Panther88
Banned
It's that time. I'm bored. lol I'll be burnt out discussing and cussing lol by mid-Aug.
The top returnee based on #s and performance? BLee of SU. What was it... 23 TDs and only 4ints? Right? He's a jr this fall(?) and seems like he's very established at orchestrating SU's offense. His #s are just..... damn man. :smh: Like pure gold. He's solid! :tup:
However lol, I like what I saw in Prairie View's <b>Mark Spivey</b> during the closing of last season (last 6 games). :read: He's tall (6' 6") and has a damned good gun of an arm from what I've seen. Seems to command the offense as required and makes some damned good reads/throws from what OTHERS (PV WRs :read: ) inform. :read: He's also evolved to be a "game-changer" of sorts. I'm sure the SUers and GSUers know what I'm talking about if you witnessed the games in which he entered. How 'effortlessly' he'd engineer a drive and have us in a position to score. :read:
GSU's Landers would get very strong consideration if not for the what.... 18ints vs 23 TDs? Gram could've easily been SWAC champs if not for the turnover by air because the other pieces were strongly in place. (read: made too many mistakes - hint! hint! BC :read: )
The top returnee based on #s and performance? BLee of SU. What was it... 23 TDs and only 4ints? Right? He's a jr this fall(?) and seems like he's very established at orchestrating SU's offense. His #s are just..... damn man. :smh: Like pure gold. He's solid! :tup:
However lol, I like what I saw in Prairie View's <b>Mark Spivey</b> during the closing of last season (last 6 games). :read: He's tall (6' 6") and has a damned good gun of an arm from what I've seen. Seems to command the offense as required and makes some damned good reads/throws from what OTHERS (PV WRs :read: ) inform. :read: He's also evolved to be a "game-changer" of sorts. I'm sure the SUers and GSUers know what I'm talking about if you witnessed the games in which he entered. How 'effortlessly' he'd engineer a drive and have us in a position to score. :read:
GSU's Landers would get very strong consideration if not for the what.... 18ints vs 23 TDs? Gram could've easily been SWAC champs if not for the turnover by air because the other pieces were strongly in place. (read: made too many mistakes - hint! hint! BC :read: )