SWAC Releases 2013 Football Television Schedule


Status
Not open for further replies.
number1 said:
If you call a 4-pt. game getting whooped I guess so. NCCU went 15-1 in the MEAC and Norfolk went 16-0 in the MEAC, and guess what, neither team won the conference tournament.That should show you just because TXSU finished in 1st by 1 game, that wouldn't necessarily guarantee they would have made the SWAC Finals.
Click to expand...

What?
 
Pretty simple to understand. Several JSU posters keep trying to say that TXSU would have won the SWAC tournament had they been eligible for post-season participation. I just posted the situation in the MEAC where their 2 best teams who dominated the conference failed to win their tournament. Meaning there was no guarantee that TXSU would have even made the finals, let alone win it.
 



I thought most of the premiere games would be shown on the SWAC website. I hope they improved the quality of the streaming.
 
Last edited:
JROCK said:
2012-13 SWAC STANDINGS


Texas Southern 16-2 -- 17-14
Southern University 15-3 1 23-10
Arkansas-Pine Bluff 15-3 1 16-14
Jackson State 9-9 7 11-18 :lol: :emlaugh:
Prairie View A&M 8-10 8 15-19
Alabama State 8-10 8 10-22
Alcorn State 8-10 8 10-24
Alabama A&M 6-12 10 11-20
Mississippi Valley State 5-13 11 5-23
Grambling State 0-18 16 0-28

http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/team/_/id/2296/jackson-state-tigers
Click to expand...

I don't know what basketball has to do with a football schedule, but since you posted that nonsense, I'll post this.:lol:

SWAC Commish Cup standings for the men:

C.D. Henry Award - Men

Prairie View A&M 72.0
Jackson State 66.5
Alabama State 62.5
Texas Southern 57.0
Arkansas-Pine Bluff 50.5
Mississippi Valley State 44.5
Alcorn State 42.5
Alabama A&M 38.0
Southern 37.0
Grambling State 36.5

According to the stats, su was .5 of a point from coming in DEAD LAST on the men's side. That's DEAD last.:lol:
 
number1 said:
Pretty simple to understand. Several JSU posters keep trying to say that TXSU would have won the SWAC tournament had they been eligible for post-season participation. I just posted the situation in the MEAC where their 2 best teams who dominated the conference failed to win their tournament. Meaning there was no guarantee that TXSU would have even made the finals, let alone win it.
Click to expand...

What NC Central and Norfolk State did has nothing to do with what Texas Southern would've done, meaning there was no guarantee that su would've won the SWAC tournament if Texas Southern had participated.
That tournament champion has to have an * next to it because the two top teams didn't participate. su may have won had Texas Southern and PB participated then again perhaps they wouldn't have. Nobody knows, but one can always hypothesize.
 
SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY FINISHED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE BARREL IN ONE OF THE WORST CONFERENCE IN THE UNITED STATES....AGAIN WHY DO THEY THINK ANYONE IS JEALOUS OF THEM?
 
GoodFella said:
SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY FINISHED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE BARREL IN ONE OF THE WORST CONFERENCE IN THE UNITED STATES....AGAIN WHY DO THEY THINK ANYONE IS JEALOUS OF THEM?
Click to expand...

That's not the normal. We are back. Watch what happens in the future. Broussard has almost cleaned up the mess Greg Lafleur created.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top