The Democrats suck..





Yep. These mofo's have no balls. They let the repubs push them around everytime. Sad. It's all down hill now for them.
 
I tried to tell yall the American people don't take too lightly when any man is trying to raise their taxes. These folks are known to rebel and are willing to die to fight against high taxation.

If I were a Democrat, I wouldn't want Obama showing up campaigning for me. The best thing a Dem candidate can do is show opposition to Obama. This would please Americans, and once they get the vote, then they can show approval of Obama's policies.
 
ROYAL BLUE said:
I tried to tell yall the American people don't take too lightly when any man is trying to raise their taxes. These folks are known to rebel and are willing to die to fight against high taxation.
Click to expand...

That's nothing but a scare tactic......by the Tea Baggers and Repubs.....

And in the back of our heads we really know what's it really all about.
 
Fiyah said:
That's nothing but a scare tactic......by the Tea Baggers and Repubs.....

And in the back of our heads we really know what's it really all about.
Click to expand...

I don't think it is that bruh.. I think Martha sucked as a candidate....
 
jsupop33 said:
How the hell do you lose Massachusetts?
Click to expand...

By being arrogant and cocky.
That seat has been looked at as a "given" for almost 50 years.
Ole girl just sat back and thought she had an automatic win.

Dude just ran a good campaign and took advantage of her being lazy.
He didn't say anything crazy or racial.
He kept pointing out the fact that the seat they was running for is not KENNEDYS SEAT, it was the people's seat along with healthcare and that registered with a lot of those independent voters up there.
 
Last edited:
players said:
By being arrogant and cocky.
That seat has been looked at as a "given" for almost 50 years.
Ole girl just sat back and thought she had an automatic win.

Dude just ran a good campaign and took advantage of her being lazy.
He didn't say anything crazy or racial.
He kept pointing out the fact that the seat they was running for is not KENNEDYS SEAT, it was the people's seat along with healthcare and that registered with a lot of those independent voters up there.
Click to expand...

I agree 1000000000% how in THE HELL do you take 2 weeks in the middle of your campaign? :kaioken::kaioken::kaioken:

The irony of it all is Scott Brown voted for Universal Healthcare for the people of Massachusetts but is about to vote against it for the people in the rest of the US. :retard:
 
JSU*Toi said:
I agree 1000000000% how in THE HELL do you take 2 weeks in the middle of your campaign? :kaioken::kaioken::kaioken:

The irony of it all is Scott Brown voted for Universal Healthcare for the people of Massachusetts but is about to vote against it for the people in the rest of the US. :retard:
Click to expand...

Health Care in Massachusetts isn't what people thought it would be neither..


In March 2008 the Boston Globe reported that some "safety-net" hospitals serving low-income individuals in urban areas were facing budget shortfalls due to the combination of reduced "free-care" payments from the state and low enrollment in Commonwealth Care. The reduced state payments anticipated that by reducing the number of uninsured people Commonwealth Care would reduce the amount of charity care provided by hospitals.[45] In a subsequent story that same month the Globe reported that Commonwealth Care faced a short-term funding gap of $100 million and the need to obtain a new three-year funding commitment from the federal government of $1.5 billion. The Globe reported that a number of alternatives were under consideration for raising additional funding, including a $1 per pack increase in the state's cigarette tax. Health care costs in the state were rising at an annual rate of 10 percent, and the state budget deficit was $1.3 billion.[46]

In April 2008, a dissertation by a student in partial completion of his PhD requirements was published analyzing the impact of Massachusetts approach to health financing reform, insurance mandates, on the rate of new business starts was completed.[47] The study found that new business starts were reduced in Massachusetts by 16%, and that this reduction included displacement of new firm starts across the state line into New Hampshire. In addition, the study found some evidence that this effect did not vary based on the size of the firm, but may have had a more negative effect on new businesses owned by women. The study's author suggested that were this approach to become a model of national health finance reform, that it would have an especially profound impact on physically small states such as those in New England where jurisdictional arbitrage is potentially a practical consideration for entrepreneurs. The study does not appear to control for other economic factors such as the start of a global recession; the new business data driving the study was collected in summer and fall of 2007 from a direct marketing database that takes up to 9 months to update.

Massachusetts' problem of overcrowded waiting rooms and overworked primary-care physicians (who were already in short supply) has been exacerbated by the influx of patients now covered.One criticism of the program is that it has done nothing to realign incentives for MDs to provide primary care.[48].[49]
Click to expand...


Maybe he trying to correct his mistakes he made in Massachusetts
 
JSU*Toi said:
I agree 1000000000% how in THE HELL do you take 2 weeks in the middle of your campaign? :kaioken::kaioken::kaioken:

The irony of it all is Scott Brown voted for Universal Healthcare for the people of Massachusetts but is about to vote against it for the people in the rest of the US. :retard:
Click to expand...

I think his angle on that was he is not necessarily voting against Universal health care but he was voting against the bill as a whole because of the special deals that were added to it.
He said he didn't want a bill that would add extra taxes for things that don't benifit the people of Massachusetts.

Example:
All of the other states paying for the entire cost of Nebraska's healthcare cost, training, future expenses, etc., FOREVER.
Under the current deal that got the rep from Nebraskas vote, the people of Nebraska will never pay a dime for anything related to Universal healthcare in that state.
That's just one example of add ons and special deals for votes.
 
Last edited:



The problem is the Dems are showing no back bone. You can say what you want about Bush, but he strong armed the house and senate. You might not like him, but you gotta respect the balls he had. He let them hang and well our buddy is being passive. I didn't like Bush policies, but he was hardcore in the game of politics.
 
players said:
I think his angle on that was he is not necessarily voting against Universal health care but he was voting against the bill as a whole because of the special deals that were added to it.
He said he didn't want a bill that would add extra taxes for things that don't benifit the people of Massachusetts.

