Way Past Time to Clean Up BCS Mess: School Presidents, Greed Ruin College Football


b8sball17

Member
http://aolsvc.news.aol.com/sports/article.adp?id=20041202125109990001

There used to be a phrase in college football that had great meaning: New Year's Day bowl. In those days, there were four of them --The Cotton, The Orange, The Sugar and, "the grand-daddy of them all," The Rose.

For many years, the first three were played early in the afternoon with the Rose being played last. Then, in 1965, the Orange Bowl moved to NBC and became a night game meaning that if you really loved college football, you could sit in front of your TV from 1:30 in the afternoon until 11:30 at night; flipping between the Cotton and the Sugar early in the day before hunkering down to watch the Rose and the Orange later. Then, in 1982, the Sugar Bowl became a night game too, but that was OK because there was still 10 hours of football. In fact, in order to keep its tripleheader intact, NBC moved the then relatively new Fiesta Bowl into the old Sugar Bowl slot. So, there were five New Year's Day games.

Was the system perfect? No. Bowl committees routinely made backroom deals in early November, often committing to teams that would end up with three or four losses. Conference tie-ins made it almost impossible to match the No. 1 and No. 2 teams in a national championship game and split national championships were as much the rule as the exception. But there was a sense of tradition; the notion that Jan. 1 was the end of the college football season and that the 10 teams playing on that day had done something special to play in a New Year's Day bowl.

Then, as with all things in sports, tradition went out the window. Bowl games sold themselves -- and their souls -- to corporate America and games began cropping up on New Year's Day like grapes in a winery.

One bowl named for a restaurant simply plunked itself down on New Year's Day and began calling itself a New Year's Day bowl. Everyone with an ugly jacket in his closet across America decided to start a bowl game and corporations lined up to slap their names onto the games.

Out of this morass came the Bowl Championship Series, undoubtedly the worst invention to come along since new Coke. There's only one difference between the BCS and new Coke: the people at Coke knew a bad idea when they saw it (and tasted it) and pulled the plug sooner rather than later.

(click the link for the rest of the article).
 
Re: Way Past Time to Clean Up BCS Mess: School Presidents, Greed Ruin College Footb

<a href='http://www.smileycentral.com/?partner=ZSzeb008_ZCxdm411YYUS' target='_blank'><img src='http://smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/36/36_2_25.gif' border=0></a><a href='http://www.smileycentral.com/?partner=ZSzeb008_ZCxdm411YYUS' target='_blank'><img src='http://smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/36/36_2_25.gif' border=0></a><a href='http://www.smileycentral.com/?partner=ZSzeb008_ZCxdm411YYUS' target='_blank'><img src='http://smileys.smileycentral.com/cat/36/36_2_25.gif' border=0></a>
 



Re: Way Past Time to Clean Up BCS Mess: School Presidents, Greed Ruin College Footb

Not an AOL member so I could not read the whole article, but I like what I've seen so far.
 
Re: Way Past Time to Clean Up BCS Mess: School Presidents, Greed Ruin College Footb

http://aolsvc.news.aol.com/sports/article.adp?id=20041202125109990001



In the case of the BCS, the presidents who invented it are a little bit like most of the people standing in the streets gawking at the Emperor's new clothes. They all know the damn Emperor is buck naked but they keep thinking if they ooh and aah enough the rest of us will actually believe the clothes are beautiful.

Now, there is almost no meaning to playing in a New Year's Day bowl. In fact, the two biggest bowls aren't even played on New Year's Day, they're played two and three days later.

Texas is playing in the Rose Bowl when it should be in the (old) Cotton Bowl and the current Cotton Bowl has become a second-tier bowl that remains on New Year's Day only because those who run it are willing to start the game at 10AM local time. Where have you gone Lindsey Nelson?

So here's what we have in college football: the tradition of the New Year's bowls is long-gone; corporate America has completely taken over the games and the BCS, allegedly created to find a true national champion each year, routinely fails to do that.

