I'm not following your logic. You're basically saying get a young black coach that can recruit for the sake of getting a young black coach that can recruit, but why exactly? What makes this mysterious young black coach you're talking about more accomplished than anyone else young or old, black or white.....recruiting is important, but you insinuate he'll be good at it just because he's young and black. What proof is there he'll be good at it just because he falls into that demographic?
Thank you Law Dawg.
High School Guy - who is this young "protege" that you are supporting who is currently on the TSU coaching staff? The only person I think you could be talking about is Jackson and he will tell you himself he is not ready for a head coaching gig. I am cool with the guy. He is definitely on the way up and attends many NFL coaching clinics for his own personal development, but he still wants to grow. He is a rising star though - if that is who you are talking about. I am not against your approach of giving young coaches, or employees in general, a chance if they are the best person for the job. But I agree with Law Dawg, just because he is black and young does not justify us hiring based simply on those criteria.
And I still say "some", not all black kids, and their parents feel validated from playing for a white coach. I am not saying I agree that it is right, but it happens. Sorry, I won't change my statement about that. I have seen it a thousand times coming from small town America.
And the coach you mentioned above - who shall remain nameless - was/is a winner. Him and his brother win everywhere they go. No one can really dispute that. The problem is that when they leave, they usually have done something against the rules.