the call to expand the playoffs to eight teams has begun


That's the only reason I was cool with the BCS.... Humans have emotions..... and agendas...... computers don't........


Yep. The BCS did its purpose which was pick the best two teams. Bama or MSU has to go into the SEC title game with 1 loss or you will hear the SEC bias talk when 1 loss OSU, TCU or Baylor is on the outside looking in
 



Computers are programmed by humans, though.

Yeah, with a formula that's not to be tweaked. Computers can't change their minds after the fact like humans. Humans give pity points to hurt qb's, injuries, etc..... Computers don't give two cents about that. Like your Ohio St. argument. Computers don't care that Braxton Miller was hurt and that's why they lost to Va. Tech..... It just sees a bad loss. Period.
 
Yeah, with a formula that's not to be tweaked. Computers can't change their minds after the fact like humans. Humans give pity points to hurt qb's, injuries, etc..... Computers don't give two cents about that. Like your Ohio St. argument. Computers don't care that Braxton Miller was hurt and that's why they lost to Va. Tech..... It just sees a bad loss. Period.

And you do realize that the formula HAD been tweaked over the years, right?
 
Because the formula was alright... It took into account all body of work, not this "week to week" theory that the committee is doing. That's what I don't like. Computers don't make excuses, like "we only lost to Va tech because our qb got hurt and our backup was new" or "we should be higher than Baylor even though Baylor beat us straight up".

Bottom Line, the BCS computer rankings should have decided the 4 teams in the playoffs.....
 
Body of work has to include factors like injures because that impacts games. You can't ignore that.

And it's not like we're talking about a bunch of juggernauts here. No team is that much better than the next to be complaining about this system. We can guess and speculate, but nobody knows. They just don't. And computers wouldn't solve the problem either.
 
I dont agree with the power 5 conference champions getting automatic bids, but I believe thats the way it will go.

If you look at the way the power conferences manipulated March Madness, to make sure they get the money, this will go the same way, the road map has already been laid.
 
And you do realize that the formula HAD been tweaked over the years, right?

All formulas have to be tweeked over the years. Even Einstein's formula's. :smh: I'm sure it only gets tweeked in the beginning. Everything man creates has to be tweeked.
 
Funny how so many of YOU ALL wanted this playoff, now... :lmao:

I think that MOST people expected the BCS rankings to be used.... not some college playoff committee to be put in place.
 
Funny how so many of YOU ALL wanted this playoff, now... :lmao:

I think that MOST people expected the BCS rankings to be used.... not some college playoff committee to be put in place.

That was what I thought.... not Condi rice on a panel....

TP.... who would the precision poll send if it was calibrated for the playoff? (This is not smack Cause I don't post on there)
 
They keep this up, these playoff games will be going on into the first weekend in Feb.----Super Bowl Sunday. :sick:
 



I dont agree with the power 5 conference champions getting automatic bids, but I believe thats the way it will go.

If you look at the way the power conferences manipulated March Madness, to make sure they get the money, this will go the same way, the road map has already been laid.

From 64 to 68 to appease the #65-68 teams in the country. They want the same convo liike college football is having now (everyone is talking about it. They are talking about doing a similar power ranking in college basketball) but can't do it because the season is too long.
 
Tigerpride said:
Funny how so many of YOU ALL wanted this playoff, now... :lmao:

TP, I told them that very same thing MONTHS ago.

I also told everybody that having a playoff meant you would have to beat Bama TWICE . . . and maybe even three times :lol: in some years, to win a championship. There is still a chance that Bama could even lose the Iron Bowl, win the SEC Championship, end up with two losses, and still be in the top four (depending on how some other teams do) . . . and like I just said, in this scenario, you'd have to beat Bama three times to keep them from being champs . . . y'all sure you still want this playoff? :lol:
 
should have been 8 to begin with to placate the schools that's gone get put out first anyway and are just happy to be in the mix.

When it goes to 8, they gonna want 16... It will never end. The BCS did a GREAT job at predicting the top two teams in the nation and of that TWO, the BEST team always got to play for the championship. This playoff schitt is too political and it opened a can of worms. Who told them to get a committee anyway? That came out of nowhere.
 
When it goes to 8, they gonna want 16... It will never end. The BCS did a GREAT job at predicting the top two teams in the nation and of that TWO, the BEST team always got to play for the championship. This playoff schitt is too political and it opened a can of worms. Who told them to get a committee anyway? That came out of nowhere.

You do know that 1/3 of the BCS formula was the Harris poll -- a panel made up of 105 voters, right?

Shoot, 2/3 of the BCS formula was human.
 
So what's your suggestion???

Conference championships get automatic bid; five other teams will be selected as "wild cards" at-large bids by a small committee much like the NCAA Tournament committee to create a 16-team playoff.

This is based on the model presented in the book "Death to the BCS."


1260176065.jpg
 
Back
Top