Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I keep hearing folks say Dallas will be better in the short term. I just don't see it (they're currently the No. 8 seed in the West)—not after trading away their best player and leaving Dallas with just one offensive creator, Kyrie.
LeBron and Luka will feast because LeBron has no problem deferring to anyone and thriving in the playmaking role.
Is this the same Kyle that refused a trade to Dallas last year because he wanted his money more than a trip to the NBA finals?
How could they get a ransom? His contract would be up, he could have not signed a new contract and walked away. The Mavs would have had ZERO leverage.That's stupid because they could have gotten a ransom for Luka instead of 2 players and 1 first round pick they can't use until 2029.
You honestly think Luka would have walked away from a $350 million super max?How could they get a ransom? His contract would be up, he could have not signed a new contract and walked away. The Mavs would have had ZERO leverage.
Nope, Luka would have absolutely taken the bag. But what if the Mavs didn't offer him a super max contract? He could say no thank you and walk away. What would Dallas get in that scenario?You honestly think Luka would have walked away from a $350 million super max?
Many of the Mavericks' statements post-trade sound like attempts to smear Luka's reputation and rationalize trading one of the three best players in the league (just starting his prime), who was the catalyst behind the franchise's being a championship contender.Nope, Luka would have absolutely taken the bag. But what if the Mavs didn't offer him a super max contract? He could say no thank you and walk away. What would Dallas get in that scenario?
Luka, is an exceptionally talented scorer, but he is not a leader. An upper mid market team like the Mavericks can not afford to give a super max contract to a guy that is not committed to the game and the team.
Their have been rumblings of Luka's behavior and attitude towards the game for some time now.
No one on the team or in Mavs management have been able to get through to Luka. I hope LJ can help him become a leader and superstar he has the potential to become.
I truly believe this move will work out for the Mavs. The revamped team already looked better until all 4 bigs got injured. Which looks suspicious to me. I'm wondering if it's a team tank to improve draft positions.
Go Mavs!
Is it possible the team could be offering their honest assessment?Many of the Mavericks' statements post-trade sound like attempts to smear Luka's reputation and rationalize trading one of the three best players in the league (just starting his prime), who was the catalyst behind the franchise's being a championship contender.
Yep and player also take their talent to South Beach leaving a team high and dry. You just don't get it. The Mave can not afford to pay a player a super max contract that is not a sure thing. They would not be able to pay many others. Luka is not a 1 man show. He only plays one end of the court and exhibits no leadership.Throughout NBA history, star players have clashed with coaches, GMs, and owners. They've been difficult, engaged in power struggles, and mercurial. But those franchises understood that those players' value to winning (at least the elite-level guys like Luka) and to the organization from a reputation and economic standpoint mattered a whole lot more than anything.
Do some research it's out there.Unless Luka was flagrantly insubordinate like Jimmy Butler, you have to work through whatever issues were present.
You don't need to.I just don't see how it all works out as a win-now move, as Nico Harrison said, considering you trade Luka within the conference to a team that now could prevent you from winning a championship for years to come.
Front offices are rarely honest with fanbases and the media about the state of players or their organizations. Many try just to save face for the questionable moves or decisions they make.Is it possible the team could be offering their honest assessment?
You're comparing a free agent, who has the right to go anywhere, to a player under contract. Nico Harrison said himself that Luka gave no indication he didn't want to be in Dallas long term.Yep and player also take their talent to South Beach leaving a team high and dry. You just don't get it.
But the Mavs could afford to trade their star player in exchange for an older guy with an extensive injury history ... who, not surprisingly, is now injured.The Mave can not afford to pay a player a super max contract that is not a sure thing. They would not be able to pay many others. Luka is not a 1 man show. He only plays one end of the court and exhibits no leadership.
Hey Lil Buddy, be quiet when grown folks are talking.But the Mavs could afford to trade their star player in exchange for an older guy with an extensive injury history ... who, not surprisingly, is now injured.
The Mavs' handling of the post-Luka trade with these leaks is less professional now than whatever the organization accused him of.Hey Lil Buddy, be quiet when grown folks are talking.
![]()
Luka Doncic was reportedly traded partially because of his love of hookah and beer
The Mavericks made perhaps the most shocking trade in NBA history because Luka Doncic has a 'taste' for smoking hookah and drinking beer.ftw.usatoday.com
Still as I said long ago, their was a reason Luka needed to leave Dallas. No one on the team or in management could get through to him. For Luka to become the superstar he could be; he needs to be with someone bigger than him that can yank his chain like LeBron. That's why I said this trade is partially to benefit Luka and why only the Lakers were an option.The Mavs' handling of the post-Luka trade with these leaks is less professional now than whatever the organization accused him of.