s phi s said:
Dayum J....You have your opinion, and I have mine. 94's trumpets impressed me more than 97's. If you ask me, 94 was a MUCH tighter band than 97, but there were several aspects where 97 was better than 94.
I'm not gonna let this turn into another SU debate. I was strictly making a point.
WTF!!?!?!!? Lil Boy you always acting like a DIC is stuck in your ARSE!!!
I agree 94 was a tighter band than 97.....
All I said was the contrast is why you noticed the trumpets more in 94!!!!!
WTF is wrong with you dude, you ain't talking to no 304 no!!!!!
Yo arse be "out the dorr wit it" sometimes!!!! Calm your fugging arse down boy...
I ain't LOUDER was better!!!!! He11 YEAH 94 band was much tighter than 97 IMO, and I marched in 97 band....
97 was MUCH MUCH more powerful than 94... 97 may have been the LOUDEST band in the 90's by far because of LOWER BRASS.. where as 94 was the WEAKEST of the 90's.... I stood in front both..... and juke from 94 that crabbed will tell you that...
It don't mean we were better cause we were SERIOUSLY louder...fugg!!!
if you call a typical SU trumpet section of with less than average numbers for a SU trumpet section...
SU average size trumpet section is (38)... 94 was probably the smallest trumpet section ever with (24)...
All I am saying is...
PAY THE FUGG ATTENTION!!!!! FOR YOU TO CALL THAT A MONSTER SECTION, IT HAD TO BE BECAUSE THAT WAS YOUR FIRST TIME HEARING SU.. WHICH IT WAS, CAUSE YOU SAID IT... AND THOSE 24 TRUMPETS DID STICK OUT IN THAT BAND IN 94.... ONLY BECAUSE THE BAND WASN'T the TYPICAL POWERFUL SU BAND!!!!
FUG *****, I AM SORRY YOUR FIRST SU EXPERIENCE WASN'T NEAR THE BEST IT COULD HAVE BEEN.
YOU GOT THAT SHAT BAD NIGQA.. YOU CALL YOURSELF TALKING TO ME LIKE I MARCHED UNDER YOUR ARSE....
YOU RIGHT YOU HAVE YOUR OWN OPINION...
I JUST GAVE YOUR ARSE SOME FUGGING EDUCATION....
YOU WAS STILL IN MIDDLE SCHOOL in 94... *****!!
I'm JUST GIVEN YOUR ARSE SOME EDUCATION FOOL!!!!