Panther88
Banned
*DING* *DING* *DING!!!!!*
Damn. 29 WHOLE points. lol :emlaugh: I'm not laughing @ Valley. I'm laughing @ the rest of you who are STUCK in 1991. :retard: Sh*t, it's 2008. We STINK (collectively).
MVSU vs UCLA game updates
- Thread starter ToPdOg
- Start date
- Status
*DING* *DING* *DING!!!!!*
Damn. 29 WHOLE points. lol :emlaugh: I'm not laughing @ Valley. I'm laughing @ the rest of you who are STUCK in 1991. :retard: Sh*t, it's 2008. We STINK (collectively).
JayRob
TigaPaw
Collectively?! Speak for your own team. In my mind this loss is on Valley and Valley alone.
SUjagTILLiDIE
Well-Known Member
Avery was the 12th man off the bench @ St.Aug. Avery was a women's gym legend @ SU, thats where Jobe found him.
PsychoJag
We Run The SWAC
Collectively the SWAC stinks. To thine own self be true.
Antroy
Well-Known Member
This is the first time that I actually WISHED we would have been put in the play-in game. :smh:
Devilsh1
The Preeminent One!
You a damn fool...JSU wouldn't have done a better job period...They Suck this year and you know it!!!! Well it's over now!! We lost and we can bring it on back to the Valley and prepare for next season lol!!!
the band fan
Baseball Fan
I hate to say it...but at least you get double exposure and extra money with a play-in win....
J-State2DaPoint
"Eye Of The Tiger"
I'm still trying to figure out why they only scored 29pts.... somebody need to help me understand. Regardless if valley is sorry or not, you're the swac champs and you couldnt score atleast 50pts? I must say that it was hard for me to watch that game. I just knew it was only going to get better (after I saw an exciting bama st game... and after i listened to a interesting game from the lady panthers of pv)
avrg 14.5 pts each half?
avrg 14.5 pts each half?
JayRob
TigaPaw
The hell JSU wouldn't have. I know we would've scored more than 30 points. I'm talking about 30 points. In case you didn't know it, but you guys set a dayum record for futility.....29 points.
Panthro was right for cryin out loud.:smh:
Oh, by the way, we'll save this loss for smack fodder at a later date. We know you're hurting right now.
major095
ASU4real
this loss is on valley. hold up! yall have forgotten huh. hop in my time machine and I'll set the date for nov 24, 2007. earlier this season valley actually scored 26 points in a 71-26 loss to washington state. that didn't happen to anyone else in the swac, but it happen to valley 2x and I'm not trying to count how many times they didn't break 48. but we'll see. southern's got a nice pt guard coming in and bama state is stock piling players like nukes in a silo. grambling new facility should help them recruit and if tsu can ever get it together with texas talent at their door step.
J-State2DaPoint
"Eye Of The Tiger"
that helps out a lot. thnx
JayRob
TigaPaw
Exactly!!
This si the first year that they started giving the extra money, before this year it was a 2 for 1 on the money.
Da_Sperm
New Member
You have to understand that the WORST kid on the UCLA bench is 10x better than the BEST KID in the SWAC, not just Valley. In fact, the WORST KID on the UCLA bench WORST OFFERS were better than 99% of the kid's BEST OFFERS in the SWAC.
Now, add better coaching, better nutrition, better workouts, better this, better that, and you would UNDERSTAND why Valley took a BEATDOWN.
Now, add better coaching, better nutrition, better workouts, better this, better that, and you would UNDERSTAND why Valley took a BEATDOWN.
Blacknbengal
Well-Known Member
Man, why you gots to go and bring this back up? And at a time like this. :smh:
Panther88
Banned
But Sperm, back in 1991 SU beat "mighty" georgia tech in the tourney. :lol: But Sperm, we used to get ALLLLLLLLLLL the talent there was back in 1986. But Sperm, we used to get ALLLLLLLLLLL the talent back in 1942. :lol:
We're getting drug UP and down the court and our OOC records vs Div I(plural for ALL of us) TESTIFIES to this and these damned people wanna' LIVE 1991 like it's 2008. :retard: Double-damned ditto for our football squads.
