Alabama A&M Athletic Program Placed On NCAA Probation For One Year


Status
Not open for further replies.



We've all been thru issues such as this.

Texas Southern has had more than it's fair share. Just let our VP of Intercollegiate Athletics leave or when our new president comes on board in the coming months and decides to slash our athletic budget (namely positions/salaries) and we'll be right back where we were a few years ago.

This catches up with us (HBCUs) eventually.
 
Everybody is well aware of SU's battle with APR and no good data. We all have to do better. Including my alma mater to stay out of repeating the same mistakes over again. It starts with having competent people. But you have to have competent people hire other competent people.

Good luck AAMU. I am confident you guys will get it fixed.
 
SU never found their data so the NCAA just gave up... Like we said in the case of Missing Data at SU, if you have the data, you will just turn it in. It don't take all this. We knew SU didn't have it... just like AAMU don't have it.

At times like this, I shole miss that rolling :lmao:
 
C-LeB28 said:
We've all been thru issues such as this.

Texas Southern has had more than it's fair share. Just let our VP of Intercollegiate Athletics leave or when our new president comes on board in the coming months and decides to slash our athletic budget (namely positions/salaries) and we'll be right back where we were a few years ago.

This catches up with us (HBCUs) eventually.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry but if that happens our AD should have to go, no way after all we gone through we haven't put a system in place that if there is a budget cut/people cut we don't have a computerize system of some sort in place, more than one person need to know how to do the job damn people it is not that hard!
 
Welp...this seems to be a recurring problem in the swac. It is a black eye on the program. So glad we are not dealing with this right now.
 



jag4life said:
Explain your analogy
Click to expand...

Either they mean the person isn't a member of the fraternity or the person actually pledged before 1990. If he means the latter, there are already orgs with presidents that didn't pledge and eventually all will have one
 
In_The_662 said:
Either they mean the person isn't a member of the fraternity or the person actually pledged before 1990. If he means the latter, there are already orgs with presidents that didn't pledge and eventually all will have one
Click to expand...
Not what I was asking about. LOL Was asking the relevancy to this discussion. Got my answer another way though.
 
Tigerpride said:
Says who? They were yanking SU players off the bus a year later over paperwork...
Click to expand...

Nope. That was due to doing a double check with the new compliance person we hired and they were overly cautious about everything. That's why those players returned. It was almost like a random audit just to make sure after the fiasco under our AD before Broussard. The problem was it was not done in a timely fashion.
 
JR said:
Nope. That was due to doing a double check with the new compliance person we hired and they were overly cautious about everything. That's why those players returned. It was almost like a random audit just to make sure after the fiasco under our AD before Broussard. The problem was it was not done in a timely fashion.
Click to expand...

TP doesn't care about facts LOL
 
All 9 of you need to take 2016-17 off because S.U. will swep easily next year in men's basketball, baseball, track and football. Not one of your schools stand a chance but in gulf and tennis.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top