Alabama State vs Prairie View A&M: Game Updates - 2:00pm CT


Nothing against PV I enjoyed the Hill yesterday. I'm drinking water to recover right now. With that being said the SWAC needs instant replay it's 2016 sheesh. Get the call right!

Did you see all those younger folks? Mannnnnnnnn....

PV had only one rv on campus yesterday & 1 walmart bbq grill, according to some who is the top tailgater in america. lolololololol
 



The crazy thing about all of this is that wasn't even a call that should have even needed reviewing. Three refs and not even close.
 
They gave us the double whammy in the PV game last year. Not only did they miss a PV player going out of bounds but they miss a whole SU player landing in the end zone.
 
Before I say anything on the refs, on a punt, if the kicking team player downs the ball with a part of his body on the goal line, is it a touchback like the NFL?
Where are you going with this? Scrimmage kick rules are a lot different than regular scrimmage plays.
 
Another thought. I thought replay could be used for games that were televised.
Could be but not required for FCS. They have to determine whether it will be used prior to the game because a replay official would need to be assigned.
 
Where are you going with this? Scrimmage kick rules are a lot different than regular scrimmage plays.

I ask because of what I observed on two other plays. Before I say they got the call wrong, I wanted to know what the rule is. Nothing to do with the other play.
 
I ask because of what I observed on two other plays. Before I say they got the call wrong, I wanted to know what the rule is. Nothing to do with the other play.
Oh ok. Ball has to break the plane in order for it to be a touchback in NCAA
 
I ask because of what I observed on two other plays. Before I say they got the call wrong, I wanted to know what the rule is. Nothing to do with the other play.
According to the broadcasters, as long as no part of the ball touches the endzone it is not a touchback unlike the NFL where if a player's body is in the endzone and he touches the ball it is a touchback.
 
According to the broadcasters, as long as no part of the ball touches the endzone it is not a touchback unlike the NFL where if a player's body is in the endzone and he touches the ball it is a touchback.
Even if it is in the air and crossed the plane
 
No, ASU cost themselves a chance to tie the game since they went 4 and out in OT. PVAMU had 1 st possesion and ASU had the 2nd possesion.



Do you not think PV would have not scored a point even if they had the ball on the 1/2 yard line?

Give it a rest Fiyah, we have had terrible refs and bad calls for years, if the bad call had cost PV the game these same people would say that's just how it goes. Just like our GSU game, the refs didn't just give us all those unanswered points. The refs didn't make one FG or tackle. I acknowledged myself it was a bad call, but if someone says you wouldn't score with 4 downs on the 1/2 yd line is just being a hater and one of those people that hate to see PV win no matter what. This thread is getting ridiculous I'm done
 
Another thought. I thought replay could be used for games that were televised.

All games arn't broadcast the same, as far as equipment and camera angles. There wasn't a single camera view from that side of the field that could have determined where the player was as there is a depth perception that can't be seen.
 



no different than instant replay for hoops, if all you have to have is a monitor and not dictating the correct amount of cameras, angles, it's a waste
 
All games arn't broadcast the same, as far as equipment and camera angles. There wasn't a single camera view from that side of the field that could have determined where the player was as there is a depth perception that can't be seen.
That is not true about camera angle....the replay on TV showed the PV player clearly standing out of bounds when he touched the ball which would have worked in PV's favor had the correct call been made. If he does not touch the ball it most likely goes through the endzone and out of bounds for a touchback and Alabama State ball at the 20.
 
Last edited:
Now knowing the rule, I agree. He put two of em inside the 1.

That last one should have been picked up by the receiver at the 20 yard line and he let it bounce all the way down to the 1. He had ample space to get it and run out of bounds. He has done that on a number of punts this season.
 
All games arn't broadcast the same, as far as equipment and camera angles. There wasn't a single camera view from that side of the field that could have determined where the player was as there is a depth perception that can't be seen.




Screenshot_2016-10-08-23-43-16_zpsoqsgxmq7.png


Screenshot_2016-10-08-23-44-02_zpsa8q0ctsn.png


Screenshot_2016-10-08-23-46-34_zpsij2dzhki.png
 
The video of the play, from the Root Broadcast, is on facebook in one of those SWAC groups, with 2-3 angles. Some of y'all should be ashamed lmao. It's clear as day Bama St was cheated.
 
The video of the play, from the Root Broadcast, is on facebook in one of those SWAC groups, with 2-3 angles. Some of y'all should be ashamed lmao. It's clear as day Bama St was cheated.
Bad call? Yes. Cheated? I don't know. As I have already stated, if the player was called for touching the ball out of bounds the ball should have been placed on the 1 or the half yard line and first and goal PV. The only scenario that would have changed that is if the PV player did not touch the ball and it rolled in and out of the endzone...then it would be AlaSt ball at the 20.
 
I wouldn't call it cheating either. Just a bad call. He was looking at where the ball was initially dropped instead of following the ball and seeing the play. He had already thrown the beanbag so he had the spot.
 
Back
Top