Grounds for Ejection???


That was a BUSH LEAGUE CHEAP SHOT!!! Some of you people take your subjectivity wayyyyyyyyy to far. That was a damn good call by the officials. The call also served notice that the officials would not let the game get out of hand. His arse should have been put out of the COUNTRY for that FLAGRANT (operative word) arse hit!!! Understand, I am no Grambling fan. That hit was bullish. If I had the power, his arse would go str8 to JAIL for that DIRTY ish. I hope this is not the type of "stuff" AJ is teaching, otherwise perhaps he needs to coach in a BUSH LEAGUE.
 
AnnaMae you got your a-- kicked so enough with the officiating.
Explain why times you were in the red zone and couldn't score. The times you couldn't move the ball against Grambling's defense. The turnovers. Talk about that...Oh by the way, I hope you had a good time in Bumblingham because that's the last time you will be there.....The road to the SWAC goes through Jackson from now on!!!!!!!!!!:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
 



Originally posted by CurtDog 1971
AnnaMae you got your a-- kicked so enough with the officiating.
Explain why times you were in the red zone and couldn't score. The times you couldn't move the ball against Grambling's defense. The turnovers. Talk about that...Oh by the way, I hope you had a good time in Bumblingham because that's the last time you will be there.....The road to the SWAC goes through Jackson from now on!!!!!!!!!!:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
Click to expand...

It goes through Jackson, huh? :look:
Y'all say that every year! :D

:idea:

Well...if that was the case, we wouldn't have made to the SCG in 2000 OR 2002 if this were true.

I guess that pisses all over your logic, huh? :lol:

And why are you on here talking, anyway??? :xeye:

For a team that got 60+ points bust on them by Gram...you sure do have a lot to say....:smh:
 
Originally posted by CurtDog 1971
Oh by the way, I hope you had a good time in Bumblingham because that's the last time you will be there.....
Click to expand...


You need to come up with something new, cunt dog! That one is jsut a bit worn out!


Boy, I tell you this n.s.m. is sadder than sad! :smh:
 
Originally posted by AAMU Alum



You need to come up with something new, cunt dog! That one is jsut a bit worn out!


Boy, I tell you this n.s.m. is sadder than sad! :smh:
Click to expand...

Still no answer to why you lost other than the officiating...Bama hick
 
He's Right

Originally posted by CurtDog 1971
The road to the SWAC goes through Jackson from now on!!!!!!!!!!:[/B]
Click to expand...

Curt Dog,
You are absolutely right I like many other Grambling fans drove right through Jackson from Louisiana on our way to Gramblingham.

Btw did you and Gr get a chance to sit on Santa's lap while Christmas shopping at County Line Mall on Saturday:D
 
BLah-dow!!!

Originally posted by ICEICE5


Curt Dog,
You are absolutely right I like many other Grambling fans drove right through Jackson from Louisiana on our way to Gramblingham.
Click to expand...

:lmao: :lmao: :lmao:

That was pretty good! :D
 
the call was pure BS

Turner's only foul was that it was an obvious pass interference. It was not helmet to helmet. For all of you that think it was, you need your eyes check. The only thing that he did was stick his shoulder in his chest. Football is a contact sport and the chances of a career ending injury can happen at any time during a game or practice. If you watched the play, Turner came from near the middle of the field offering help so he never looked at the ball because he was playing catch up, not trying to take someone out.

It was a bad call by the refs.


Later in the game, a GSU defensive player hit Neal Lindsey on the sideline and drove him ten plus yards off the field and over a players bench. The only penalty rendered was a personal foul. If you watch this particular play, it seemed way more serious than Turner's incident. Lindsey leg looked to have almost gotten caught between the seat and the back of the bench.

No one is taking from the fact that in the end, the better team won. However, once again the SWAC officials showed why everyone criticizes them so
 
WHAT HE SAID.........:tup: :tup: :tup:


BTW WBISHOP.....
How is the attack mouse doing these days????
 
Re: Re: He should have been kicked out

Originally posted by Ntelekt
:look:

You see???
BS like this is why folks on here don't like you....:smh:
Click to expand...

Do it seems like I really care? Man, that guy should be kicked out the league for an intentional hit like that. If anyone hit someone early like that before the ball gets there, I will be the spokesperson to getting them not only ejected, but suspended. And I dont care if anyone like what Im saying, me, or not. And the point of the matter is whether or not he was ejected or left in the game; you all would have lost.

