight line is a straight line is a straight line, if I shoot a laser from one point to another even on a curved surface, it would still be a straight line, but again since there are no grid lines on the earth that point is moot.
Also please stop with this the earth is shaped more like an egg, We have satellite pictures that refute this Neil Degrasse Tyson explanation of how the earth is shaped.. Its language like this that give flat earthers fuel.
And one more point, I'm not sure where you got that photo from, but only a person who believes in flat earth would call the earth "imaginary ball earth".
I can see now you weren't a STEM major. You better stick to basket weaving, because you are beginning to sound like B.o.B. In science, there is no such thing as a
TRUE line, since the thickness of a
TRUE line can't be measured, basically dimensionless. Therefore, if a line is drawn to represent a
TRUE line, it is an imaginary line, such as the latitude and longitude lines that parallel the earth's curvature. Same thing goes for a point somewhere out in space. Here's a question: Assuming there's no refraction and you shoot a laser beam straight out into the open horizon from where you are standing on the earth, would it beam to the opposite side of the earth or would it beam somewhere out in space??? Here's another question: If engineers were able to build a road from the United States to China, would the road
CURVE around the earth from the United States to China???
Also, the imaginary ball earth term is just a term used to represent the shape of the earth, as in the earth is shaped like a ball.
You do realize the way you used the terms 'flat' and 'ball' together is an oxymoron. Once the term ball is introduced, then you can't make the claim that it is flat. Same goes for B.o.B. wanting to put a satellite in orbit around what he claims is a flat earth. The definition of orbit is the
curved path of a celestial object or spacecraft around a star, planet, or moon, especially a periodic elliptical revolution. If the Earth was flat, the satellite would go in a straight line path with four 90-degree turns, which equals 360-degrees around a flat surface. LOL!!! I can only assume you and B.o.B. have never heard of three dimensional calculus or Newton-Raphson Method for curve fitting.