Conservatives tout anti-Hillary book


Olde Hornet

Well-Known Member
They must be scared she might win. :bump:

http://www.usatoday.com/life/books/news/2005-06-20-hilary-clinton-book_x.htm

Conservatives tout anti-Hillary book
ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) ? Conservative groups are promoting a Hillary Rodham Clinton biography that hits bookstores Tuesday as a work so damning it could destroy any possible bid for the presidency in 2008.
The 305-page book, The Truth About Hillary: What She Knew, When She Knew It, and How Far She'll Go to Become President, by Edward Klein, portrays the New York senator as a ruthless and ambitious woman who would stop at nothing to protect her husband's presidency and promote a Clinton II administration headed by her.

While promotional material from Sentinel books, a conservative imprint launched by the Penguin Group, promises a work that "contains shocking new accounts of key moments in Hillary Clinton's private and political life," the book relies heavily on earlier works about the former first lady.

"She's been written about so frequently that it's impossible not to cover some of the same ground," Klein told The Associated Press in an interview Monday. He said, however, that the book contains plenty of new material and insights.

There are 30 pages of end notes, many of which cite those previous works as grist for Klein's coverage of President Clinton's womanizing, his wife's efforts to save him from the Monica Lewinsky scandal and the prominent role the first lady played during her husband's White House years. Other sources cited by Klein are often anonymous.

The Clinton camp lashed out at the work Monday.

"We don't comment on works of fiction, let alone a book full of blatant and vicious fabrications contrived by someone who writes trash for cash," said Philippe Reines, a spokesman for the senator.

Jim Kennedy, a spokesman for former President Clinton, also called the book "trash."

Will Weisser, Sentinel's associate publisher, said 350,000 copies have been printed.

Such works, according to former Clinton adviser-turned critic Dick Morris, can backfire.

"Personal attacks on Hillary Clinton and her marriage only tend to invigorate her and permit her to characterize all criticism as extreme and personal," wrote Morris in an e-mail exchange with the AP. He added: "These personal shots obscure the more serious questions about her lack of qualifications to be a good president."

To Klein, a former editor of The New York Times Sunday Magazine and author of The Kennedy Curse, Clinton is a sort of latter-day Richard Nixon, constantly reinventing herself.

"The comparison between Hillary Clinton and Richard Nixon can be pushed only so far," Klein writes, however. "Whereas Nixon sought power in large part to overcome his low self-esteem, Hillary seeks power because she has unrealistically high self-esteem."

But Klein does gives her credit, of a sort, for her work in the Senate.

"To the surprise of many, Hillary turned out to be more than equal to the task of winning friends on both sides of the aisle," he writes, before adding: "No one saw the other side of Hillary Clinton's face, which she kept carefully hidden behind a mask of collegiality."

"If you are a fair-minded, balanced journalist, you have to say Hillary has performed brilliantly in the last five years, and that's what makes her such a formidable politician," Klein told the AP.

The author said he expects Clinton to win easy re-election to the Senate next year, to capture the Democratic nomination for president in 2008 and to have "a real shot at winning red states" in the election.

"I think she would be, in the White House, a Nixonian president and a danger to the republic," Klein said.

The work is being touted by, among others, the Conservative Book Club, which is owned by the parent company of Regnery Publishing. Regnery produced Unfit for Command, the book that attacked Sen. John Kerry's Vietnam War service and was written by a leader of the anti-Kerry Swift Boat Veterans.

NewsMax.com, a conservative Web site backed by Clinton critic Richard Mellon Scaife, is offering free copies of the Hillary Rodham Clinton book to those who subscribe to its NewsMax Magazine. NewsMax says "publishing insiders say the book and its revelations could destroy her bid for the presidency in 2008."

An excerpt earlier this month in the July issue of Vanity Fair drew criticism from the liberal-leaning Media Matters group, which said Klein's work contained numerous errors.