Example:
All of the other states paying for the entire cost of Nebraska's healthcare cost, training, future expenses, etc., FOREVER.
Under the current deal that got the rep from Nebraskas vote, the people of Nebraska will never pay a dime for anything related to Universal healthcare in that state.
That's just one example of add ons and special deals for votes.
Click to expand...

I agree the Nebraska deal was a bad deal :smh: But wash is alot of those "special" deals he was talking about were GOP add-ons. In the bill as a whole there have been close to 300 amendments that the GOP wanted added to the bill before they voted in favor of the bill. Over 250 of those amendments were added and the GOP is still voting against the bill.
 
CEE DOG said:
The problem is the Dems are showing no back bone. You can say what you want about Bush, but he strong armed the house and senate. You might not like him, but you gotta respect the balls he had. He let them hang and well our buddy is being passive. I didn't like Bush policies, but he was hardcore in the game of politics.
Click to expand...

You are so right ! I hated Bush's policies but his damn politics were gangsta!
 
CEE DOG said:
The problem is the Dems are showing no back bone. You can say what you want about Bush, but he strong armed the house and senate. You might not like him, but you gotta respect the balls he had. He let them hang and well our buddy is being passive. I didn't like Bush policies, but he was hardcore in the game of politics.
Click to expand...

Cee.
This come up every election with me on this board as you know.
You know I have been saying this all along when it come to the Dem's, elections, and having the gut's to do things without political correctness guiding the way.

Funny part is that ole boy is setting himself up to keep that seat and I'll bet the Dem's up there dismiss this as a one hit wonder.
Brown is not huffing and puffing about this being a referendum on OBAMA.
Dude has been telling anyone within mike range that it was not that simple and his win was based on issues and not OBAMA.
He sticking to his message and saying all the right things being careful not to be seen as a far right REPUB. :nod:
 
Last edited:
ROYAL BLUE said:
I tried to tell yall the American people don't take too lightly when any man is trying to raise their taxes. These folks are known to rebel and are willing to die to fight against high taxation.

If I were a Democrat, I wouldn't want Obama showing up campaigning for me. The best thing a Dem candidate can do is show opposition to Obama. This would please Americans, and once they get the vote, then they can show approval of Obama's policies.
Click to expand...

Dude.
This had nothing to do with OBAMA showing up.

She didn't run a good campaign, took a dang break from campaigning during the final run, and the DEMO PARTY watchdogs in Massachusett's didn't do their job either.
Those clowns didn't see or ignored a big lead slipping in 2 weeks time, and didn't sound the alarm for OBAMA and other Washington heavyweight's to come in until 3 or 4 days before the election.

Where do you get your information from?
 
players said:
Dude.
This had nothing to do with OBAMA showing up.

She didn't run a good campaign, took a dang break from campaigning during the final run, and the DEMO PARTY watchdogs in Massachusett's didn't do their job either.
Those clowns didn't see or ignored a big lead slipping in 2 weeks time, and didn't sound the alarm for OBAMA and other Washington heavyweight's to come in until 3 or 4 days before the election.

Where do you get your information from?
Click to expand...


He get it from the EIB network...
 
Another thing is that the Dems haven't figured out how to get minorites to the polls during times when it's not a presidnetal election. This is their bread and butter, yet they sit back and take it lightly. They have got to learn how to show these folks that the Senate and Hosue seats are more important than anything. They ar the ones who put the policies out that our lives and paychecks are affected by. For some reason minorites haven't figured that out. Yeah the President playsa key, but having your party control the house and senate gives you what you need, because in all honesty it is the folks who need the assistance the most who want show up to vote during this time. I mean folks who are in the middle working class are going to survive one way or another, but those on the lower end will suffer and they don't vote because they haven't been educated by the party they rely on.
 
CEE DOG said:
Another thing is that the Dems haven't figured out how to get minorites to the polls during times when it's not a presidnetal election. This is their bread and butter, yet they sit back and take it lightly. They have got to learn how to show these folks that the Senate and Hosue seats are more important than anything. They ar the ones who put the policies out that our lives and paychecks are affected by. For some reason minorites haven't figured that out. Yeah the President playsa key, but having your party control the house and senate gives you what you need, because in all honesty it is the folks who need the assistance the most who want show up to vote during this time. I mean folks who are in the middle working class are going to survive one way or another, but those on the lower end will suffer and they don't vote because they haven't been educated by the party they rely on.
Click to expand...


Cee,
You not lying. As the son of a local elected official, I can tell you that we don't vote. I used to drive a van around on election day and go door to door, picking people up to go vote.
 
Fiyah said:
That's nothing but a scare tactic......by the Tea Baggers and Repubs.....

And in the back of our heads we really know what's it really all about.
Click to expand...

I disagree.

In order for the Dems to do what they're proposing, they have to raise taxes to pay for what they want.

Many events helped cause the American Revolution. It was a terrible war between the colonies of America and the country of England. The three most important events that led up to, and caused it, were the Boston Massacre, The Boston Tea Party, and The Stamp Act.

The Boston Massacre was an encounter on March 5, 1770, that was five years before the American Revolution between British troops and a group of citizens of Boston that were then in the Massachusetts Bay Colony. British troops were quartered in the city to discourage demonstrations againserican Revolution between British troopt the Townshend Acts, a tax on imports to the colonies. http://www.ctbw.com/jones.htm
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top