Wanna' know where the SWAC stands, compare our records vs EVERYTHING that is going on w/ neighboring FCSer southland conference. THEY OWN US IN EVERYTHING. BAR NONE. Argue that fact. :retard:
I'm not happy about this. But I'm even unhappier when I see nothing being done about it. :retard: A bunch of wasted scholarships. :lol: We are what we attract. :read: At LEAST be competitive, sh*t. :shame:
I remember the SU teams under Carl Stewart. He let (actually molded) the players' talents help his teams win. BTW in addition to quick players, Stewart had some great shooters too.
Why wait to shoot the ball at 25 seconds when one can shoot the ball at 10-12?
Then again a coach needs players to win.
In 1986 Valley led Duke, the tournament's overall number one seed, by three at the half. From what I heard Coach K turned Johnny Dawkins loose they Valley lost by seven. Despite losing the game, Valley got a lot of respect for how they played.
Even though SWAC schools would get whipped by the big schools during the '80s, they could still on occasion be competitive with a big school.
I am with you. At least be competitive.
JayRob
TigaPaw
Exactly, at least be competitive. Last year, JSU lost to Florida, but at least they played them almost equal until the second half where they were just worn down. Valley's players had that "deer-in-the-headlight" look the WHOLE game. No one seemed to want to step up.
29 points....?! Sheesh!!
JR
Well-Known Member
Uh P that was 1993. But in case your forgot TxSU was a free throw made from upsetting Arkansas and their number 1 arses in the tourney a few years later. Not to mention SU played Duke well just 2 years ago in the tourney. Even gave LSU the blueprint to eventually beat Duke a game later. So don't act the SWAC has not been competative in the tourney since 91 or so. No way any of our schools should get beat like that. Even Belmont played Duke to the very end. I am sure Belmont facilities, coaches, players and such are on Duke's level with their All-American HS team coach K is fielding over there. Not that Valley should have won............but they could have played better than that. Hell the number 1 HS team in the country could score 30 against UCLA. Aint like they are the Lakers, Celtics or Pistons or somebody. Damn......
Bama State would have not been beaten like that.
We got to have some pride. Just like Cookman and SU did against USC and UCLA in baseball. I am sure their facilities and such are much better than Cookman and SU's put together.
Panther88
Banned
Taylor-Made'90
I'm 'Citrix SSO' batch!!!
I dunno guys.... Last night's loss can be defined on many levels... And while Valley was the 'team' that loss, the loss isn't solely on them (like some of you seem to suggest)...
In fact, the way I saw it, there was no way Valley was going to even be competitve against UCLA. And few other SWAC teams wouldn't have done that much better.
The 'grand canyon' that exists in athletic funding, when you compare a UCLA to a Valley is hard to fathom. It's truly David versus Goliath. The facilities, the conditioning, the recruiting, the coaches, everything is beyond compare.
I'm proud of the fact the kids didn't quit. They just couldn't compete with a bigger, stronger, better conditioned team....
The athletic product we put on the court is DIRECTLY RELATED to the money we spend on that program.....
We get what we pay for.
The 'onus' is on US to improve our facilities, coaches and programs (in that order). Can't blame UCLA for being what they are....
They're BETTER.....
In fact, the way I saw it, there was no way Valley was going to even be competitve against UCLA. And few other SWAC teams wouldn't have done that much better.
The 'grand canyon' that exists in athletic funding, when you compare a UCLA to a Valley is hard to fathom. It's truly David versus Goliath. The facilities, the conditioning, the recruiting, the coaches, everything is beyond compare.
I'm proud of the fact the kids didn't quit. They just couldn't compete with a bigger, stronger, better conditioned team....
The athletic product we put on the court is DIRECTLY RELATED to the money we spend on that program.....
We get what we pay for.
The 'onus' is on US to improve our facilities, coaches and programs (in that order). Can't blame UCLA for being what they are....
They're BETTER.....
JR
Well-Known Member
Uh Belmont is the present. 2006 is only 2 years ago. JSU battled Florida last season. We can be competative in baseball PRESENTLY against the white boys who have more than we do but can't stay within 20 points of UCLA? Come on bruh. What makes us so different than a Belmont? You don't need facilities to be able to play basketball as much as you do in football. Valley's PG was the fastest kid on the floor last night. Practice and more practice. Better coaching is the key.......
JR
Well-Known Member
Exactly. It is called having pride. Belmont had that against Duke last night.
- Status