Black feminism is a disease that must be stopped


@SU, Founder, bighead....TRADITIONALLY which is biblically based, the Male provides and the woman takes what what he provides and maintains the home. If she isn't working, Is it really traditional? Or just quasi-traditional picking and choosing? Yeah. I had one of those quasi-traditional marriages like you describe, got things in correct order too.

@founder PLEASE take it personal cause I know I do. I'm sick of black men calling black women out if their names when it's something they don't like. Sick of all the old Negro myths that get tossed out to try to shut down disussions, get tired of the constant "dog whistles" that get brought up That don't further us...and tomorrow another irk up a dude's ass and we are back to scapegoating black women for all the ills in our community.
 
Last edited:
From what I'm seeing, y'all blanket label any black wo.an with a differing opinion a feminist, true definition be damned.
@Found, yes there are many unhappy people in this world...I'd say you have good candidates on this forum from the constant chronic topics posted.
 
Last edited:



chocalate_topaz said:
@SU, Founder, bighead....TRADITIONALLY which is biblically based, the Male provides and the woman takes what what he provides and maintains the home. If she isn't working, Is it really traditional? Or just quasi-traditional picking and choosing? Yeah. I had one of those quasi-traditional marriages like you describe, got things in correct order too.

@founder PLEASE take it personal cause I know I do. I'm sick of black men calling black women out if their names when it's something they don't like. Sick of all the old Negro myths that get tossed out to try to shut down disussions, get tired of the constant "dog whistles" that get brought up That don't further us...and tomorrow another irk up a dude's ass and we are back to scapegoating black women for all the ills in our community.
Click to expand...

CT what are you saying to black women? I mean in a serious discussion. I live by example. That's the thing. I have seen many black feminist speak this women empowerment but screwing married men. Heck I even brought to one of their attention and she was so ashamed that she doesn't even post on Instragram anymore because she felt like hypocrite. She still is trying to figure out how I knew about their meeting spot.
 
Bighead said:
I'm not going to get into the other so call bills that these women expect the man to pay. Like I said, women who yelling that dumb sh1t aint never had sh1t or been with someone with sh1t.

Just stupid.

A man pay all the bills, bih, I don't play for the Pelicans or Saints,


It's time for the dumb sh1t to be addressed
Click to expand...

Now what I've noticed is- and I could be wrong, but this is just my observations on social media- but what I've noticed is that most Black feminist oftentimes tend to be lesbians. So they have very little invested in Black men (or men in general). It would be interesting to delve into that. Maybe their lack of sexual interest in a Black man makes it convenient for them to attack; maybe there's some jealousy of not being able to actually be a Black man. Every brotha in here can tell you that there's an interesting dynamic to being a "well-dressed brother in a room full of others". And I'm not talking about these dummies walking around with their pants hanging down....I'm talking about a clean-cut Black man that's about his business; the ones who are a real threat to the institution of White supremacy. I've had white male friends tell me that they're somewhat envious of that in an odd way. There's power in it. We get noticed. Maybe some of these Black feminists want that for themselves, because I know that our professional female counterparts have a different, much more negative experience in the workplace. They get hated on like no other.

I could be way out in left field, but there's gotta be something more to it. CT sympathizes with them and makes blanket statements that attack Black men, and in the same breath acknowledges that we are "near extinction" (which is BS, btw). So why attack a population that's near extinction? I'm just trying to wrap my head around it, and I've concluded that on a subconscious level, maybe these women and sympathizers they want to take the place of Black men. Or maybe it's not meant for me to understand. LOL
 
The Founder said:
CT what are you saying to black women? I mean in a serious discussion. I live by example. That's the thing. I have seen many black feminist speak this women empowerment but screwing married men. Heck I even brought to one of their attention and she was so ashamed that she doesn't even post on Instragram anymore because she felt like hypocrite. She still is trying to figure out how I knew about their meeting spot.
Click to expand...
You are blanketing again...You know ONE person who is cheating and she isn't ALL feminist. Hell, I live by example and hypocrisy doesn't seem to stop many from posting.
 
LS Syndicate said:
Now what I've noticed is- and I could be wrong, but this is just my observations on social media- but what I've noticed is that most Black feminist oftentimes tend to be lesbians. So they have very little invested in Black men (or men in general). It would be interesting to delve into that. Maybe their lack of sexual interest in a Black man makes it convenient for them to attack; maybe there's some jealousy of not being able to actually be a Black man. Every brotha in here can tell you that there's an interesting dynamic to being a "well-dressed brother in a room full of others". And I'm not talking about these dummies walking around with their pants hanging down....I'm talking about a clean-cut Black man that's about his business; the ones who are a real threat to the institution of White supremacy. I've had white male friends tell me that they're somewhat envious of that in an odd way. There's power in it. We get noticed. Maybe some of these Black feminists want that for themselves, because I know that our professional female counterparts have a different, much more negative experience in the workplace. They get hated on like no other.