Last week, the Associated Press announced that it would no longer take part in the sham that is the BCS and demanded that the BCS stop using its poll of writers and broadcasters as part of the system that chooses the teams for the BCS bowls. Unfortunately, the AP handled the situation clumsily, making the foolish claim that the BCS never had permission to use the poll. Clearly, that wasn't true.

The AP could have written a cease and desist letter like the one it wrote at any time, so to claim that the BCS was not authorized to use the poll, is just silly. More important, it distracts people from the real issue, which is the AP's decision to withdraw from a process that is fraudulent and should probably be declared illegal.

Yes, illegal. The 63 BCS schools are a cartel that has created a system which makes it impossible for anyone who is not a member of their group to compete for a national championship. Last year, under pressure from Congress, the BCS decided to add a fifth bowl -- throwing a bone to the non-BCS schools so they would back off from Congress and possible legal action. Give the presidents credit; they know how to manipulate people. By guaranteeing the non-BCS presidents a cut of the pie, they have co-opted them, giving them a nice check to shut up and go away.

The worst part is that nothing appears likely to deter the presidents from continuing to foist this farce off on the public -- not to mention the players and coaches who are victimized by the system. Some thought that the AP's decision to pull out might be a first step toward ending the BCS. Wrong. The presidents have already cut a deal with Fox to continue the BCS for four more years when the current contract with ABC runs out after the 2006 season.

The only reason ABC didn't re-up is because it didn't like the idea of the fifth bowl; the one that the non-BCS schools will be consigned to. Understand this: the fifth bowl does NOT add another round of games. Under the new system, this year's national championship matchup would be exactly the same with Auburn on the outside looking in. The only difference would be that Utah would be consigned to the new bowl where it would play Boise State or Louisville.

In short, they will just create a more lucrative version of the Liberty Bowl -- and ensure that no "real," BCS team has to mingle with a non-BCS plebian ala this year's Fiesta Bowl. It is college football's version of separate but equal.

Even though it will do nothing to deter the Presidents from their appointed money-grabbing, both USA Today and ESPN should follow the AP's lead and remove themselves from any further involvement with the coaches poll.

That poll is as much of a sham as the BCS is. The coaches are allowed to vote in anonymity and many of them have clear-cut conflicts of interest because MILLIONS of dollars are at stake for their schools, not to mention bonuses for them if their team gets into a BCS bowl or the national championship game.

In the final coaches poll of the season, there were two mysterious eighth place votes for California, which was battling Texas for the final BCS spot. No one will say who those votes came from. Mack Brown, the coach at Texas and his brother Watson Brown, the coach at UAB, both have votes in that poll. Did they vote Cal eighth? Maybe not. If not, their ballots should be released as should all the ballots so that the two voters who voted Cal eighth can explain how they reached that conclusion.

If ESPN and USA Today pull out, that won't stop the coaches poll from existing or the BCS from using it if it so desires. But it will send a message that needs to be sent: if you want to continue this farce, go ahead, but we won't be a part of it. ESPN, which lives for self-promotion almost certainly won't withdraw. USA Today, which considers itself a legitimate news-gathering organization should get out -- NOW.

This has been said over and over but I will say it one more time: there's not a single reason on earth to not have a playoff. You can have eight teams, 12 teams or 16 teams and almost no class time will be missed by the participants. The NCAA is likely to pass a rule next year allowing teams to schedule 12 regular season games. That will mean that teams which play in leagues that have a championship game will play 14 games -- something many of them did the last two seasons when the calendar allowed teams the option to play 12 games. That pretty much removes any argument the presidents might make about players being asked to play too many games. An 11-game regular season with a playoff that would last a MAXIMUM of four games for the two finalists would mean no added burden on the players.

The scheduling would be simple: First-round games in a 12- or 16-team playoff the first week in December; quarterfinals on New Year's Day; semis a week later, championship game the weekend between the NFL conference championships and the Super Bowl. Amount of school missed: close to zero and not even a fraction of what basketball players miss during the NCAA basketball tournament.

