Hey MikeBigg look at what the Ncaa thinks about your schedule
- Thread starter bluedog
- Start date
Dr. Sweet NUPE
New Member
Jesus wept....
GRAM4LIFE
Well-Known Member
That's true, but they do play a part in your strength of schedule which is what this thread is about. Try to stay on topic...Originally posted by LaCumba
Allen and Lincoln plays no part in our return to Birmingham.
P.S. Here are a couple more errors in that report I would like to point out to you since you didn't pay too much attention. There is a 0-3 team, Valley, missing from your record in that link. Which would of course bring yours down, then add in Allen and Lincoln. Well... I'll just leave it at that.
As for ours... You can easily point out the flaws. San Jose State isn't listed. And after that, our other previous opponents (Alcorn and AAMU) are not 2-2. They are 2-4.
I guess since it was written down then you thought it was true. So, before you start trying to be smart. Pay attention...
bluedog
"Leader of Kings"
That's not true, it's base off of.......
Toughest Schedule
(Teams with at least 9 Inter-Division games)
Sorted on Cumulative Opposition
13-SEP-03 Data Valid Thru :
IAA Division
That clearly tells you they started from last year until this date and for that same reason they can't add allen and lincoln because we haven't played them yet.
As for your assertion that they didn't add valley in, what do you think the three wins they calculated in the equation does?
Excuse me I won't try to be smart anymore or better yet I won't become a lie detector anymore.
Toughest Schedule
(Teams with at least 9 Inter-Division games)
Sorted on Cumulative Opposition
13-SEP-03 Data Valid Thru :
IAA Division
That clearly tells you they started from last year until this date and for that same reason they can't add allen and lincoln because we haven't played them yet.
As for your assertion that they didn't add valley in, what do you think the three wins they calculated in the equation does?
Excuse me I won't try to be smart anymore or better yet I won't become a lie detector anymore.
GRAM4LIFE
Well-Known Member
Do you know what Cumulative Opposition means? Let me help you out since clearly you don't. It's the combination between past opposition and future opposition. That's also in the link in which you posted. See they added the two together and came up with cumulative opposition. Following me? Let's continue...
Valley 0-3
PV 1-2
AT&T 2-1
The three wins came from AT&T having two wins and PV having one. I know you can understand that. Like I said, Valley wasn't included. If you would like for me to break down the whole table for you, I will.
Notice that is under the past competition column. Here's yours:
Valley 0-3
PV 1-2
AT&T 2-1
The three wins came from AT&T having two wins and PV having one. I know you can understand that. Like I said, Valley wasn't included. If you would like for me to break down the whole table for you, I will.
GRAM4LIFE
Well-Known Member
So, how did Grambling's get counted?
SJSU 1-2
Alcorn 1-2
AAMU 1-2
Using what you said would mean that ours should be 2-4 not 2-2, right? Unless they only counted Alcorn at 1-2 and AAMU at 1-2... Giving us 2-2.
The only thing that I could gather from this is that they don't include teams from other divisions i.e. Allen; Lincoln; San Jose State. Which wouldn't take all teams played into account... So this way of judging schedule strength is flawed.
bluedog
"Leader of Kings"
Originally posted by GRAM4LIFE
Do you know what Cumulative Opposition means? Let me help you out since clearly you don't. It's the combination between past opposition and future opposition. That's also in the link in which you posted. See they added the two together and came up with cumulative opposition. Following me? Let's continue...
Notice that is under the past competition column. Here's yours:
Valley 0-3
PV 1-2
AT&T 2-1
The three wins came from AT&T having two wins and PV having one. I know you can understand that. Like I said, Valley wasn't included. If you would like for me to break down the whole table for you, I will.
Dude,Dude,Dude, try to spin it anyway you want to.....your ten spots behind us "period"
Next you'll be saying there's a flaw in the turf and that's why gram player's can't catch up with our's. :lmao:
Stormy
extradinaire d'auteur
Originally posted by bluedog
Dude,Dude,Dude, try to spin it anyway you want to.....your ten spots behind us "period"
Next you'll be saying there's a flaw in the turf and that's why gram player's can't catch up with our's. :lmao:
bluedog,
Any excuse will do....why won't they just admit their most prized tradition?
