PV-Grambling (and TxSo) and historically bad APR


th


This one time "When jsu got Banned"

th


This one time "When jsu got Banned"

You will do better with the officer guy....

But AGAIN, this is NOT about JSU. It's about when I said other schools had bad APR too when we got banned.. and that has been proven to be true.

So what you wanna go to now... 2010 or SCG/APR.

I see the lil GSU dudes have run off. Maybe they are out of denial.

Why is that chick from TxSo in here tho. Have they no shame?
 



You will do better with the officer guy....

But AGAIN, this is NOT about JSU. It's about when I said other schools had bad APR too when we got banned.. and that has been proven to be true.

So what you wanna go to now... 2010 or SCG/APR.

I see the lil GSU dudes have run off. Maybe they are out of denial.

Why is that chick from TxSo in here tho. Have they no shame?

Run off? I'm just finished with liars and backtrackers, a waste.
 
Im not crying about anything.

My point is black and white..

Im confused.

I have no idea what you are talking about.. ALL I know is that I started this thread to show you that when JSU was banned,

Im so slow that I said JSU never had low APR scores

But AGAIN, this is NOT about JSU.

Make up your mind.......

Quit.....

images


But...........

xth,qid=HN.607987216869951405,apid=15.1.pagespeed.ic.kxYDH0R0ka.jpg


This one time "When jsu got banned"
 
Run off? I'm just finished with liars and backtrackers, a waste.

Look dude.. I know you quit. No shame in that. Whether I lied, cheated or stole doesn't change the fact that your APR was probably the 2nd worst (behind TxSorry) in the conference back then.
 
Make up your mind.......

Quit.....

images


But...........

xth,qid=HN.607987216869951405,apid=15.1.pagespeed.ic.kxYDH0R0ka.jpg


This one time "When jsu got banned"

JSU is only used as a point of reference here. Don't get it twisted. This is about how PVs APR was worse than most teams in the conference historically. PERIOD. Nothing you post (unfunny jokes) can change that. :lmao:
 
Are you sure? Have the NCAA got back with y'all yet?

Again, the NCAA is not ever going to give the death penalty to any school again. Not happening. They have had many chances to do that with more than some APR stuff. Where there were all kinds of stuff going on. The NCAA gives a black school the death penalty for APR issues especially some that is from a past regime and they will have opened a pandora's box bigger than what Sterling is going through. SU folks would not take that quietly. Trust me on that one. Tony Clayton would finally get his national media time. LOL. The NCAA is on borrowed time.

Just sitting back waiting on the Power 5 conferences to do away with them clowns.
 



Look dude.. I know you quit. No shame in that. Whether I lied, cheated or stole doesn't change the fact that your APR was probably the 2nd worst (behind TxSorry) in the conference back then.

Say what you want, cry a river of tears, talk about TSU's apr that's all fine and good. The one fact we also know to be true too, is that many of you jsu folk are not to smart either, because you are still in MS.
 
Say what you want, cry a river of tears, talk about TSU's apr that's all fine and good. The one fact we also know to be true too, is that many of you jsu folk are not to smart either, because you are still in MS.

I was really only trying to educate the masses on historically bad APR is at Grambling and PV.. I put you all in ( ) because everyone knows you all have historically had bad APR (coupled with cheating).
 
I was really only trying to educate the masses on historically bad APR is at Grambling and PV.. I put you all in ( ) because everyone knows you all have historically had bad APR (coupled with cheating).

As mentioned before SippiTigerprideLogic, APR as only been around about 10 yrs or so and enforcement started only in the last 5 yrs or. So if you want to take that short period of time and call it a historical problem factually you would be right since Historically means "in accordance to events in the past" but it makes your point weak because you could use historically to reference anything that happened in the past. One could say you are a historically lame poster simply based on your last couple days of posts which would factually also be accurate.
 
Oh DAYUM!!!!!



As mentioned before SippiTigerprideLogic, APR as only been around about 10 yrs or so and enforcement started only in the last 5 yrs or. So if you want to take that short period of time and call it a historical problem factually you would be right since Historically means "in accordance to events in the past" but it makes your point weak because you could use historically to reference anything that happened in the past. One could say you are a historically lame poster simply based on your last couple days of posts which would factually also be accurate.
 
As mentioned before SippiTigerprideLogic, APR as only been around about 10 yrs or so and enforcement started only in the last 5 yrs or. So if you want to take that short period of time and call it a historical problem factually you would be right since Historically means "in accordance to events in the past" but it makes your point weak because you could use historically to reference anything that happened in the past. One could say you are a historically lame poster simply based on your last couple days of posts which would factually also be accurate.

th
 
I noticed how poster's whose school is consistently below APR requirements are co-signing against TP. If I might say so, that's quite telling.
 
I noticed how poster's whose school is consistently below APR requirements are co-signing against TP. If I might say so, that's quite telling.

I don't have much to say about much until you put TSU in your mouth and I'm going to be like you chewing gum in church.

YS1046.JPG
Let me get that out your mouth baby, just put it right her and don't let me catch you doing that no mo...
 
Back
Top