Southern vs. South Dakota State on 9/25/04?


Status
Not open for further replies.
Ralph said:
Massey Ratings 2003 (699 NCAA squads):
148. Southern Univ
150. S Dakota St
Ralph save that crap you know darn well nobodys respect Massey like the do sagarin. Anyway welcome 89 and just ignore these fools their problem is they all have one thing in common, SUs foot up their @ss.
 



GSUperTiger said:
Since Gram entered the SWAC in 1958:

20 championships

SU=9=:(
Icon Gram=2to1over SU

Carry on.


Living in the past... :smh:

Diversion...

:-(
 
Just in case you were wondering what the offical Jackrabbit looks like here he is!


89rabbit.jpg
 
Jaguar94 said:
The sad part about this is we can't set a schedule with our own conference foes but now have room for a team from S. Dakota??????

How many fans does anyone think will travel to S. Dakota????

I know some may not agree, but I would prefer playing a reputable D2 school w/out a return trip vs. playing S. Dakota.

We are not going to the playoffs, are conf. ranking will be low regardless, so why not schedule Albany St. or FVSU?

BUT WE NEED TO FIX OUR CONFERENCE SCHEDULE 1ST!!!!!!!!!! That includes finalizing the mess WE help create with other conference schools.

Exactly....
 
bluedog said:
Ralph save that crap you know darn well nobodys respect Massey like the do sagarin. Anyway welcome 89 and just ignore these fools their problem is they all have one thing in common, SUs foot up their @ss.
In case you SDSU fans haven't noticed, bluedog smacks here as well as everywhere else. :retard:

bluedog, you should study the work of Dr. Kenneth Massey. He has developed comprehensive rankings that are used in the BCS and GPI. The difference between his and Jeff Sagarin's rankings are Sagarin only does D-I, Massey does all NCAA football.
 
Ralph said:
In case you SDSU fans haven't noticed, bluedog smacks here as well as everywhere else. :retard:

bluedog, you should study the work of Dr. Kenneth Massey. He has developed comprehensive rankings that are used in the BCS and GPI. The difference between his and Jeff Sagarin's rankings are Sagarin only does D-I, Massey does all NCAA football.


<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=635 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD width=635><TABLE height=45 cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=635 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top width="100%"><TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD class=datestamp height=20>Updated: 6/17/2004 10:52:28 PM<!--END TIME--></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD><TD vAlign=center align=right><A href="http://ad.usatoday.com/RealMedia/ads/click_lx.cgi/www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbt03.htm/30060/Zaplet1/16537SportsZaplet/clear.gif/34343062656530353430643235396630" target=_top><ADV SRC="http://images.usatoday.com/RealMedia/ads/OpenAd/Creatives/16537SportsZaplet/clear.gif" ALT="" BORDER="0"></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></TD></TR><TR><TD id=cnt_secondhnav vAlign=top>Jeff Sagarin <!-- #BeginEditable "Label" -->NCAA football<!-- #EndEditable--> ratings

? Sagarin ratings index

</TD></TR><!--endclickprintexclude--><TR><TD><!-- columnist, auxhtmlcontent1, sandbox lede --><!-- #BeginEditable "Sandbox" --><!-- Begin Automated Data -->

