The Day After Pill.



I think it's a good thing to have available...but I worry about
the ramifications of its use(if it becomes recurring use). As for
over the counter sales, I suppose it should be allowed. The
government shouldn't regulate its use, just it's degree of safety.
If I had a teenager I'd want him/her to have that pill as opposed
to later having to consider an abortion with the longterm
emotional scars that is said to carry.
:o

-Astrya
 



i have a frd to took the pill and she had to go to the local health dept and a counselor will issue the pill. she also states the counselor said that the pill is not a form of birth control and shouldn't be taken often. it dosen' t kill sperm, but makes the cervix, hormones, etc. unstable so that spem cannot settle. when my frd took the pill she was sick for 2 days.

i don't think the constant use of the pill is healthy and may have some long term health issues.

i was at jsu when this happened and am not sure if the pill has been adjusted.
 
there is a lot to consider here

along with the side effects just mentioned, there is also the danger of folks being irresponsible with this option

if used properly, this CAN be a great tool but i see a big danger in a lot of folks being very irresponsible in what he/she does and just thinkgin (i can always take the morning after pill and be ok)

also, this pill doesnt do anything to protect against std's
 
Originally posted by hassan
there is a lot to consider here

along with the side effects just mentioned, there is also the danger of folks being irresponsible with this option

if used properly, this CAN be a great tool but i see a big danger in a lot of folks being very irresponsible in what he/she does and just thinkgin (i can always take the morning after pill and be ok)

also, this pill doesnt do anything to protect against std's

Good points...imagine teenagers using this as as birth control without taking the STD issue into account.
 
Good points.

Some good points here. I didn't even think about the effects of abusing the pill. I was automatically thinking it doesn't have any immediate effects other than somehow aborting the process.

To the specifics of how this pill works: does it work BEFORE or AFTER the sperm and egg have united or does it matter? Also, if you take the pill say a month into pregnancy what happens?:confused:
 
Morning after pill

It will reduce the number of abortions. All over the counter and prescribed medications can be abused and has side effects. The FDA says it's safe and effective. Now, I know some anti-abortion types are opposed to the morning after pill and consider it as aborting a fetus. It reacts like other forms of birth control, i.e. the birth control pill. For me, I have far more trust in the medical profession and the FDA than politicians who will demagogue an issue for votes.
 
Re: Morning after pill

Originally posted by J C
It will reduce the number of abortions. All over the counter and prescribed medications can be abused and has side effects. The FDA says it's safe and effective. Now, I know some anti-abortion types are opposed to the morning after pill and consider it as aborting a fetus. It reacts like other forms of birth control, i.e. the birth control pill. For me, I have far more trust in the medical profession and the FDA than politicians who will demagogue an issue for votes.

? :confused: reduce the number of abortions? it is abortion if it terminates a pregnancy,,, ain't it?? maybe you mean it will reduce the number of abortions in the ____ tri-mester,, or whatever that term is.

true, demagogues thrive on stuff like this.
 
??

Bart: What's the different between the day after pill and the excepted daily birth control pill? It is my understanding they react similarly. Both prevent the fertilization and development of the ovum (egg). I may be wrong, and a female will comment and clarify
 
Re: ??

Originally posted by J C
Bart: What's the different between the day after pill and the excepted daily birth control pill? It is my understanding they react similarly. Both prevent the fertilization and development of the ovum (egg). I may be wrong, and a female will comment and clarify

I dunno. das part of my question. Does the day after pill terminate a union of a sperm and egg or does it prevent the union from happening? das what i was asking. :confused:
 
Re: Re: ??

Originally posted by Bartram
I dunno. das part of my question. Does the day after pill terminate a union of a sperm and egg or does it prevent the union from happening? das what i was asking. :confused:


It prevent the union from happening.
 
Re: Re: Re: ??

Originally posted by JSU*Toi
It prevent the union from happening.

Oh, ok. Then it's just a very powerful, faster acting birth control pill that you have to probably take within so many hours of sex. That doesn't sound like such a big deal then.
 
Re: Good points.

Originally posted by Bartram
Some good points here. I didn't even think about the effects of abusing the pill. I was automatically thinking it doesn't have any immediate effects other than somehow aborting the process.

