Look like the greatest touchdown dive in SWAC history wasn't 2yds away after all


Status
Not open for further replies.
My photos spoke for themselves in both cases and was used in both cases.

https://www.hbcusports.com/forums/threads/swac-suspends-football-officiating-crew.128438/

But it's just you and your crew that's been talking about it in this thread like you're trying to flip flop it when it's against your school....

https://www.hbcusports.com/forums/t...view-a-m-game-updates-2-00pm-ct.128385/page-5
My photos spoke for themselves in both cases and was used in both cases.

https://www.hbcusports.com/forums/threads/swac-suspends-football-officiating-crew.128438/

But it's just you and your crew that's been talking about it in this thread like you're trying to flip flop it when it's against your school....

https://www.hbcusports.com/forums/t...view-a-m-game-updates-2-00pm-ct.128385/page-5


Obviously you misunderstood what I asked or you're doing your usual attempt to misguide and deflect.

Show everybody those 6 pages of outrage you post about y'all getting that touchdown and all the e-mails you sent the swac to suspend the refs.

I'll wait
 
Last edited:
Does anyone know bluedog's point?

.... and JR, Pete didnt have any TO's. I guess he wanted the refs to stop the clock for him. lol
 



Ummm...I don't have a dog in this fight....but for what it's worth, you did create this thread implying that Fiyah's pic wasn't even a part of the play at all. It turns out that you were wrong.

YOU MAY WANT TO PUT ON YOUR READERS AND TRY READING THE TITLE AGAIN. I COULD BE WRONG BUT I DOUBT IT.

There are some educated men on this forum who concluded - even before the SWAC announced than "an erroneous call" had been made - that none of the pics show that the play resulted in a touchdown. To argue that the ball "MAY" have been in the player's hand when it broke the plain of the goal isn't scary as "phuck", IT WAS WRONG AS PHUCK.

Hmm care to explain how stating a possibility (MAY) could ever be wrong? The core of the statement in itself automatically acknowledge that it "MAY" also be right.


Instead of taking the uneducated route in calling people who oppose your argument "bozos", take the "educated" route and simply admit that while SU won the game, you lost the argument. You were wrong. It's OK. It happens to ALL of us from time to time. These six pages of outrage began with you expressing outrage. Remember that.

I'll wait.

Until then I'm going to have fun with these hypocritical bozos watching them spill all that whine with no cheese.
 
Last edited:
Looks like this is the 4th time that I know of where this happened in.

SU vs. Prairie View 2017
Alabama St. vs. Prairie View 2016
Alabama St. vs. Tuskegee
MVSU vs. Grambling 2006 (That blown call caused Valley not to go the SCG in 2006)
 
We got folks butt hurt in this thread........Raise your hand if you took that L from S.U. this year and/or last year. If you haven't taken your whoopin this year yet.....stand in line, single file! LOL
 
Hey the Ref is from Houston and a SIAC grad. So no connections to SU. Maybe folks need to look elsewhere. Leave us out of it. Also for you folks who can't count. The game still would be tied 31-31. The points in question was the TD and missed XP. So you remove those six points off the board. SU and PV scored each again after that play.
 



Hey the Ref is from Houston and a SIAC grad. So no connections to SU. Maybe folks need to look elsewhere. Leave us out of it. Also for you folks who can't count. The game still would be tied 31-31. The points in question was the TD and missed XP. So you remove those six points off the board. SU and PV scored each again after that play.
You know that doesn't fit the narrative in here. lol
 
Ummm...I don't have a dog in this fight....but for what it's worth, you did create this thread implying that Fiyah's pic wasn't even a part of the play at all. It turns out that you were wrong.


There are some educated men on this forum who concluded - even before the SWAC announced than "an erroneous call" had been made - that none of the pics show that the play resulted in a touchdown. To argue that the ball "MAY" have been in the player's hand when it broke the plain of the goal isn't scary as "phuck", IT WAS WRONG AS PHUCK.

Instead of taking the uneducated route in calling people who oppose your argument "bozos", take the "educated" route and simply admit that while SU won the game, you lost the argument. You were wrong. It's OK. It happens to ALL of us from time to time. These six pages of outrage began with you expressing outrage. Remember that.
Kenn, his recurring senselessness is exhausting.
 
Does anyone know bluedog's point?
lol

He don't know his point since he was the one that started this thread and going on with his ranting trying to claim I have this 6 page thread.

Also for you folks who can't count. The game still would be tied 31-31. The points in question was the TD and missed XP. So you remove those six points off the board. SU and PV scored each again after that play.

You know why they missed that xtra point?
They forgot there was no replay and was trying to rush the kick so it can't be reviewed. LOL
 
He don't know his point since he was the one that started this thread and going on with his ranting trying to claim I have this 6 page thread.



You know why they missed that xtra point?
They forgot there was no replay and was trying to rush the kick so it can't be reviewed. LOL


You just made it seven sore loser. ZomboMeme 05112017102614.jpg
 
He don't know his point since he was the one that started this thread and going on with his ranting trying to claim I have this 6 page thread.



You know why they missed that xtra point?
They forgot there was no replay and was trying to rush the kick so it can't be reviewed. LOL
The ball went out at the 1. I saw the replay on WAFB BR.
 
The ball went out at the 1. I saw the replay on WAFB BR.

No it didn't, it went out about a yard into the end zone.

23434705_1751458034884774_4532484428424490665_n.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top