Supreme Court rulings on same-sex marriage hailed as historic victory


Unknowm

Well-Known Member
(CNN) -- Gays and lesbians celebrated historic gains Wednesday in their fight against laws limiting same-sex marriages, saying Supreme Court rulings overturning the federal Defense of Marriage Act and rejecting the appeal of a California marriage ban represent a "joyous milestone."

But they acknowledged much work remains after the Supreme Court declined to make a sweeping statement on same-sex marriage rights by not ruling on the issues in California's Proposition 8 ban on same-sex marriages.

"While we celebrate the victory for Californians today, tomorrow we turn our attention to the millions of LGBT people who don't feel the reach of these decisions," he said.

The court rulings, delivered in separate cases, mean that same-sex couples who marry in states where it's legal for them to do so will be treated the same as heterosexual married couples by the federal government when it comes to things like retirement benefits and taxes.

And while the ruling clears the way for same-sex marriages to resume in California, it will have no impact on bans in 35 other states where such marriages are illegal.


http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/26/politics/scotus-same-sex-main/index.html?hpt=hp_t1
 



When you prove God does not exist then we will have our answer. Do you have proof? Please provide it. I would be willing to honestly and openly look at your proof. Thanks!!!

Prove the existence of God. Physical Evidence please.
 
Prove the existence of God. Physical Evidence please.

:lol: :emlaugh:
not_this_shit_again.jpg
 
Hopefully, all of the preachers of the gospel are going to continue to preach the truth of what God has said in His Word.

That's as it should be. We have a secular government and thank God we do Not live in a theocracy.
 
When you prove God does not exist then we will have our answer. Do you have proof? Please provide it. I would be willing to honestly and openly look at your proof. Thanks!!!


We can't prove a negative. however, you are positive that your "God" exists. If he does, then you have evidence.

Please provide this evidence.
 
You are the one who has proof he does not exist. You can not prove that what is in the bible is not true. Prove it is a lie and I will believe you.
We can't prove a negative. however, you are positive that your "God" exists. If he does, then you have evidence.

Please provide this evidence.
 



When you prove God does not exist then we will have our answer. Do you have proof? Please provide it. I would be willing to honestly and openly look at your proof. Thanks!!!


Were you home-schooled? You don't ask someone to prove a negative.

A negative proof is a logical fallacy which takes the structure of:

X is true because there is no proof that X is false. If the only evidence for something's existence is a lack of evidence for it not existing, then the default position is one of skepticism and not credulity. This type of negative proof is common in proofs of God's existence or in pseudosciences where it is used to attempt to shift the burden of proof onto the skeptic rather than the proponent of the idea. The burden of proof is on the individual proposing existence, not the one questioning existence.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Negative_proof
 
Nikker you got a education in the state of Sippi. You should be the last one to question someones education. Your atheist intellect shows that you have no common sense. You can not prove that God does not exist. You can only post what some white dude that is an atheist like you wrote. Dummies of a feather flock together. A sippi education at its best. I guess you grew up in one of those towns that shut down for picking cotton during the school year didn't you? By the way you dumb Sippi recipient of an education, Sippi has never finished above being ranked 45-50 in education. It shows for you atheist too. Now go pick some cotton slave.
Were you home-schooled? You don't ask someone to prove a negative.

A negative proof is a logical fallacy which takes the structure of:

X is true because there is no proof that X is false. If the only evidence for something's existence is a lack of evidence for it not existing, then the default position is one of skepticism and not credulity. This type of negative proof is common in proofs of God's existence or in pseudosciences where it is used to attempt to shift the burden of proof onto the skeptic rather than the proponent of the idea. The burden of proof is on the individual proposing existence, not the one questioning existence.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Negative_proof
 
Last edited:
Were you home-schooled? You don't ask someone to prove a negative.

A negative proof is a logical fallacy which takes the structure of:

X is true because there is no proof that X is false. If the only evidence for something's existence is a lack of evidence for it not existing, then the default position is one of skepticism and not credulity. This type of negative proof is common in proofs of God's existence or in pseudosciences where it is used to attempt to shift the burden of proof onto the skeptic rather than the proponent of the idea. The burden of proof is on the individual proposing existence, not the one questioning existence.

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Negative_proof

1. You used wikipedia as a source, no person with any credibility would do that

2. You can prove something is false, see: the world being flat, the world revolving around the sun, and others.

That is science my friend. You take a position and research it to prove it's accuracy or lack there of.
 
Well when these atheists with their small time, small town complexes that are mad at big momma because she made them go to church on Sunday and go to school looking like country church kids move on, so will we. Look they can't be mad at the world because someone let them down or what they wished for didn't happen. Get over it and move on. Geessh.

Must we be subject to this again.. Take that to the prayer board.
 
I do not understand why some people are bent on preventing the happiness of others based on their personal beliefs. I want all people to be happy, just as long it does not harm society, and being gay does not harm society. Now, if there was a person harming children or animals in any way, then that is different. As far as two consenting adults, I could care less, and apparently time could care less as well.

I wonder what are some people protesting this say about prison conditions or victims of molestation. People are far too single minded.
 
Well when these atheists with their small time, small town complexes that are mad at big momma because she made them go to church on Sunday and go to school looking like country church kids move on, so will we. Look they can't be mad at the world because someone let them down or what they wished for didn't happen. Get over it and move on. Geessh.

You really believe this do you? :lol:
 
Back
Top