Readers will learn from the book, thanks to an interview with fifth-grade boyfriend Jim Yrigoyen, that Clinton can be one tough cookie. The old sweetheart recalled how the young Hillary Rodham had entrusted him with watching over some baby rabbits. He made the mistake of giving one to a neighbor.

"She hauled off and punched me in the nose," Yrigoyen said.

As of Monday, the book was ranked No. 18 in sales on Amazon.com.
 



NASHVILLE, Tenn. Conservative religious leader Reverend Jerry Falwell today credited evangelicals for putting President Bush in office in 2004.

Falwell told the Southern Baptist Convention meeting in Nashville, Tennessee, that the Christian group now has its eye on defeating Hillary Clinton if she runs in the next presidential election.

Falwell said "the church" won the 2004 elections, and the 2008 race poses a bigger challenge.

The 71-year-old Falwell said he was "too old to care or be intimidated" by those who oppose him.

What a coincidence. Jerry Falwell and the "Southern Baptist" just made a vow to defeat Hillary in 2008.
 
This clown is just another nutt trying to make money ..........BUT .......................
This is why HILLARY must NOT be the Demo's choice in 2008. Remember ..............the Repubs only have to "maintain" .............the Demo's are the one's that must overcome and "WIN".

She would have to spend all of her time refighting battles from the 8 years she was first lady. All that nice attitude and fair play will be out the window.

If you don't believe it, ask ole girl that was going to run for Vice President a few years back ...............G Fararow?

Her son got caught with drugs and they tore her arse up.
Hillary Clinton will be like a BIG BLOODY BAG OF CHUM IN A SHARK TANK. Her message ............(whatever that is) .............will never get out of the gate.

Believe me ....................they would start with the "Hillary Care" debacle and go from there.

Just my 2 cents ..............don't put both feet in my arse. :swink: :emlaugh:
 
Whether Hillary runs or not this is going to be a vicious election anyway. So if Hillary is the Dems best candidate(and I'm not saying she is) then she should be the nominee. It would be foolish to let Republicans scare us into nominating an inferior candidate. The fact that the Republicans are so fearful of her potential candidacy should clue u in on something. And its not like the Republicans have any strong candidates on their side either. Bill Frist? Rudy Guiliani? please....
 
Olde Hornet said:
They must be scared she might win. :bump:

Readers will learn from the book, thanks to an interview with fifth-grade boyfriend Jim Yrigoyen, that Clinton can be one tough cookie. The old sweetheart recalled how the young Hillary Rodham had entrusted him with watching over some baby rabbits. He made the mistake of giving one to a neighbor.

"She hauled off and punched me in the nose," Yrigoyen said.

As of Monday, the book was ranked No. 18 in sales on Amazon.com.


Fifth-grade boyfriend come on really :rolleyes:. You all don't want to play with HRC
 
JSU/99 said:
Whether Hillary runs or not this is going to be a vicious election anyway. So if Hillary is the Dems best candidate(and I'm not saying she is) then she should be the nominee. It would be foolish to let Republicans scare us into nominating an inferior candidate. The fact that the Republicans are so fearful of her potential candidacy should clue u in on something. And its not like the Republicans have any strong candidates on their side either. Bill Frist? Rudy Guiliani? please....

Co-sign!

Frist...talk about reaching! Can you say Bob Dole '96 all over again? :lol:

Guiliani...what did the white south's favorite poster boy (John Rocker) say about New Yorkers? Many nodded their heads in agreement after that inbred neanderthal made those comments, too!!

Don't let any of these southern backwater rednecks (the bulk of the conservative constituency,) fool you neocons into thinking they would vote for Guiliani...regardless of his political affiliation. Too many of them are still fighting the Civil War, and in their "Gone With the Wind" mindsets, he's "another filthy Yankee scalawag!"
 
