photoguy1906
New Member
That's a Swac issue.
Its Sharp, wanting to maximize revenue.... but it looks bad... but think about what kind of tournament this wouldve been without Southern....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's a Swac issue.
Think about what it would've looked like had either su team won. Thank goodness they didn't.Its Sharp, wanting to maximize revenue.... but it looks bad... but think about what kind of tournament this wouldve been without Southern....
Think about what it would've looked like had su won.
Dude, this question was asked before the tournament began.Folks only complaining because both our teams made it to the finals, with the men coming very close to winning.
Dude, this question was asked before the tournament began.
So the 1-game suspension was in fact just for the SWAC tournament which won't have to be served because they pulled out of the SWAC tournament right?TSU AD Confirmed that the TXSO WBB accepted WNIT Invitation! Will find out who they will play on Monday
Dude, ESPN made a big deal out of it and rightly so. It would've given the SWAC a black eye had either su team won. su has given the SWAC enough black eyes lately. No pun intended.That question was already answered. The team that advanced to play us in the final would get the auto-bid. Everyone already knew that, so why are you making a big deal about it now?
And JSU was nowhere to be found in either game.0 for 2 in one day. Oh well.
Yet I don't see ESPN making a big deal about North Carolina still being allowed to play despite clear academic fraud involving athletes at their school. hmm.......Dude, ESPN made a big deal out of it and rightly so. It would've given the SWAC a black eye had either su team won. su has given the SWAC enough black eyes lately. No pun intended.
Have they been officially banned like su? No. Even Syracuse had the sense to sit out of the tournament since they were banned.Yet I don't see ESPN making a big deal about North Carolina still being allowed to play despite clear academic fraud involving athletes at their school. hmm.......
So the 1-game suspension was in fact just for the SWAC tournament which won't have to be served because they pulled out of the SWAC tournament right?
TSU AD Confirmed that the TXSO WBB accepted WNIT Invitation! Will find out who they will play on Monday
So the 1-game suspension was in fact just for the SWAC tournament which won't have to be served because they pulled out of the SWAC tournament right?
Correct, they served their suspension during the Tournament, due to the suspensions they could not field a team...
SMH....no penalty at all...
They didn't even serve a suspension
No, they withdrew from the tournament before any games was played. That's not serving a 1 game penalty for any of the players. They just skirted the rules and the Swac is in with them doing it.
Think about what it would've looked like had either su team won. Thank goodness they didn't.
The league informed TSU how many players that was going to be suspended, TSU comes out and said we withdraw from the Tournament because we do not have the players, hence they served their suspension... Now I dont know why the SWAC reseeded the WBB side... but TSU did serve they suspension... Do you think the Lady Tigers of Texas Southern wanted to withdraw, they were the best team in the SWAC all season long, and flew through conference play. They withdrew because their players were suspended...
Technically they did serve a suspension. They didn't play the game they were scheduled to play. In fact, TSU went above and beyond the suspension by having all of their players suspended for at least one game. One can even say that they suspended themselves for multiple games, i.e., the games they had the potential of winning had they not voluntarily sat out.The league informed TSU how many players that was going to be suspended, TSU comes out and said we withdraw from the Tournament because we do not have the players, hence they served their suspension... Now I dont know why the SWAC reseeded the WBB side... but TSU did serve they suspension... Do you think the Lady Tigers of Texas Southern wanted to withdraw, they were the best team in the SWAC all season long, and flew through conference play. They withdrew because their players were suspended...
Congrats tSU
started what. That was just a stupid azz play by Trelyn
They got rewarded for withdrawing from the tournament. They still didn't serve a suspension.
Sure didn't. The rule is that they are suspended for their next game. The withdrawal from the tourney does not constitute having a game. I think a few other folks said they should have just accepted a forfeit in the tourney to make sure the suspensions were served (technically).They got rewarded for withdrawing from the tournament. They still didn't serve a suspension.
It's the presidents wanting to maximize revenue. They voted to allow it last season.Its Sharp, wanting to maximize revenue.... but it looks bad... but think about what kind of tournament this wouldve been without Southern....
Sure didn't. The rule is that they are suspended for their next game. The withdrawal from the tourney does not constitute having a game. I think a few other folks said they should have just accepted a forfeit in the tourney to make sure the suspensions were served (technically).