Swac golf champs 2010


TexasTerror said:
Nothing negative in this thread, just information sharing.

You are talking about a composite of work. I'm talking about this one thread.

Question - any reason why you do not post information about your school's postseason play and have to rely on someone that is not even in the SWAC to post about it? Does it not matter that JSU is representing the SWAC in women's golf? Is NCAA play even important to you as a fan?
Click to expand...

Dude, you could care less about SWAC postseason play unless it's something negative. Folks on this site list SWAC scores, regular and/or playoff season scores of all sorts no matter if it's positive or negative.

For some odd reason, you seem to get a twinkle in your eye when you post your negative drivel about the SWAC. Again, you have that right, so enjoy yourself.
 
JayRob said:
Dude, you could care less about SWAC postseason play unless it's something negative. Folks on this site list SWAC scores, regular and/or playoff season scores of all sorts no matter if it's positive or negative.

For some odd reason, you seem to get a twinkle in your eye when you post your negative drivel about the SWAC. Again, you have that right, so enjoy yourself.
Click to expand...

Where's the negative drivel in this post?

There is none. I posted the destination of your golf team (and no one responded to that) after no one else did. I posted the results of your golf team and the only response to that are offensive remarks directed at me. It really gets old...
 
Last edited:



TexasTerror said:
Where's the negative drivel in this post?

There is none. I posted the destination of your golf team (and no one responded to that) after no one else did. I posted the results of your golf team and the only response to that are offensive remarks directed at me. It really gets old...
Click to expand...

First of all, I wasn't specifically referring to your golf posting. I was referring to most of your previous posts pertaining to the SWAC.
Was I wrong in saying that 99.9 percent of your posts are negative towards the SWAC? I can pull up your anti-SWAC comments if you want me too.

Prove me wrong by posting positive happenings within the SWAC, minus the backhand comments you usually include. An old dog can change you know. It's not too late, not even for you. So let's not play the victim, when you know you're not.
 
Last edited:
JayRob said:
First of all, I wasn't specifically referring to your golf posting. I was referring to most of your previous posts pertaining to the SWAC.
Was I wrong in saying that 99.9 percent of your posts are negative towards the SWAC? I can pull up your anti-SWAC comments if you want me too.

Prove me wrong by posting positive happenings within the SWAC, minus the backhand comments you usually include. An old dog can change you know. It's not too late, not even for you. So let's not play the victim, when you know you're not.
Click to expand...

Here I am being positive about your golf team, sharing info on their postseason qualification and appearance...and you are ruining the discussion by breaking in with negativity.

That alleged 99.9 percent number sure must be going down, since I'm having to devote a few too many posts for trying to turn the discussion back to a JSU golf team that is representing YOUR alma mater and YOUR conference in the postseason...probably hurt the number some discussing Texas HS girls' track and field with a board that I felt was pretty knowledgeable about the subject too. What's wrong with the world?
 
TexasTerror said:
Here I am being positive about your golf team, sharing info on their postseason qualification and appearance...and you are ruining the discussion by breaking in with negativity.

That alleged 99.9 percent number sure must be going down, since I'm having to devote a few too many posts for trying to turn the discussion back to a JSU golf team that is representing YOUR alma mater and YOUR conference in the postseason...probably hurt the number some discussing Texas HS girls' track and field with a board that I felt was pretty knowledgeable about the subject too. What's wrong with the world?
Click to expand...

So, now I have the power to force you to quit talking about golf teams now? Didn't know I had that much power over you or your fingertips. Based on your responses, there seems to be some validity in your mind to what I've said.
You are who you are. There is hope though that you'll change, but do it for yourself, not for anyone else.

Any how, carry on with your golfing discussion.
 
What was the weather like at this course? It was in Indiana right? What was the setup? Did they play from the mens tees??

Nita,

I'm trying...but the dumb joker don't wanna walkon..but at least he's going to school there! Yayyyyy!!!
 
FYI (apologies to JayRob on posting this...), No. 258 ranked (by Golf Week) JSU is going to A&M...AND Grambling's Jason Coleman, the 1,471 ranked golfer in Div I, will be joining.


Site: Traditions Club, College Station, Texas
Host: Texas A&M

* 1. Texas A&M (2)
* 2. Texas Tech (13)
* 3. Georgia (Southeastern Conference) (12)
* 4. North Florida (22)
* 5. TCU (21)
* 6. Pepperdine (West Coast Conference) (33)
* 7. Auburn (35)
* 8. North Carolina (55)
* 9. Baylor (52)
* 10. Tulsa (67)
* 11. Rice (59)
* 12. Wichita State (Missouri Valley Conference) (69)
* 13. Georgetown (Big East Conference) (204)
* 14. Jackson State (Southwestern Athletic Conference) (258)

Individuals:

* 1. Oscar Zetterwall, New Orleans (127)
* 2. Ken Looper, New Orleans (113)
* 3. Philipp Fendt, Louisiana-Lafayette (97)
* 4. Scott Kelly, Sam Houston State (176)
* 5. Jason Coleman, Grambling (1,471)

http://www.golfweek.com/news/2010/may/10/ncaa-mens-regional-bids-revealed/
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top