JSU/99 said:
Whether Hillary runs or not this is going to be a vicious election anyway. So if Hillary is the Dems best candidate(and I'm not saying she is) then she should be the nominee. It would be foolish to let Republicans scare us into nominating an inferior candidate. The fact that the Republicans are so fearful of her potential candidacy should clue u in on something. And its not like the Republicans have any strong candidates on their side either. Bill Frist? Rudy Guiliani? please....

Co-sign

No matter who our nominee is the Right will fight tooth and nail to defeat them. Does anyone recall how the Right attacked John McCain in the 2000 primaries. I mean they made up some degrading stuff about that man military service and RAN with it to get Bush in office. The Karl Rove political machine will stop at nothing.
 
It?s going to be interesting - Frist is selling his soul to the religious right. McCain can?t win unless he sells his soul and changes his views. He is not a religious conservative. I don?t think Frist will get their support, unless no one else steps up to their plate.

I wonder how long before Americans realize they have a Christian version of the Iranian style goverment.

I do find it funny when I speak to people that are not from the south and they have some southern stereotype about southerners - I always remind them that southerners have run this country and controlled the national agenda for at least the past 40 years
 
staggalee83 said:
This clown is just another nutt trying to make money ..........BUT .......................
This is why HILLARY must NOT be the Demo's choice in 2008. Remember ..............the Repubs only have to "maintain" .............the Demo's are the one's that must overcome and "WIN".

She would have to spend all of her time refighting battles from the 8 years she was first lady. All that nice attitude and fair play will be out the window.

If you don't believe it, ask ole girl that was going to run for Vice President a few years back ...............G Fararow?

Her son got caught with drugs and they tore her arse up.
Hillary Clinton will be like a BIG BLOODY BAG OF CHUM IN A SHARK TANK. Her message ............(whatever that is) .............will never get out of the gate.

Believe me ....................they would start with the "Hillary Care" debacle and go from there.

Just my 2 cents ..............don't put both feet in my arse. :swink: :emlaugh:

83, I know this is a surprise but I co-sign
 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Dogs & Cat's ................Chickens & Foxes are living together in peace today!! :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
 
Killer Bees said:
This book is written by a liberal.

Exactly! If you libs don't think WE want Hillary to get the nod then you are way more lost than I thought you were before.

As I have told you guys too many times to count, this country has only had 2 Democratic presidents elected in the last forty years, and both of them were moderates from the South (Carter and Clinton).

This country didn't elect a liberal male.....what makes you think they will elect a liberal female?

But carry on with your illfated delusions of reclaiming some kind of Clinton Grandeur.
 
Makaho 2.0 said:
Exactly! If you libs don't think WE want Hillary to get the nod then you are way more lost than I thought you were before.

As I have told you guys too many times to count, this country has only had 2 Democratic presidents elected in the last forty years, and both of them were moderates from the South (Carter and Clinton).

This country didn't elect a liberal male.....what makes you think they will elect a liberal female?

But carry on with your illfated delusions of reclaiming some kind of Clinton Grandeur.

Good luck finding a Republican candidate to run against Hillary or whoever. Because as of now, i don't see any. While you're asking about Dems, ask yourself when the last time a Republican senator won the whitehouse.
 
Dude, just because you don't see any that means that no one in "your" opinion is worthy?

Bill Clinton was a Governor, Jimmy Carter was a Governor, George W. Bush was a Governor....you see that "pattern". Again, you can bump your gums all you want in order to gas up Hillary. But if you don't think the GOP is chomping at the bit for her to get the nod then you really don't know politics.

Hilllary has way too many bullseyes and tangents she can be attacked on. This country just kicked a Liberal Male to the curb as a presidential candidate, if you think it will elect a Liberal Female then you are smoking some of dat good stuff.

BTW, here is some info for you. Since the Republican party was formed by Lincolin, there have been more Republican presidents than Democratic presidents. We have had 28 presidents since Lincolin.....18 of them have been Republican! Which is why I keep harping on the Clinton/Carter factor. The Dems won't get back the whitehouse till they go with a moderate Democrat from the South.......period. But the democrat party has been taken over by left wing kooks, so that aint happening.

