Journalist
Listen up maggots! And that's an order!
I believe the Ivy League's non-participation in postseason football was enacted in 1945, partly based on not accepting segregationist funds from bowl games
http://www.college-sports-journal.c...-simple-the-ivy-playoff-ban-is-discrimination
The Ivy League presidents purposefully wished to define postseason games as "sectional or other championships", which can only mean one thing - football bowls, and nothing else.
After all, when you take away AAU games, NCAA championships, international rowing meets and ECAC wrestling meets and hockey games, what, praytell, is left?
At that time, many bowl games at the time took place in the segregated Jim Crow south, where African-Americans couldn't stay with white teammates and couldn't eat in the same venues in many cases. There were very good moral and ethical reasons for banning postseason bowls in that era - and it actually something that is worth commending - the Ivy League didn't succumb to segregationist money.
http://www.college-sports-journal.c...-simple-the-ivy-playoff-ban-is-discrimination