FDA Approves HIV Prevention Pill Truvada


southsuburbs

What I Live By...
Here's some info on the drug

http://www.theatlantic.com/health/a...that-can-prevent-90-of-hiv-infections/259798/

Welcome, then, are a trio of studies in the New England Journal of Medicine demonstrating that Truvada, an anti-retroviral drug already on the market, can prevent new HIV infections when taken daily. The findings, which were released in part last year and appear this week in final form, offer hope for men and women -- gay and straight -- who are at high risk for contracting HIV from their partners. "What we're looking at here is a new HIV prevention strategy, an approach that hadn't been tested before," said Jared Baeten, an infectious diseases specialist at the University of Washington's School of Public Health. "By having the medication already in their blood stream and in their cells, by the time they came into contact with virus, it would block the virus from taking hold. It would block them from getting infected."

Baeten's study followed 4,700 "serodiscordant" couples -- in which one member was HIV-positive and the other negative -- in Kenya and Uganda. Previous research had shown the efficacy of Truvada in reducing the risk of the disease among men who have sex with men, and Baeten's team hoped to expand the data to heterosexual partners. In addition to receiving a daily drug -- either Truvada or a placebo -- the HIV-negative subjects received STI testing, AIDS awareness counseling, and access to condoms. At the end of the trial, men and women in the Truvada arm of the study were 75 percent less likely to contract HIV than their untreated counterparts. (That figure, while impressive, is even conservative. It included every subject who was given Truvada, regardless of whether they remembered to take it.)

Later, Baeten went back and isolated just those participants who actually took the drug, as evidenced by their blood work. Their level of protection? Ninety percent.

Here in the United States, clinicians and public health officials are buoyed by the evidence that Truvada is safe and, better yet, effective. In May, an expert panel convened by the Food and Drug Administration formally recommended that Truvada be approved for use as a prophylactic, preventative medication against HIV. (Doctors are already able to prescribe it "off-label" as such, but an annual course can cost upwards of $11,000.) The FDA will make a final ruling in September; if it agrees with the panel, Truvada will be the first drug of its kind.
 
Here's the article about the FDA approving the drug, I know it's backwards. :lol:

http://www.empowher.com/aids-hiv/content/truvada-first-fda-approved-drug-hiv-prevention

Truvada is now approved for pre-exposure prevention for individuals who test negative for HIV. In the past, the drug was used as an antiretroviral for patients that already had HIV. Now, more than ever, there is an increased hope to slow down this epidemic.

This ArticleVote Improved My Health Vote Changed My Life Vote Saved My Life
Truvada is a combination of two anti-HIV medications. It is recommended for use in conjunction with safe sex practices. It should not, however, be used as the sole method of HIV prevention.
 

Click here to visit HBCUSportsShop
Well Truvada is one of the pills I take and keeps me from being infectious. The pill is a mixture of three pills. So that being said if it does work without other medications then this is a breakthrough.

FYI...I've been taking it for close to 15 years and my body has not built up a resistance. Now my only concern is that with HIV medications if they are not taken consistently your body will build a resistance. My question is simple, if a person takes the pill as needed would it continue to work on someone who is not positive?

In short, I'm not convinced.
 
Well Truvada is one of the pills I take and keeps me from being infectious. The pill is a mixture of three pills. So that being said if it does work without other medications then this is a breakthrough.

FYI...I've been taking it for close to 15 years and my body has not built up a resistance. Now my only concern is that with HIV medications if they are not taken consistently your body will build a resistance. My question is simple, if a person takes the pill as needed would it continue to work on someone who is not positive?

In short, I'm not convinced.

The first link I posted goes on and discusses all that's been mentioned.

How people HAVE to take the pill(s) consistently, that when the study was done they realized the low numbers were due to people not taking the pill. As well as concerns that if people don't run a "good quality program" it will form a drug-resistant strain of HIV. I didn't really understand "who" was responsible for running the "good quality program" though.

Also it's not a replacement for safe sex.
 
The first link I posted goes on and discusses all that's been mentioned.

How people HAVE to take the pill(s) consistently, that when the study was done they realized the low numbers were due to people not taking the pill. As well as concerns that if people don't run a "good quality program" it will form a drug-resistant strain of HIV. I didn't really understand "who" was responsible for running the "good quality program" though.

Also it's not a replacement for safe sex.

It will be interesting.
 
http://www.poz.com/articles/hiv_truvada_prep_761_22696.shtml

Check out some of the comments from people who are HIV positive. I clearly understand the side effects, one that I have not is irregular diabetic levels and have been subscribed Metformin which a diabetic drug. I basically have to watch my eating habits as if I was a diabetic. Also, I cannot think of the term but Truvada created blockage and Metformin removes the blockage.
 
The first link I posted goes on and discusses all that's been mentioned.

How people HAVE to take the pill(s) consistently, that when the study was done they realized the low numbers were due to people not taking the pill. As well as concerns that if people don't run a "good quality program" it will form a drug-resistant strain of HIV. I didn't really understand "who" was responsible for running the "good quality program" though.

Also it's not a replacement for safe sex.

That article didn't do a great job of summarizing of the research. In the studies, resistance typically developed in people who had undetected HIV infection at the beginning of the study and/or had specific mutations in the virus genome. Relatively speaking, resistance developed in a very small number of patients. That being said, pretty much all of the studies were performed in 'high-risk' populations, such as people with lots of sexual partners or those with HIV-positive partners. Its effectiveness in people practicing good sexual habits will probably be much lower.
 
That article didn't do a great job of summarizing of the research. In the studies, resistance typically developed in people who had undetected HIV infection at the beginning of the study and/or had specific mutations in the virus genome. Relatively speaking, resistance developed in a very small number of patients. That being said, pretty much all of the studies were performed in 'high-risk' populations, such as people with lots of sexual partners or those with HIV-positive partners. Its effectiveness in people practicing good sexual habits will probably be much lower.

The article stated that the purpose of the pill is for people who live the type of life where they might engage in sexual relationship in "high-risk" areas.

"...offer hope for men and women -- gay and straight -- who are at high risk for contracting HIV from their partners"

"By having the medication already in their blood stream and in their cells, by the time they came into contact with virus, it would block the virus from taking hold. It would block them from getting infected."
 
That article didn't do a great job of summarizing of the research. In the studies, resistance typically developed in people who had undetected HIV infection at the beginning of the study and/or had specific mutations in the virus genome. Relatively speaking, resistance developed in a very small number of patients. That being said, pretty much all of the studies were performed in 'high-risk' populations, such as people with lots of sexual partners or those with HIV-positive partners. Its effectiveness in people practicing good sexual habits will probably be much lower.

I can agree to an extent because what I was looking for was the treatment that the person infected with HIV was on in relation to the overall study. For instance my HIV is undetectable and CD4 count in over 1,000. I also take Truvada as part of my regimen. So really a study of me and my partner would be considered low given the test. Yet, she is still considered be in a high risk population figure.

I just believe more studies should be done on a wide range of individuals. I also believe there will be some people who believe this will keep them from getting HIV and engage in ricky activities.
 

Click here to visit HBCUSportsShop
Back
Top