Makijsity,
Maybe I should clarify my point regarding the kind of athlete that FAMU will get : they will get the same quality of athlete that they are getting now - but since they will have more scholarships to offers, they will just get more of the same.
If FAMU was truely raising hell at the 1-AA level and then decided to make the jump - the kind of athlete they would attract might be a bit different, but at the point in which they are entering D-1A, it is not really going to make a major difference. Once/IF they make the move and the prove themselves as competitive then im sure they will get better players. But if the attraction is to play at a HBCU that is the first one to jump to 1A in football - and that team is constantly losing whats the use? Troy State for instance - they are still getting the same athletes they were getting at the 1AA level - they just have more of them - but they are not winning. If they ever do start, then im sure they will compete for the "better" athlete.
If FAMU makes the move - and after the first 4 years or so they are constantly 3-8, 2-9, 4-7 - what is the draw for a player to attend FAMU - versus one attending a Gram, SU, Bama St , J-State, AMMU - HBCU's that during the same time frame might be posting winning records? My point being that the "HBCU" draw is not necesarily going to work - if FAMU is competing against HBCU that are winning at the time - even though they are 1-AA - for the same player - the fact that they are 1A is not goin to be present much of a difference. It is my contention that the student - if they base it on just football - will pick the school that is winning.
In my opinion, you have made a great deal many assumptions with several leaps in providing your opinion in regards to Florida A & M University move to Div-I A and their ability to recruit more and better caliber athletes
(not top tier) with little reference to proving statistical evidence.
Your reference to the example of Troy State University and suggestion that they are only recruiting more of the same athletes they recruited at the Div-IAA level without reference to how you came up with this assertion is difficult for those that are used to analyzing data before providing an opinion on a subject.
In my opinion, there are so many various reasons why student athletes chose to accept an athletic scholarship. In fact it is to many to reasonable assume that when Troy State University moved from Division II to Division I AA to Division I A that they have not changed the quality caliber of student athlete they recruited, but only the number of them.
This assumption, as stated above, does not take into account the various reasons student athletes chose to except an athletic scholarship.
i.e.
1) The ability to study for your future chosen profession (major)
2) A particular schools athletic graduation rate
3) The ability to start at a given position
4) Location of school
5) Winning tradition
6) Television exposure
7) Quality of coaching
8) Quality of facilities
9) Quality of competition
10) Quality of fan support
11) etc.
The list above is just a small portion of the number of reasons a student athlete will chose to except an athletic schoplarship. The information listed above was obtain by an interview of a student athlete that choose to except an athletic scholarship as well as seperate research paper on HBCU student athletes.