If there's a first round, play the games at home sites to make seeding important. Play the ensuing games at bowl sites; rotate the games each year among the Rose, Sugar, Orange, Fiesta, Cotton, Citrus and Gator Bowls. Let the other bowls continue as they always have; as the prize for America's 6-5 teams.

At the moment we have the worst of both worlds: the tradition of New Year's Day is gone. Bowls named after restaurants shouldn't be played on New Year's Day; the Cotton Bowl shouldn't be played at 10 a.m. between two teams that were also-rans in their conferences and Texas doesn't belong in The Rose Bowl any more than Southern California belongs in The Orange Bowl.

So, the charm of New Year's Day is gone and in its place we have a system which does NOT produce a national champion; which is NOT fair in any way shape or form and which is allowed to continue to exist because a cartel of hypocrites is allowed to continue to perpetuate it.

Recently, when I was making these points on a radio show, the host said to me: "But surely you would concede this is better than the old system, right?"

My answer was to say that segregation was an improvement on slavery, but that didn't make it right.

I have now re-thought that position. No, not because my analogy was a stretch -- even though it was. I have concluded that the new system isn't better than the old one. The new system is an absolute corporate sellout; it has robbed New Year's day of its charm and has only brought college football slightly closer to deciding a true national champion without getting it anywhere close to actually doing so.

There's nothing good about the BCS. Nothing. And yet, it isn't going away anytime soon. That's a crime and there are 63 criminals -- and their henchmen (conference commissioners; TV networks; corporate dolts) -- on the loose.

Someone needs to stop them.

Has anyone got John McCain's phone number?
 
Re: Way Past Time to Clean Up BCS Mess: School Presidents, Greed Ruin College Footb

I really don't agree with a lot of this article, but I will post another thread about it later, but the most outragous thing in it is
and almost no class time will be missed by the participants. .... The scheduling would be simple: First-round games in a 12- or 16-team playoff the first week in December;
Idiot, that is the time that most schools have thier final exams. Right now, the regular season ends for most schools on the last week in Nov. The bowl games are after exams are over. Can a playoff be done, yes, but don't make a misleading statement like that.
 
Re: Way Past Time to Clean Up BCS Mess: School Presidents, Greed Ruin College Footb

Lewis said:
... that is the time that most schools have thier final exams. Right now, the regular season ends for most schools on the last week in Nov. ...
It works for D-III, D-II, I-AA... again, why wouldn't it work for I-A?
 
Re: Way Past Time to Clean Up BCS Mess: School Presidents, Greed Ruin College Footb

They need a playoff system. This could last all the way up to January 3rd...
 
Re: Way Past Time to Clean Up BCS Mess: School Presidents, Greed Ruin College Footb

Ralph said:
It works for D-III, D-II, I-AA... again, why wouldn't it work for I-A?

It also seems to work in all other NCAA events.
 
Re: Way Past Time to Clean Up BCS Mess: School Presidents, Greed Ruin College Footb

Ralph said:
It works for D-III, D-II, I-AA... again, why wouldn't it work for I-A?

Don't you think the new graduation legislation is trying to clear up your question "why wouldn't it work for 1-A?" The demands are so great on the student athletes that academics is not a major concern as long as coaches can get two years out of a player.
 
Re: Way Past Time to Clean Up BCS Mess: School Presidents, Greed Ruin College Footb

cat daddy said:
It also seems to work in all other NCAA events.


Co-Sign. Funny how the college Presidents and the NCAA aint worried about how much class the basketball players miss during the season and during March Madness. hypocrites. :shame:
 
Re: Way Past Time to Clean Up BCS Mess: School Presidents, Greed Ruin College Footb

Someone may have stated this already. But it is not just the BCS that is a mess. Division 1-A football has always been a mess even before the BCS was formed.
 
Re: Way Past Time to Clean Up BCS Mess: School Presidents, Greed Ruin College Footb

Why does the SWAC not play in 1AA playoffs?

