Southern University remains under postseason ban because of APR problems





Number1,

Originally Posted by number1
So the question is, what happens if they can't make the things match up? Does the NCAA just keep extending the ban?
Click to expand...

Once Southern completes the re-certification of athletes during that time frame in question by the NCAA, then the NCAA can evaluate what would be an appropriate punishment, if there were any violations of NCAA rules. The NCAA would provide the punishment commensurate with similar cases in the past (i.e. The cases of HBCU athletic programs such as Texas Southern, Alabama State and Florida A&M).
 
Jafus (Thinker) said:
Number1,



Once Southern completes the re-certification of athletes during that time frame in question by the NCAA, then the NCAA can evaluate what would be an appropriate punishment, if there were any violations of NCAA rules. The NCAA would provide the punishment commensurate with similar cases in the past (i.e. The cases of HBCU athletic programs such as Texas Southern, Alabama State and Florida A&M).
Click to expand...
So are you saying they want SU to generate records that were never kept?
 
TexasTerror said:
Because William Broussard said as much on social media, Said a low revenue institution can't afford to hire the firm and keep them on retainer. If they did, wouldn't be in situation presently in.

Are you indicating the AD is wrong?
Click to expand...

One shouldn't believe everything he hears via the media.
 
Jag4Life,

So are you saying they want SU to generate records that were never kept?
Click to expand...

No, they want Southern to re-certify the student athletes that participated in athletics during the time frame that is under review. If that means finding a way to obtain records (transcripts, & etc.) from previous institutions so re certification of all of those athletes can be reviewed, then that is what has to be done.
 
Jafus (Thinker) said:
Jag4Life,



No, they want Southern to re-certify the student athletes that participated in athletics during the time frame that is under review. If that means finding a way to obtain records (transcripts, & etc.) from previous institutions so re certification of all of those athletes can be reviewed, then that is what has to be done.
Click to expand...

Well I can certainly understand why it has been hard for them to do since the records obviously weren't readily available.
 
Number1,

Well I can certainly understand why it has been hard for them to do since the records obviously weren't readily available.
Click to expand...

I agree. But, unfortunately for SWAC schools previously and currently under this review and now Southern, it is obvious that the NCAA does not care that this is the case. The NCAA is standing firm that it must be done before the NCAA will move forward with lifting the ban, reviewing the audit for congruence on current policies and if necessary issuing penalties associated with any rules violation against those current policies. Again, I believe the NCAA is making a statement regarding the "importance" of certifying of players and certification audit process. Along with the APR, the certifying of players and certification audit process is creating a slow death for our institution's athletic departments. I would suggest the SWAC Office hire Mike Moletta or someone from the NCAA that has his level of expertise and experience to support each institution with APR, the certifying of players (above what is the current responsibility of the SWAC Office personnel) and certification audit process. This is beyond a branding nightmare, it is beginning to influence the financial stability of revenue associated the conference tournaments.
 
Last edited:
Jafus (Thinker) said:
Number1,



I agree. But, unfortunately for SWAC schools previously and currently under this review and now Southern, it is obvious that the NCAA does not care that this is the case. The NCAA is standing firm that it must be done before the NCAA will move forward with lifting the ban, reviewing the audit for congruence on current policies and if necessary issuing penalties associated with any rules violation against those current policies. Again, I believe the NCAA is making a statement regarding the "importance" of certifying of players and certification audit process. Along with the APR, the certifying of players and certification audit process is creating a slow death for our institution's athletic departments. I would suggest the SWAC Office hire Mike Moletta or someone from the NCAA that has his level of expertise and experience to support each institution with APR, the certifying of players (above what is the current responsibility of the SWAC Office personnel) and certification audit process. This is beyond a branding nightmare, it is beginning to influence the financial stability of revenue associated the conference tournaments.
Click to expand...

Nah.....they're picking a fight they believe they can win. They can care less about the students or certification
 
JR said:
It's not. If they were. It would have happened already. Look at how they just hit UAPB. I think they have no clue on what to do.
Click to expand...

OH!! I think they do know what to do. They're just giving you all time to clean your mess before they drop the hammer. But it seems that your clueless Admins are sitting with their thumbs up their butts thinking that they're not going to do anything and that they (NCAA) don't know what to do about all this.
 
Well beans everyone here just about know how much you know of anything.
 
Last edited:



You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top