It's not simply an implication, it's a fact. The playoffs don't make money. Traditional playoff powers such as Montana, Montana State and just recently Towson have admitted as much. This game WILL pay. Thus, the participants (as well as the conferences) WILL make money.
Why is it that we want to devalue the very things that make us culturally unique simply because it is not accepted by the mainstream? For those that are against this move, it appears to be based simply on race and the plea for acceptance; completely ignoring the financial ramification that are involved.
Contrary to what some of you think, there isn't a (mainstream) collegiate conference or athletic program that isn't doing what's in their best interest. And for all intents and purposes, they are "segregating" themselves whenever and wherever possible for the money.
The IVY League has segregated itself from the playoffs, but they are not complaining.
The BCS conferences (when the BCS was still functioning) segregated themselves from the NCAA - making millions - and we ALL sat right there in front of our TV sets taking it all in. There are still people who think that Florida State was crowed national champions by the NCAA...and that simply isn't true. The NCAA doesn't even OFFICIALLY recognize Florida State as the national champions. And do you see the members of the Pac-12, SEC, BIG, Big 12 and ACC complaining about being segregated? Hell no.
We've even read Southland Conference coaches say they wish they could produce a conference championship game, but they know they can't.
Ultimately, the ADs and conference commissioners of these programs are responsible for one thing...making money. So why in the hell do any of you MEAC folk have a problem with your ADs and commissioners trying to make money for your programs especially when it is well documented that they are on hard times?
Respectfully, I ask, what am I missing?
I respect your opinions. and you make good points.
you mention the ivy league schools sepreating themselves. you are right. they are doing what is best for them in their determination.
and you are right. Our conference leadership has come up with an idea that he feels will make some money. and maybe it will.
again....nowhere have you seen me say the game shouldn't happen. I believe that it should.
just not by forcing the meac to give up the autobid.
you mention conferences doing what is in their best interest. You may be right. I, and most SCSU fans, don't feel that what the SWAC feels is in their best interest, is in our best interest. That's all.
The SWAC doesn't feel the playoffs are in its best interest. so they forgo the autobid to instead play a conference championship. no problem.
The SWAC, or apparently most of its presidents feels that the HBCU title game would be the best route. cool.....they have a right to their opinion.
So far, this game hasn't happened because the meac hasn't voted in support of it. So up until now, the MEAC conference hasn't felt that its whats best. Apparently, the commissioner may have, or be close to having enough votes. and lets assume he does, there is still asignifigant number of schools who don't agree.
so assuming that SCSU is one of the schools that doesn't agree, and assuming despite this, the vote passes, then SCSU will explore other options. Because that's what SCSU feels is in its best interest. So why is that wrong?
I have never said the game is a bad idea. just forcing the champ to play in it. Everyone should do what is in their best interest. But HBCUs are not one entity. There are dozens of them, each with their own set of criteria of whats important to them or in their best interest. One size doesn't always fit all.
So for the schools that feel this game is in their best interest, God bless them. But my question to you Ken is, why is it that schools that do not agree are criticized, or accused of trying to satify white people. We just don't agree. And that should be okay. We don't all have to agree all of the time.