Does a true NCAA championship game really matter?

Shouldn't schools play games that benefit them financially (i.e. turkey day classic, bayou classic, SCG, etc.)?

Should the SWAC and it's schools modify schedules to compete in the 1AA playoffs?
 
Re: Way Past Time to Clean Up BCS Mess: School Presidents, Greed Ruin College Footb

I do not see that there is much wrong with the BCS. We seem to forget that if there were no BCS, we would have 3 teams playing in 3 separate bowl games and could end up with 3 undefeated teams (OU, USC, & Auburn).

I myself an not in favor of a playoff system simply because you would have the same argument. By that I mean, if you pair off #1 and #2, then #3 would be mad. If you had a playoff system with 8 teams, then the 9th team would be mad. If it were 16 teams, then the 17th team would be mad.

We had 64 teams in March Madness in basketball, then they had to add a 65th team to make somebody happy. Lets be very real here. There is a big difference between #1 and #16 in college football. Lets not waste any time.

Let the BCS continue to pair what they think are the top 2 in college football in the championship game.

Secondly, I've said all along that the AP and coaches poll is a joke. It is impossible to be ranked before you play any games.
 
Re: Way Past Time to Clean Up BCS Mess: School Presidents, Greed Ruin College Footb

Da_Sperm said:
I do not see that there is much wrong with the BCS. We seem to forget that if there were no BCS, we would have 3 teams playing in 3 separate bowl games and could end up with 3 undefeated teams (OU, USC, & Auburn).

.....

This would be true. If they, the unbeaten teams, won, we would really have a mess.

I will agree that the BCS is very far from perfect. It is a mess this year. But I will take a championship game (in this case the Orange Bowl) over what existed earlier.
 



Re: Way Past Time to Clean Up BCS Mess: School Presidents, Greed Ruin College Footb

Ralph said:
It works for D-III, D-II, I-AA... again, why wouldn't it work for I-A?
I didn't say it couldn't work, I just said that was a misleading statement. I agree with the Da Sperm. I will post more later.
 
Re: Way Past Time to Clean Up BCS Mess: School Presidents, Greed Ruin College Footb

JR said:
Co-Sign. Funny how the college Presidents and the NCAA aint worried about how much class the basketball players miss during the season and during March Madness. hypocrites. :shame:
Correct me if I am wrong, but I think baseball is even worse than basketball as it relates to games played and classes missed.
 
Re: Way Past Time to Clean Up BCS Mess: School Presidents, Greed Ruin College Footb

SAME OLD G said:
Correct me if I am wrong, but I think baseball is even worse than basketball as it relates to games played and classes missed.

Big time.

Plus, doesn't the baseball postseason coincide with Spring finals?

Also, there are 64 teams involved in the NCAA baseball tourney. A football playoff would only involve 8 or 16 max.

:topic:

Mike Tirico said last night at the Sugar Bowl that "no team has ever played in the BCS title game in a year it played a I-AA team".

Uh, Mike, what about LSU vs. Western Illinois just last year?

:topic: :topic:

I've also heard advocates for a "plus one" system which would settle things after the Bowls. Well, that's fine for Auburn and the USC/OU winner, but what about Utah?
 
Re: Way Past Time to Clean Up BCS Mess: School Presidents, Greed Ruin College Footb

SAME OLD G said:
Correct me if I am wrong, but I think baseball is even worse than basketball as it relates to games played and classes missed.

I think you are right on that one.
 
Re: Way Past Time to Clean Up BCS Mess: School Presidents, Greed Ruin College Footb

Baseball in the Spring is the worst, but the playoffs are typcially after the spring semester ends. Classes usually end the 1st week of May and exams are the 2nd week. So they out of school by playoff time. But during the regular season, they play 40+ games, the most of damn near any sport I know.

But you are only talking about ~25 kids with baseball. With football, 60-70 players, 150 or more in the band, and the rest of the traveling group (cheerleaders, SGA, etc.)
 
Back
Top