She's In!


Prof K said:
Explain, please.
Click to expand...

Looking at past history, successful tickets usually involve a combination of experienced insider and fresh-faced outsider. Every ticket must have that one candidate(usually VP) that's experienced enough in Washington and world matters to calm the American Public. Neither Clinton or Obama can fill that role. Obama is seen as the fresh new face, Clinton is well Clinton. She's been around forever, but still seen as that experienced insider.
 



Fa sho.. It seems as if these presidential elections are getting more and more popular. This upcoming one will be "the one" of all time. I say around July and August of this year, all hell gone be breakin loose.

Hillary Rodham Clinton for President!!!
 
I will be voting for Hillary in the primaries. I said this long ago when she first elected Senator of New York back in 2000. I saw president on her way back then.
 
I'm leaning towards Hillary but Obama/Edwards is a close second and alot can change my mind. I also predicted back in 2000 that Hillary would run and win the 08 Elections. IMO she's the most electable despite what the media tells you. Again, Clinton/Obama is my choice at the moment.
 
Dr. Sweet NUPE said:
Excellent!!!!

I truly believe Obama should take a backseat and lobby if she wins the Democratic nominations to be her Vice Presidential running mate.
Click to expand...
I kind of agree. Of the two, the one who loses the nomination should be the vp. I just think that in two years Obama will be the front runner and get the nomination. Obama/Clinton ticket.
Hillary will not do it because it would then look bad if she ran againist him in 2012 (no 2016). By then she feels she will be too old to get the nomination. She will not og on the ticket as a vp
 
Identity Dilemma...............Balancing act ............Appeal to black Voters.

'Who does he represent?'
Already, that balancing act is causing some strains. Some of Obama's longtime black supporters in Illinois are grumbling about the largely white crowd of advisers who now surround Obama as he gears up his national campaign. "Who does he represent? That is what people are worried about," said Lorenzo Martin, publisher of the Chicago Standard newspapers, a chain of black-oriented weeklies that circulate in the southern suburbs. "When you look and see who is surrounding him, you are not going to see too many brothers. What you see is the liberal left
 
staggalee83 said:
Identity Dilemma...............Balancing act ............Appeal to black Voters.

'Who does he represent?'
Already, that balancing act is causing some strains. Some of Obama's longtime black supporters in Illinois are grumbling about the largely white crowd of advisers who now surround Obama as he gears up his national campaign. "Who does he represent? That is what people are worried about," said Lorenzo Martin, publisher of the Chicago Standard newspapers, a chain of black-oriented weeklies that circulate in the southern suburbs. "When you look and see who is surrounding him, you are not going to see too many brothers. What you see is the liberal left
Click to expand...

:idea: The Liberal Left?

That's getting real old. Last time I checked the Liberal Left was right about Iraq. The Liberal Left is on the right side of our civil liberties in which Bush continues to erode. The Liberal left is for raising the minimum wage which hasn't been done since Clinton.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top