To the specifics of how this pill works: does it work BEFORE or AFTER the sperm and egg have united or does it matter? Also, if you take the pill say a month into pregnancy what happens?:confused:

This is why sex education and contraceptives should be more readily available. If you take the Morning After Pill while pregnant, nothing happens.

Why are people so afraid of giving women power over their bodies and over reproduction?
 
Re: Re: Morning after pill

Originally posted by Bartram
? :confused: reduce the number of abortions? it is abortion if it terminates a pregnancy,,, ain't it?? maybe you mean it will reduce the number of abortions in the ____ tri-mester,, or whatever that term is.

true, demagogues thrive on stuff like this.

Yes, it has already shown to reduce the number of abortions. Additionally, you need to learn a bit about abortion. Abortion is legal only in the first trimester, and anything later only occurs when the mother's health is threatened.

But you're right, it's not a big deal, but demagogues have already had a field day with it. I read a quote from an anti-choice activist who said that the availability of Plan B would cause women to have an inability to control themselves in sexual situations. The saddest part about that (other than the obvious) is that it was a woman who said it. Talk about a self-loathing complex.
 



Re: Good points.

Originally posted by Bartram
Some good points here. I didn't even think about the effects of abusing the pill. I was automatically thinking it doesn't have any immediate effects other than somehow aborting the process.

To the specifics of how this pill works: does it work BEFORE or AFTER the sperm and egg have united or does it matter? Also, if you take the pill say a month into pregnancy what happens?:confused:

it is supposed to be taken within 12 hours of the "mistake" and the pill is an added hormone that makes the eggs unstable for conception. i think that it is dangerous to take the pill if you are already pregnant. i think they give a preg test before the pill is given.
 
Fed Panel Backs Easier Morning-After Pill
Wed Dec 17, 6:38 AM ET Add Health - AP to My Yahoo!


By LAURAN NEERGAARD, AP Medical Writer

WASHINGTON - Women may soon have an easier way to help prevent pregnancy after unprotected sex now that government advisers have recommended that morning-after birth control should be sold without a doctor's prescription.

"It's extraordinarily safe," said Dr. Alastair Wood of Vanderbilt University, an adviser to the Food and Drug Administration (news - web sites).

In fact, he said, women probably should keep emergency contraception in their medicine cabinet just in case it's ever needed. "We don't tell people to buy a fire extinguisher after the fire started."

The panel on Tuesday voted in favor of over-the-counter sales of emergency contraception amid concerns from anti-abortion critics and worries from others that easier access to morning-after pills may increase unsafe sex, particularly among teenagers.

But proponents argued there was no evidence that emergency contraception lulls women into complacency about regular birth control or disease. They said wider use of the morning-after pill could cut in half the nation's 3 million unintended pregnancies each year and in turn prevent hundreds of thousands of abortions.

"There is a public health imperative to increase access to emergency contraception," said Dr. Vivian Dickerson, president-elect of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

The FDA isn't bound by its advisers' recommendations but usually follows them. A decision is expected in late February.

Asked whether political considerations would be taken into account, FDA Commissioner Mark McClellan said, "We have a lot of information coming in. It's very much a science-based process."

The morning-after pill is simply a higher dose of regular hormonal contraception, and is sold by prescription under the brand names Plan B and Preven. Plan B's manufacturer wants to sell the drug without a prescription, putting it on pharmacy shelves next to the aspirin and cough medicine.

Taken within 72 hours of intercourse, the pills cut the chances of getting pregnant by up to 89 percent. But it can be hard to find a doctor to write a prescription in time, especially on weekends and holidays, contraceptive advocates and the nation's largest gynecologists group told the FDA on Tuesday.

Morning-after pills prevent ovulation or fertilization, and possibly interfere with implantation of a fertilized egg into the uterus, the medical definition of pregnancy.



If a woman already is pregnant, they have no effect. Consequently, emergency contraception hasn't proved nearly as controversial as RU-486 (news - web sites), the abortion pill.

It does have critics who oppose any interference with a fertilized egg, and who argued Tuesday during a daylong hearing that broader access could increase sexually transmitted diseases, especially in teens.