Again, the Dems will get their azzes handed to them on election day.
 



Makaho 2.0 said:
Dude, just because you don't see any that means that no one in "your" opinion is worthy?

Bill Clinton was a Governor, Jimmy Carter was a Governor, George W. Bush was a Governor....you see that "pattern". Again, you can bump your gums all you want in order to gas up Hillary. But if you don't think the GOP is chomping at the bit for her to get the nod then you really don't know politics.

Hilllary has way too many bullseyes and tangents she can be attacked on. This country just kicked a Liberal Male to the curb as a presidential candidate, if you think it will elect a Liberal Female then you are smoking some of dat good stuff.

BTW, here is some info for you. Since the Republican party was formed by Lincolin, there have been more Republican presidents than Democratic presidents. We have had 28 presidents since Lincolin.....18 of them have been Republican! Which is why I keep harping on the Clinton/Carter factor. The Dems won't get back the whitehouse till they go with a moderate Democrat from the South.......period. But the democrat party has been taken over by left wing kooks, so that aint happening.

Again, the Dems will get their azzes handed to them on election day.

Are you a spin doctor for the Republican party? It's amazing how you take facts and twist them. You provide no insight into your conclusions. Granted their have been 18 outta 28 Republican Presidents, but what you have failed to mention is that both parties have switched roles over time.
 
Bruh, the only spin here is the downward spiral of the Democratic party.
If you want to sit here and claim that I am twisting facts then you go right ahead. Again, no "liberal" in over forty years has been elected to the white house. Why can't you see that. Clinton and Carter were "Conservative Democrats"....which is why they got elected as Governors of Georgia and Arkansas. They were also both Centrists!

Your inability to grasp such a basic concept as this really astounds me.

But go aheah and stay your current course. You guys will get your azzes kicked yet again.

:jump:
 
Makaho 2.0 said:
Bruh, the only spin here is the downward spiral of the Democratic party.
If you want to sit here and claim that I am twisting facts then you go right ahead. Again, no "liberal" in over forty years has been elected to the white house. Why can't you see that. Clinton and Carter were "Conservative Democrats"....which is why they got elected as Governors of Georgia and Arkansas. They were also both Centrists!

Your inability to grasp such a basic concept as this really astounds me.

But go aheah and stay your current course. You guys will get your azzes kicked yet again.

:jump:

Just because a Liberal han't won in over 40 years doesn't mean they won't win. I guess you forgot an ULTRA LIBERAL John Kerry received 48% of the vote.
LIBERALS stand on PRINCIPLE and if that means losing election after election then so be it. People will eventually come around. What do Republicans stand for? Nothing, I know so many Conservatives who are disgusted with this Administration it's unheard of.
 
Just as an FYI, This weekend, College Republican National Convention was held in Arlington, VA, where leaders like Tom Delay and party strategist Grover Norquist spoke. If this is the direction the republican party is heading it won't be long before we are back in office.

During the Leadership Institue session a presenter asked the crowd, "What makes you angry?" The answers:
1. Liberals
2. Hippies
3. Gays
4. Democrats

Eek. Now, if these answers had been "tax hikes" and "abortion", I'd understand because those are policies, but instead, these are people. The students' anger and passion are driven towards negative stereotypes and blatant hatred for various groups of people. And they're enthusiastically encouraged by their leaders.

"The Civil Rights movement destroyed black people's sense of self-respect and their compass for what's right.

- The Civil Rights Movement took the men out of their homes and prevented black people from thinking for themselves. "


"There's no way someone could believe in God and vote Democrat"

:( :smh: :( :smh:
 
Toi,

I detect similar sentiments on this board by some posters. However, this is America and they have the right to hate.