And that my friend is the BOTTOM line. ;)
 
Originally posted by CurtDog 1971
AnnaMae you got your a-- kicked so enough with the officiating.
Explain why times you were in the red zone and couldn't score. The times you couldn't move the ball against Grambling's defense. The turnovers. Talk about that...Oh by the way, I hope you had a good time in Bumblingham because that's the last time you will be there
Click to expand...

And there you have it!
 
It's beyond sad when you co-sign anything that cunt dog posts. But then again, I am talking about YOU! :smh:



You n.s.m. geeks are a riot! :lol:
 



For those of you that saw the game on TV, did yall hear Don McPhersons dumb ass make another dumb ass statement? You would think that someone that played QB in college woud know the rules for a completion in a college game.

The Grambling player caught the ball and came down out of bounds without getting a foot down. This idiot says, "if the refs determine that he would have come down in bounds, they can give him the catch." That can not be farther from the truth. In college you must get a foot down in bounds regardless.

During the CCC when the SU player made a catch and got a foot down, that idiot said that a player must get two feet down in college in the end zone but only one foot in the regular field of play.

Im not a rocket scientist, but I aint this damn stupid. Anybody that casually watches college football knows these simple rules except this idiot. When are we going to get enough of this c**n Calling Buffoonary? Now Im not the one that cares what other people think...but this crap is waaay below average.
 
I'm still waiting to hear what you guys have to say about that late hit on Neal Lindsey, the safety that should have been called ( the nose of the ball was placed on the goal line), the no call when Shearls (WR) was dragged to the ground, the holding that should have resulted in a safety at the end of the game, etc...
 
What does it matter

A-Dog

Nothing is going to be said about those questionable calls and no calls by the refs. You know why, because Blueballs and Cunt Dog are going to do nothing but harp on the fact that we still loss. Which we did in deed do, but do you want to know what the best thing is though? They are spending all this time talking about how much we suck and the new talk for next season has already started "the road to the championship comes through Jackson"

Our season just ended Saturday in the SWAC Championship Game against a far better Grambling team. The Bulldogs were simply a bunch of overacheivers who believed in themselves.

While these guys are downing us, they should keep quiet. Grambling put 60 on them this season, while they could only manage 23 and 31 against us twice.

So save your knuckles from metacarpel syndrome and don't waste your time responding to these knuckleheads.

"WE WERE THERE. HOW ABOUT YOU?"
 
Re: Re: Re: He should have been kicked out

Originally posted by Blacknbengal


Man, that guy should be kicked out the league for an intentional hit like that. If anyone hit someone early like that before the ball gets there, I will be the spokesperson to getting them not only ejected, but suspended. And I dont care if anyone like what Im saying, me, or not. And the point of the matter is whether or not he was ejected or left in the game; you all would have lost.

And that my friend is the BOTTOM line. ;)
Click to expand...

I am with you on that one man..... I saw the hit from the box and was MAD... Anderson is by Boy.. You can't hit a Grambling Man like that an expect to WIN..

Royal One
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: He should have been kicked out

Originally posted by Royal One
I am with you on that one man..... I saw the hit from the box and was MAD... Anderson is by Boy.. You can't hit a Grambling Man like that an expect to WIN..

Royal One
Click to expand...

Hello Your Highness! :wavey:
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: He should have been kicked out

Originally posted by Royal One


I am with you on that one man..... I saw the hit from the box and was MAD... Anderson is by Boy.. You can't hit a Grambling Man like that an expect to WIN..

Royal One
Click to expand...


*sigh*

Spoken like a person who loves Gram....but doesn't understand football... :lol: :smh:
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: He should have been kicked out

Originally posted by Ntelekt



*sigh*

Spoken like a person who loves Gram....but doesn't understand football... :lol: :smh:
Click to expand...

So true. :lmao:
 
The tackle on Piggott in the endzone could have gone either way.
It seemed that the got the ball back into the field of play before he personally was tackled in the endzone. I didn't see the tackle out of bounds that went over the table. But even without seeing it, unless the players became "engaged" on the field of play and their momentum prevented them from stopping then flag but no ejection. However if the player "continued" through with the play and tackled him them yes the foul should be given and also ejection.

Some of the other stuff I actually did not see because I was actually back and forth between awake and sleep. I knew the outcome so I didn't watch it intently.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top