++Get Ready and the rest of the Wafia...ZERO yards rushing?????++


Jax said:
R0b, y0u d0 realize an effective ground/running game sh0uld at least c0unter what y0u p0sted ab0ve.

0h well... :shame:
Click to expand...
Never said we had an "effective ground/running game". Our OC ain't trying to do that. But when we do use our RBs, we do pretty decent.

BTW, you forgot to put a "0" in "ground" up yonder.
 
:what:, You mean to tell me that The Mighty JSU had, NO,ZERO, ZIPP, Nada, Tinny Tanny yard rushing!!!!!!!!! Yes Wafia get yo arses in here and explain this BS, and you call yourself a college team:lol:, even lowly TSU as you like to refer to us was able to get 54 again ULM, JSU YA"LL SUCK. What a waste of money!
 



DallasCowboyGirl said:
:what:, You mean to tell me that The Mighty JSU had, NO,ZERO, ZIPP, Nada, Tinny Tanny yard rushing!!!!!!!!! Yes Wafia get yo arses in here and explain this BS, and you call yourself a college team:lol:, even lowly TSU as you like to refer to us was able to get 54 again ULM, JSU YA"LL SUCK. What a waste of money!
Click to expand...

"A waste of money"...:D
 
JagHammer said:
"Yes! Yes! Sacks and miscues I love! I love subtraction! I see Gram took all your rushing yards!"

sesame_street_count_dracula.jpg
Click to expand...

:lol:
 
ok...I got Rob's take on the ground game. :tup:
I'm waiting to see how GR and co. (TP, JayRob and NT) is gonna spin this.

Stop lurking and get to explaining. :lol:
 
Robber said:
Thank God for stupid QB sacks for major losses of yards. They didn't shut down our RBs. Balls snapped over QBs heads and such will reduce rush yardage easily. That stat had nothing to do with the running game. When we tried to run, we ran.
Click to expand...
s

Okay J0U had 39 running plays that equaled 0 yards and 4 bad play that equaled 0 yards. 0 from 0 is still 0. 39+4 is 43 which still equals 0 net yardage. 0000000:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
CATMENDUE2 said:
s

Okay J0U had 39 running plays that equaled 0 yards and 4 bad play that equaled 0 yards. 0 from 0 is still 0. 39+4 is 43 which still equals 0 net yardage. 0000000:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
Click to expand...
WTF is you talking about??? Be thankful for the gifts we gave y'all. 9 first downs. Sure looked good for y'all when Warren ran that TD at the end of the game. Sure padded his and y'all stats. That was 25% of all y'all yards and half of his 108. Darkside put that clamps on y'all.

Be thankful.
 
Panther88 said:
Man i'm in TEARSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!@!!!!!!!!!!

":lmao: :emlaugh: :bawling:
Click to expand...
I ain't gone lie, y'all got me rolling this a.m. This "0" thingy is fun-e to me.

Now, I can grab breakfast and go to the sports bar in good spirits. Got an all day affair today, as my Cowboys close the show tonight. Time to christen MECCA!!!!

How 'bout dem Cowboys!!!
 
Robber said:
WTF is you talking about??? Be thankful for the gifts we gave y'all. 9 first downs. Sure looked good for y'all when Warren ran that TD at the end of the game. Sure padded his and y'all stats. That was 25% of all y'all yards and half of his 108. Darkside put that clamps on y'all.

Be thankful.
Click to expand...
GSU 27 Jstank0 17
 



Robber said:
Thank God for stupid QB sacks for major losses of yards. They didn't shut down our RBs. Balls snapped over QBs heads and such will reduce rush yardage easily. That stat had nothing to do with the running game. When we tried to run, we ran.
Click to expand...

Then yall azzes must have been running in place.
 
Jax said:
R0b, y0u d0 realize an effective ground/running game sh0uld at least c0unter what y0u p0sted ab0ve.

0h well... :shame:
Click to expand...

Bruh, your team would have had the same amount of rushing yards last night if you lost 70 yards on punts over someone's head, etc.... Our RBs didn't lose any yards.
 
Tigerpride said:
Bruh, your team would have had the same amount of rushing yards last night if you lost 70 yards on punts over someone's head, etc.... Our RBs didn't lose any yards.
Click to expand...

Well if you coach had the good sense(Thanks Robber). He would have had an eligible long snapper on the team. At least Pete realizes you have to recruit some kids that did that in HS and get them some practice time. But that's what yall are paying Comegy 186K for. Oh well.
 
JR said:
Well if you coach had the good sense(Thanks Robber). He would have had an eligible long snapper on the team. At least Pete realizes you have to recruit some kids that did that in HS and get them some practice time. But that's what yall are paying Comegy 186K for. Oh well.
Click to expand...

You might be right but STILL, this zero yards rushing has NOTHING to do with Gramblings defense. That's MY point. YOu can rag on my special teams all you want but you ain't about to give Grambling's defense credit for something they didn't do.
 
Tigerpride said:
Bruh, your team would have had the same amount of rushing yards last night if you lost 70 yards on punts over someone's head, etc.... Our RBs didn't lose any yards.
Click to expand...

0nce again, if y0u had an effective gr0und game, n0 explinati0n needed.

0h well...lma0
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top