Which is getting that ass whipped by Southern annually.
-Astrya
MACHIAVELLI
Chairman/C.E.O.
I wonder what they think about this...
Sports Network's/CSTV I-AA College Football Poll
Team (First-place votes) 2003 Record Points Previous Rank
1. McNeese State Cowboys (76) 3-1 2,547 1
2. Western Illinois Leathernecks (13) 3-1 2,430 2
3. Western Kentucky Hilltoppers (12) 3-0 2,399 3
4. Northeastern Huskies (1) 4-0 2,232 4
5. Villanova Wildcats (2) 3-0 2,165 5
6. Bethune-Cookman Wildcats 3-0 1,948 7
7. Delaware Blue Hens 3-0 1,944 8
8. Furman Paladins 2-1 1,879 9
9. Montana Grizzlies 2-1 1,653 10
10. Massachusetts Minutemen 2-1 1,554 12
11. Northwestern State Demons 3-1 1,394 15
12. Idaho State Bengals 2-1 1,229 14
13. Southern Illinois Salukis 3-0 1,144 17
14. Cal Poly Mustangs 3-0 1,077 21
15. Wofford Terriers 2-1 1,059 25
16. Georgia Southern Eagles 1-2 977 6
17. Fordham Rams 3-1 870 18
18. Grambling State Tigers 2-2 843 13
19. Lehigh Mountain Hawks 3-0 788 20
20. Montana State Bobcats 1-2 500 11
21. Penn Quakers 1-0 489 23
22. Colgate Raiders 3-0 470 24
23. Illinois State Redbirds 3-1 403 NR
24. Maine Black Bears 2-2 347 16
25. Northern Arizona Lumberjacks 2-1 294 NR
Others receiving votes: Eastern Washington, Northern Iowa, Southern, Eastern Illinois, Gardner-Webb, Alabama State, Portland State, James Madison, Hampton, Eastern Kentucky, Appalachian State, Weber State, Southwest Missouri State, Yale, Harvard, Stephen F. Austin, Youngstown State, Nicholls State, Northern Colorado.
***************************************************
Sports Network's/CSTV I-AA College Football Poll
Team (First-place votes) 2003 Record Points Previous Rank
1. McNeese State Cowboys (76) 3-1 2,547 1
2. Western Illinois Leathernecks (13) 3-1 2,430 2
3. Western Kentucky Hilltoppers (12) 3-0 2,399 3
4. Northeastern Huskies (1) 4-0 2,232 4
5. Villanova Wildcats (2) 3-0 2,165 5
6. Bethune-Cookman Wildcats 3-0 1,948 7
7. Delaware Blue Hens 3-0 1,944 8
8. Furman Paladins 2-1 1,879 9
9. Montana Grizzlies 2-1 1,653 10
10. Massachusetts Minutemen 2-1 1,554 12
11. Northwestern State Demons 3-1 1,394 15
12. Idaho State Bengals 2-1 1,229 14
13. Southern Illinois Salukis 3-0 1,144 17
14. Cal Poly Mustangs 3-0 1,077 21
15. Wofford Terriers 2-1 1,059 25
16. Georgia Southern Eagles 1-2 977 6
17. Fordham Rams 3-1 870 18
18. Grambling State Tigers 2-2 843 13
19. Lehigh Mountain Hawks 3-0 788 20
20. Montana State Bobcats 1-2 500 11
21. Penn Quakers 1-0 489 23
22. Colgate Raiders 3-0 470 24
23. Illinois State Redbirds 3-1 403 NR
24. Maine Black Bears 2-2 347 16
25. Northern Arizona Lumberjacks 2-1 294 NR
Others receiving votes: Eastern Washington, Northern Iowa, Southern, Eastern Illinois, Gardner-Webb, Alabama State, Portland State, James Madison, Hampton, Eastern Kentucky, Appalachian State, Weber State, Southwest Missouri State, Yale, Harvard, Stephen F. Austin, Youngstown State, Nicholls State, Northern Colorado.
***************************************************
MACHIAVELLI
Chairman/C.E.O.
Spin doctors