"Without medical advice, use of Plan B by teens will be disastrous," said Dr. John Bruchalski of the Catholic Medical Association.

Some of FDA's advisers did want teen access to nonprescription Plan B restricted, arguing there wasn't enough study of the drug in minors.

Also, "I'm concerned there will be an exploitation of young women's fears about becoming pregnant," leading them to overuse, said panelist Dr. Susan Crockett, a Texas gynecologist.

But the FDA responded that there are no age restrictions on prescription Plan B and that it couldn't enforce any on an over-the-counter version. Other advisers said teens in particular should avoid pregnancy.

The FDA asked its scientific advisers whether women could use the drug properly without professional advice. They could, the panel decided, voting 23-4 to recommend over-the-counter sales.

The key, they cautioned, would be clearer wording on the package so that women understand:

_The drug must be used as soon as possible after unprotected sex. Although it's effective for 72 hours, and possibly a little longer, it works best in the first 24 hours.

_Like other hormonal contraceptives, it does not protect against sexually transmitted diseases.

_It is a backup contraceptive, and should not be used instead of routine birth control.

Cost could deter some women from using emergency contraception too regularly. Each one-time-use pack today costs $20 to $30, about as much as a month's worth of regular birth control pills. It's not clear if the over-the-counter price would change.

Manufacturer Barr Laboratories promised a massive consumer education campaign, including a 24-hour hot line for advice on using the drug.

To improve access, California, Washington, Alaska, Hawaii and New Mexico already allow women to buy the morning-after pill directly from certain pharmacists without a prescription.

The FDA should not require pharmacists to dispense Plan B, most advisers agreed.

----------------------------

They edited out the self-loathing woman who made the comment about women's sexual behaviour. So much for liberal media...
 
This is something, I'd NEVER be interested in. My BC pills have been working for me all these damn years. I ain't switching to naything. Condoms are the best way to go now-a-days anyway. Too much going around now. You'd better strap it up...cuz a baby is the least of your worries today. :rolleyes:
 
Originally posted by SU's Finest '93
This is something, I'd NEVER be interested in. My BC pills have been working for me all these damn years. I ain't switching to naything. Condoms are the best way to go now-a-days anyway. Too much going around now. You'd better strap it up...cuz a baby is the least of your worries today. :rolleyes:

you said it, we are going to far with sex and any birth control for that matter. what ever will be will be. we are concerned with everything that goes with sex except for the education part.
"we" feel that discussing sex in schools is too much, but we'll take that same child to get an abortion. show a child what the 3rd stage of syphllis looks like and they will think twice.
 
Originally posted by dSWACizJSU
you said it, we are going to far with sex and any birth control for that matter. what ever will be will be. we are concerned with everything that goes with sex except for the education part.
"we" feel that discussing sex in schools is too much, but we'll take that same child to get an abortion. show a child what the 3rd stage of syphllis looks like and they will think twice.

Teach them about all aspects of sex, not just abstinance. Those who choose NOT to abstain need to know the proper methods to protect from disease, to prevent pregnancy, and the consequences of their actions.

Until we as a society get our heads out of the sand, we're going to have problems.
 
I figured that. It's just that one of the main tactics of the "abstinance only" crowd (who are the same people who are anti choice facist scum) is to focus on showing negative outcomes of sexual intercourse (3rd stage syphillis) and say, "this is why you shouldn't have sex" instead of, "this is what can happen if you have unprotected sex." There is a difference in approaches. The scare method has been tried for decades, and it has failed for decades. We need to go to educating young people and giving them the tools that they need should they make that decision.
 
That's telling them

Originally posted by sophandros
I figured that. It's just that one of the main tactics of the "abstinance only" crowd (who are the same people who are anti choice facist scum) is to focus on showing negative outcomes of sexual intercourse (3rd stage syphillis) and say, "this is why you shouldn't have sex" instead of, "this is what can happen if you have unprotected sex." There is a difference in approaches. The scare method has been tried for decades, and it has failed for decades. We need to go to educating young people and giving them the tools that they need should they make that decision.

Amen Bro
 
Back
Top