In my experience, I haven't HAD to, because I have not run across an officer who treats people differently because of their race. I know some officers who are sticklers and hard-asses, but they are tough on anybody, regardless of color. They police whites just as hard as they do blacks and hispanics. And these are both black and white officers. The most I find myself having to do is translate slang. I have never, in my experience, personally seen a situation that would warrant me having to step in and explain perception. Hell, I've run across more Hispanics that hate the police than other races COMBINED. Maybe it's just the area and agency that I'm with (*shrug*) and/or the people I work with.
However, when these situations arise that make national headlines, there are discussions about them amongst officers. In my experiences, officers call a spade a spade, and dislike crooked officers just as much as the public does. Just like I always say, those guys make the job that much harder for the ones that do it with integrity. Unfortunately I don't have a direct line to every officer out there, and I can't (and won't try to) speak for every officer and/or agency out there. I am blessed to work for a diverse agency who does it the right way.
BTW, I also live and work in the same community that I serve. IMO, it has its advantage, but for every advantage, I can come up with an equally strong disadvantage. I know where you are going with that, and there is something to be said for having a vested interest in a community, but there are other factors to consider that doesn't always make it the best idea.
The point I continually make that keeps getting twisted and misconstrued is really very simple. Every encounter with police that goes bad is not the fault of a crooked cop. I am simply tired of people trying everything they can to place blame on law enforcement for tragedies that could have (and would have) been avoided if not for the criminal behavior that INITIATED the contact between person and police. Does that mean the police are automatically justified in any action they take? HELL NO. I'm just saying, for better or worse, the police don't get called just to say hi and shoot the shat. The police get called when people can't handle a problem or situation on their own.
Just like the other thread (which, coincidentally, many of you folks won't touch) from the chase in Houston. Mofo ran for at least 15 minutes at 100mph from the police, crashed into 3 people (1 pretty severely), gets out of the car, reaches back into the car, and is killed by the police....Black guy, and what appeared to be white cops. And you guessed it, the next day on the news, mother is questioning why the police shot an unarmed man, instead of staying in their cars and "running demands".....With all that is going on, we are quick to deflect from our own criminal actions to blame someone. All I'm saying is that wrong is wrong, PERIOD. It has no color, it has no profession, none of that. WRONG is WRONG.
Is that enough of an answer?