Feeding Tube Debate


I want to know who has been footing the bill for her healthcare, since money awarded from the lawsuit has probably been exhausted for a few years. If she had insurance, it probably had a cap of $1 MM, which may have covered a year's worth of services.
 



cat daddy said:
Yes I expect they will file a wrongful death lawsuit. It's just a matter of time.
They have no standing to bring a wrongful death lawsuit. She is a married woman which means her husband is her next of kin, not her parents.
 
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationw...7mar27,0,5710023.story?coll=la-home-headlines

THE TERRI SCHIAVO CASE
DeLay's Own Tragic Crossroads
Family of the lawmaker involved in the Schiavo case decided in '88 to let his comatose father die.
By Walter F. Roche Jr. and Sam Howe Verhovek
Times Staff Writers

March 27, 2005

CANYON LAKE, Texas ? A family tragedy that unfolded in a Texas hospital during the fall of 1988 was a private ordeal ? without judges, emergency sessions of Congress or the debate raging outside Terri Schiavo's Florida hospice.

The patient then was a 65-year-old drilling contractor, badly injured in a freak accident at his home. Among the family members keeping vigil at Brooke Army Medical Center was a grieving junior congressman ? Rep. Tom DeLay (R-Texas).

More than 16 years ago, far from the political passions that have defined the Schiavo controversy, the DeLay family endured its own wrenching end-of-life crisis. The man in a coma, kept alive by intravenous lines and oxygen equipment, was DeLay's father, Charles Ray DeLay.

Then, freshly reelected to a third term in the House, the 41-year-old DeLay waited, all but helpless, for the verdict of doctors.

Today, as House Majority Leader, DeLay has teamed with his Senate counterpart, Bill Frist (R-Tenn.), to champion political intervention in the Schiavo case. They pushed emergency legislation through Congress to shift the legal case from Florida state courts to the federal judiciary.

And DeLay is among the strongest advocates of keeping the woman, who doctors say has been in a persistent vegetative state for 15 years, connected to her feeding tube. DeLay has denounced Schiavo's husband, as well as judges, for committing what he calls "an act of barbarism" in removing the tube.

In 1988, however, there was no such fiery rhetoric as the congressman quietly joined the sad family consensus to let his father die.

"There was no point to even really talking about it," Maxine DeLay, the congressman's 81-year-old widowed mother, recalled in an interview last week. "There was no way [Charles] wanted to live like that. Tom knew ? we all knew ? his father wouldn't have wanted to live that way."

Doctors advised that he would "basically be a vegetable," said the congressman's aunt, JoAnne DeLay.

When his father's kidneys failed, the DeLay family decided against connecting him to a dialysis machine. "Extraordinary measures to prolong life were not initiated," said his medical report, citing "agreement with the family's wishes." His bedside chart carried the instruction: "Do not resuscitate."

On Dec. 14, 1988, the DeLay patriarch "expired with his family in attendance."

"The situation faced by the congressman's family was entirely different than Terri Schiavo's," said a spokesman for the majority leader, who declined requests for an interview.

"The only thing keeping her alive is the food and water we all need to survive. His father was on a ventilator and other machines to sustain him," said Dan Allen, DeLay's press aide.

There were also these similarities: Both stricken patients were severely brain-damaged. Both were incapable of surviving without medical assistance. Both were said to have expressed a desire to be spared from being kept alive by artificial means. And neither of them had a living will.

This previously unpublished account of the majority leader's personal brush with life-ending decisions was assembled from court files, medical records and interviews with family members.
 
Olde Hornet said:
We are paying ---- thats the part that no one talks about. :angry:

http://slate.msn.com/id/2115064/
I agree with you totally, and I have been talking about this ever since Terri situation came to the limelight. Our elected officials, president included are willing to step in and save someone who has no quality of life, but they want to cut off the home care services they the senior citizens have and put the senior citizens in nursing homes who still have a quality of life, instead of letting them remain independent in their homes. And everyone knows that once the senior seniors goes to nursing homes its a matter of time before they die. The cost per day to keep this woman alive is $80,000 per day, and the cost per year to keep a senior citizen at home is roughly $20,000, for the cost of keeping her alive per day you can keep 4 senior citizens at home for a year. Now I would love for our elected officials and president to talk dollars and cents to care for this woman.
 
For all intents and purposes,Terry's husband abandoned her when he took up with another woman.He has been with the other woman for several years now.So,even though they may still be legally married,they haven't been together for quite a while.Is he providing any of Terry's care?
I don't know whether they live in a common law state or not but if so,it seems that the husband has committed bigamy because he has been with the other woman long enough for her to be considered his common law wife.
This is what I think I've read and heard.Is my information correct?
Since he's with another woman,the right thing to do would be to divorce Terry,if that could be done.
 
It seems as though her death is his only outlet to this marriage and it's obvious he doesn't care how it comes about. I could understand if this woman was being kept alive by a respirator but it's a mere feeding tube. Why couldn't they just leave her be? At this rate her blood will be on their hands because what they are doing is murder.
 
I guess her husband is trying to hurry & get to the "...Til death do us part" part. But, he did say that she did not want to live like that, so maybe he thinks he's carrying out her wishes. I just wonder why it took him 15 yrs to comply. :xeye:
 
Feud may be as much over money as principle

Fortitude said:
I guess her husband is trying to hurry & get to the "...Til death do us part" part. But, he did say that she did not want to live like that, so maybe he thinks he's carrying out her wishes. I just wonder why it took him 15 yrs to comply. :xeye:
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=676&e=1&u=/usatoday/20050325/ts_usatoday/feudmaybeasmuchovermoneyasprinciple

............It wasn't always this way, according to a USA TODAY review of voluminous records in the Probate Division of Pinellas County Circuit Court in nearby Clearwater.


Those records show that Michael Schiavo and the Schindlers jointly supervised care for Terri after she collapsed. For the first 16 days and nights that she was hospitalized, Schiavo never left the hospital. Over the next few years, as she was moved from the hospital to a skilled nursing facility, to a nursing home, to Schiavo's home and finally back to a nursing home, Schiavo visited Terri daily.........................................................

........By February 1993, Schiavo had the money from the lawsuit.On Valentine's Day that year, he testified, he was in his wife's nursing home room studying. He wanted to become a nurse so he could care for his wife himself. He had taken Terri to California for experimental treatment. A doctor there had placed a stimulator inside Terri's brain and those of other people in vegetative states to try to stimulate still-living but dormant cells.
According to Schiavo's testimony, the Schindlers came into Terri's room in the nursing home, spoke to their daughter, then turned to him.

"The first words out of my father-in-law's mouth was how much money he was going to get," Schiavo said. "I was, 'What do you mean?' 'Well, you owe me money.' "
 
:cry: I am very sad for terrie`s family . I understand it was her wish not to live that way in vegetative state but, was letting her strave to death the best way to let her die . If it was me in that situation I wouldn`t want to live as vegeta : ble but ,i wouldn`t want to die that way either.
 
This happens every day all over America - people are denied food and water so they can die. The only difference here is that the parents with the help of the media and later politicians ? made it a national story. The parents could not accept the decision of their daughter. A Living Will and less government (politics ? Faux Conservatives) is the moral of this story.
 



Back
Top