<!start_tag></PRE></FONT>

All Contents Copyright ? 2004 Jeff Sagarin<SUP>tm</SUP>. All rights reserved.COLLEGE FOOTBALL 2003 Ratings thru results of SUNDAY, JANUARY 4, 2004 - FINALRATING and PREDICTOR are unbiased and so is ELO-CHESS.this output has one part: (1) teams listed by RATING top-to-bottomThe SCHEDULE ratings represent the average schedule difficulty facedby each team in the games that it's played so far. The scheduledifficulty of a given game takes into account the rating of theopponent and the location of the game.In COLLEGE FOOTBALL the W-L records include ALL games, but ONLYgames between the 240 TEAMS RATED here are used for RATING and SCHEDULESTRENGTH computations.To make predictions for upcoming games, simply compare the RATINGS ofthe teams in question and allow an ADDITIONAL 3 points for the hometeam. Thus, for example, a HOME team with a rating of 92 would befavored by 5 points over a VISITING team having a rating of 90.Or a VISITING team with a rating of 89 would be favored by 7 pointsover a HOME team having a rating of 79.NOTE: Use whatever home advantage is listed in the output below. In the example just above, a home edge of 3 was shown for illustrative purposes. The home edge will vary during the season.The numbers to the right of a team's schedule strength are its rank ofschedule - (in parentheses) - and its record versus teams in theserating's CURRENT top 10 and CURRENT top 30 respectively.For the first few weeks of the season, the starting ratings have weightin the process(BAYESIAN), but once the teams are all CONNECTED, thenthe starting ratings are no longer used and all teams are started equaland the ELO-CHESS is then done in an UNBIASED manner from that point on.RATING and PREDICTOR are unbiased and so is ELO-CHESS.In RATING, all games count equally. This overall RATING is always on the left.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------In ELO-CHESS, only winning and losing matters; the score margin is of no consequence,which makes it very "politically correct". However it is less accurate in its predictions forupcoming games than is the PURE POINTS, in which the score margin is the only thing that matters.PURE POINTS is also known as PREDICTOR, BALLANTINE, RHEINGOLD, WHITE OWL and is the best single PREDICTORof future games. The ELO-CHESS will be utilized by the Bowl Championship Series(BCS).----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The overall RATING is a synthesis of the two diametrical opposites, ELO-CHESS and PURE POINTS (PREDICTOR).<HR></PRE></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE></P>
College Football 2003 thru Sunday, January 4, 2004 - FINAL the BCS uses the ELO-CHESS from here
HOME ADVANTAGE= 3.45 RATING W L SCHEDL(RANK) VS top 10 | VS top 30 | ELO-CHESS | PREDICTOR

151 Rhode Island AA = 50.00 4 8 56.10( 131) 0 0 | 0 0 | 46.13 160 | 53.27 141
152 Youngstown St. AA = 49.54 5 7 56.69( 128) 0 0 | 0 0 | 48.42 149 | 50.16 152
153 Southern U. AA = 49.33 12 1 31.42( 217) 0 0 | 0 0 | 52.92 128 | 44.94 171
154 Portland St. AA = 49.27 4 7 58.51( 121) 0 0 | 0 0 | 48.74 147 | 49.30 158
155 Buffalo A = 49.11 1 11 69.82( 67) 0 2 | 0 2 | 47.46 152 | 50.26 150
156 Southern Utah AA = 48.38 4 7 54.51( 141) 0 0 | 0 0 | 46.25 159 | 49.99 154
157 Samford AA = 48.08 7 4 44.34( 184) 0 0 | 0 0 | 46.29 158 | 49.36 157
158 UC Davis AAA = 47.61 6 4 46.87( 169) 0 0 | 0 0 | 43.36 169 | 51.16 147
159 Citadel AA = 47.53 6 6 50.08( 153) 0 1 | 0 1 | 49.34 144 | 45.09 170
160 UTEP A = 46.86 2 11 62.74( 111) 0 0 | 0 1 | 45.25 164 | 47.97 163

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbt03.htm

Kinda like the major networks don't broadcast any D-IAA games huh? :retard: :retard: :retard:
 
Ralph said:
Massey Ratings 2003 (699 NCAA squads):
148. Southern Univ
150. S Dakota St
Maybe you can explain to everybody how they can be rank 150 among D-IAA schools when this will be the first year they particpate as a D-IAA team. :retard:
 



bluedog said:
...Sagarin...
Kinda like the major networks don't broadcast any D-IAA games huh?
:retard: :retard: :retard: That's right. Sagarin only ranks D-I and the major networks don't televise I-AA except for the BC. :sleeping: Go away and quit trying to smack on the sports board.

ralph said:
Massey Ratings 2003 (699 NCAA squads):
148. Southern Univ
150. S Dakota St
bluedog said:
Maybe you can explain to everybody how they can be rank 150 among D-IAA schools when this will be the first year they particpate as a D-IAA team.
Learn Massey:
http://www.masseyratings.com/rate/cf-m.htm

Reading is a skill.
 
Dem dudes just might come down to SU and bang the Jaguars. You all should be glad that there is an unfamiliar opponent on the schedule. Makes the season interesting. Who cares about the quality of their band, its the score at the end of the game that counts. They may have a few more brothers on the team than you think. Schools in that part of the country attract players from mid-western cities (especially in basketball). The same players that we can't recruit to get on I-57 to attend our schools.

Welcome to the SWAC Football for the next two years JackRabbits and good luck.
 
I agree. I am glad to see different teams. I wonder how many of thier fans will travel to Baton Rouge. That is a long road trip.
 
Many of you have been saying 05 for the trip to SDSU. I've heard it was for 2006.

If y'all are correct and the mandate is in effect for 2005, SU will have no home non-conference games.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top