I read Delay's comments. The sad thing, many consider him to be mainstream. Go figure :alicia:
 
JSU*Toi said:
Just as an FYI, This weekend, College Republican National Convention was held in Arlington, VA, where leaders like Tom Delay and party strategist Grover Norquist spoke. If this is the direction the republican party is heading it won't be long before we are back in office.








:( :smh: :( :smh:

Are you serious? Now let that have been some Democratic Congressman attending such a meeting and controversial statements were made. The Right-Wing media would have been all over it. Just look at how they demonized Congresswoman Cynthia McKiney when she 'suggested' that Bush may have been behind 9/11. "WHICH I STILL WOULDN'T RULE OUT"

I tell you, the Right Wingnuts
 
lil_j said:
Are you serious? Now let that have been some Democratic Congressman attending such a meeting and controversial statements were made. The Right-Wing media would have been all over it. Just look at how they demonized Congresswoman Cynthia McKiney when she 'suggested' that Bush may have been behind 9/11. "WHICH I STILL WOULDN'T RULE OUT"

I tell you, the Right Wingnuts

They demonized her because you don't say such a thing without proof. That is something really serious.
 
KB,

Different rules apply to who says what. Rove, Cheney, Limbaugh, DeLay, Falwell, Reed and other right wingers get away with some of the most ridiculous statements. Just look at Durbins and Rove's statements. Durbin is forced to apoligize and Rove, the white house and right wingers basically are saying Phug yall. I don't recall anyone on the left coming out to defend Durbin. Look at the propaganda machine (Fox News/Right Wing Talk Radio) that has come out to qualify what Rove said.

I miss the good old days of the cold war when the right could rally their base around fighting communism. With the end of the Cold war, they had to create new enemies, "Liberals" and others who did not fit their views of americana.

Civililty has gone out the window and there is no leadership to restore that treasured American value. Where is the President on this civility issue. Where are the religious leaders, excluding Billy Graham? It appears religious leaders (Christian Right) are leading the charge by racketing up the divisiveness. Surely Bush recognizes what is happening in our political discourse. We need to turn down the noise and discuss and resolve the major issues facing our society today in a bipartisan manner. Compromise is the engine that drives modern politics.
 
Makaho 2.0 said:
Dude, just because you don't see any that means that no one in "your" opinion is worthy?

Bill Clinton was a Governor, Jimmy Carter was a Governor, George W. Bush was a Governor....you see that "pattern". Again, you can bump your gums all you want in order to gas up Hillary. But if you don't think the GOP is chomping at the bit for her to get the nod then you really don't know politics.

Hilllary has way too many bullseyes and tangents she can be attacked on. This country just kicked a Liberal Male to the curb as a presidential candidate, if you think it will elect a Liberal Female then you are smoking some of dat good stuff.

BTW, here is some info for you. Since the Republican party was formed by Lincolin, there have been more Republican presidents than Democratic presidents. We have had 28 presidents since Lincolin.....18 of them have been Republican! Which is why I keep harping on the Clinton/Carter factor. The Dems won't get back the whitehouse till they go with a moderate Democrat from the South.......period. But the democrat party has been taken over by left wing kooks, so that aint happening.

Again, the Dems will get their azzes handed to them on election day.

Ok let's try it this way: When was the last time a Republican Senator won the presidency? I ask this because all of the leading candidates of today are Senators(except Guiliani). George Pataki would be forminable nationwide, but he' s too moderate to win the Republican nomination. Mitt Romney will turn a lot of Southerners off because he's from Massachusetts. If William Frist, George Allen and John McCain are your top candidates, you're in trouble. All of those guys would lose to Mark Warner or Hillary Clinton.
 
One other thing, Hillary is not as vulnerable to attack as many seem to believe. Most of the stuff against her has been public for more than a decade. Its nothing the public doesn't already know. A lot of conservatives are criticizing the new book for that very reason. If she has momentum after the 06 elections, don't think these rehashed scandals are going to change that. Right now her biggest liabilities are being a female and being a former first lady.
 
Back
Top