Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A lot of women are wary of men to begin with, and understand how vulnerable they are. I'd think they understand that concept very well.
Really?! A lot of women don't understand that concept? How many? Have you taken a poll of female domestic abuse victims and found that most of those women didn't understand that concept? Did you speak with female victims hiding in a shelter from their abuser and found that most of those women didn't understand that concept?!
What number/percentage = "a lot of women"?!
You speaking with your emotions...BTW, go look at the Amber Battle footage, and then come back
You speaking with your emotions...BTW, go look at the Amber Battle footage, and then come back
Kendrick, you make a lot of sense on here at times...and I could be wrong...but I have the feeling you've never seen a woman challenge a man in person
It goes back to their upbringing. I saw a video on YouTube a few months ago of these kids in high school. The girl all up in the guy's face provoking him cussing at him and she eventually started beating the hell out of him.
You're speaking with ignorance...
http://abc7chicago.com/sports/texas-tech-suspends-amber-battle/156843/
Okay...so you mention a case where the woman was the abuser. She was punished. Great. That's what is supposed to happen. What's your point?! :noidea: And it would be wrong for someone to say he provoked Amber. :tup:
I'm not ignorant to think there aren't cases where women are the aggressors and men are the victims. Never said that... I've seen it first hand. I've volunteered. I've done the training. I've listened to the victims share their stories...both men and women. I realize it's a fugged up system all the way around because it doesn't truly protect the victim and it doesn't truly look at men as victims.
But yeah...again...still waiting on those numbers/percentages that back up your asinine statement of "a lot of women"...
I've seen my mom do it back in the day.
However, that doesn't mean a lot of women don't understand the concept of that engaging in physical confrontation could lead to certain negatives outcomes, though.
A lot of cats bristle up and get defensive as it relates to domestic violence because they feel they're being attacked unfairly. But, when you look at the numbers and the studies that indicate black women die due to the violence of men more than anything else or sexual assault and rape numbers that show 70 percent of victims are attacked by someone they know or examine street harassment, you'd see why men are often not given the benefit of the doubt.
And in the majority of these cases women and girls did not provoke a man through violent actions. So, you'd see why women would take umbrage with SAS's comments and the comments made by other men as it relates to this topic. A lot of guys don't understand how vulnerable women and girls are. They just don't.
He still didn't say anything "wrong"...HOWEVER, the interpretation is where people get crossed, and I can understand people being a little miffed about that.
But we, as brothers who have seen women be aggressors in situation in person, knew EXACTLY what Stephen A. Smith
meant. Again, let's look at the Texas Tech(which I JUST saw the video for), this chick threw a punch at the young man, and although he shouldn't have hit her back, she initiated and escalated the situation and got this kid kicked out of school
This is what Stephen A. Smith essentially meant don't provoke or escalate a situation through violent or physical contact on anybody. A lot of women don't understand this concept. Some women truly believe that they can lay hands on any dude and it's ok. The general consensu is that no matter what a woman does physically, she's protected because she's a woman...and with some dudes, that is not the case
Y'all need to listen to SS on this one.
Societies have to respect women folks...they are the cradle of civilization. Take a look at countries that treat their women like **** and see if you'd want to live their.
Just saw a story a couple of nights ago where a woman got shot three times in the face and her nephew (I think) got killed by her ex while she was at a kid's party. What did she do to provoke that?
Stephen needs to work in a battered women's shelter before he starts pontificating on domestic violence.
man, America gets softer and softer each year.
Exactly...my homeboys ex-GF pulled out a knife on me and his roommate a few years ago in two separate incidents when we were in college. But I wouldn've been in jail or labeled a woman beater had I hit her. I walked away from this chick when she was screaming, yelling, poking me in the head an all that good stuff...I walked away...she grabs the sharpest knife she could find and throws it at my back as I'm exiting the apartment...thank God it didn't hit me
Then she threatened to kill his roommate while holding a knife
Not to mention how she would spaz out throw stuff and push my homeboy when she didn't get her way.
Which is why when I say I don't condone violence against women, I mean it, as I was able to control myself, but in these situations, the woman tried to provoke a reaction through violence...but of course people only see the Ike Turner beating Tina situation
What does that mean?
People become more sensitive over certain things and we are seeing overblown public outrage over misconstrued statements. A NFL player was suspended this year because he tweeted out horrible after seeing the Michael Sam kiss.
Understandably so.
I don't see how hard it is for people to understand that there are potential consequences for things you say, especially when you represent an organization or company.
People become more sensitive over certain things and we are seeing overblown public outrage over misconstrued statements. A NFL player was suspended this year because he tweeted out horrible after seeing the Michael Sam kiss.