I could be way out in left field, but there's gotta be something more to it. CT sympathizes with them and makes blanket statements that attack Black men, and in the same breath acknowledges that we are "near extinction" (which is BS, btw). So why attack a population that's near extinction? I'm just trying to wrap my head around it, and I've concluded that on a subconscious level, maybe these women and sympathizers they want to take the place of Black men. Or maybe it's not meant for me to understand. LOL
Click to expand...

No, y'all are near extinction but you are being extincting in broad daylight with little repercussions, whether it be police or others.

I keep hearing that black women/feminist want to be men. I don't see that. I have stated this clearly and plainly many times before: They want to be heard.

Black men are powerful. Black men + black women are more powerful. We can't seem too consistently get to Black squared.

Okay, you have some women bashing men...AND you have just as many men bashing women. BOTH sides mad about it.

Tell me, how many men bashing topics have I started on this board? How many were started by other women?

How many women bashing topics have been started on this board by men?

How many white women are winning/bae/promoting topics have been started by black women on this board?

How many white women are winning/bae/promoting topics have been started by black men on this board?
 
chocalate_topaz said:
@SU, Founder, bighead....TRADITIONALLY which is biblically based, the Male provides and the woman takes what what he provides and maintains the home. If she isn't working, Is it really traditional? Or just quasi-traditional picking and choosing? Yeah. I had one of those quasi-traditional marriages like you describe, got things in correct order too..
Click to expand...

That's not true at all.

The Bible clearly defines what is A VIRTUOUS WOMAN (and thus a good wife). In my opinion, it is one of the most beautiful passages in the Bible. That woman is a businesswoman and an investor. She's industrious and conscientious. She is most definitely concerned about not only providing for the general well-being of her family, but providing for, protecting, and growing the financial strength of her family also.

At no point in that passage does it say she sits back, waits for her husband to make all of the money, then determines how to maintain the house. That definition of "traditional marriage" was provided to you by the same people who told you that you were a "feminist".

I think it's time that we stop letting people outside our community define us. Tell us how our marriages and our community should work. Especially when we know they have a vested interest in destroying us, our families, and our communities. When we know they have actively been destroying us, our families, and our communities for their own selfish and greedy reasons throughout the history of this country.
 
Last edited:
Role of the Husband in the Bible – Provider and Protector
The role of the husband in the Bible starts with leadership, but encompasses provision and protection. A husband will never influence his wife if he does not care for her. He can demand and she may follow as a result, but he will never truly have her heart unless he provides for her needs, cares for her well-being, and protects her both physically and spiritually. For as Scripture says:


  • "Anyone who does not provide for their relatives, and especially for their own household, has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever” (1 Timothy 5:8).

    “Husbands, love your wives and do not be harsh with them” (Colossians 3:19).

    “Husbands, in the same way be considerate as you live with your wives, and treat them with respect as the weaker partner and as heirs with you of the gracious gift of life, so that nothing will hinder your prayers” (1 Peter 3:7).
God loves His daughters and the children they bear. When He gives one of His daughters to a man, He desires that the man cares for her. In no place does Scripture teach or endorse that women and children be considered second rate or inferior to men. Instead, He finds them so precious that He asks for special care to be given them; a care that only biblically-based men can provide. Women are very capable of taking care of themselves. However, God did make men and women different and thus due to the physical nature and strength God gave men, He has charged them with the provision and protection of their families.

The physical nature and strength of a man is to be managed with grace and gentleness. God did not create men to lord over women nor did he create women to simply wait on men. He made them both to complement each other through healthy companionship.
 
chocalate_topaz said:
No, y'all are near extinction but you are being extincting in broad daylight with little repercussions, whether it be police or others.

I keep hearing that black women/feminist want to be men. I don't see that. I have stated this clearly and plainly many times before: They want to be heard.

Black men are powerful. Black men + black women are more powerful. We can't seem too consistently get to Black squared.

Okay, you have some women bashing men...AND you have just as many men bashing women. BOTH sides mad about it.

Tell me, how many men bashing topics have I started on this board? How many were started by other women?

How many women bashing topics have been started on this board by men?

How many white women are winning/bae/promoting topics have been started by black women on this board?

How many white women are winning/bae/promoting topics have been started by black men on this board?
Click to expand...
I’d like to see the data on these so-called extinction theories. Everyone keeps saying that with no statistical data to support it. No census records or nothing. Now if you want to discuss Black men being removed from society by way of the private prison industry, you may have a point.

As far as Black men bashing women and so forth, I can’t speak to that because I don’t do it. But unlike you, I’m not going to sympathize and support that behavior and write them off as “being unheard” or “misunderstood”. Last I checked we are all Black. And last I checked, we are all unheard. You should hold both parties equally accountable for supporting each other.
 
Come on, CT. You're smarter than this.

That's what is so frustrating about this whole discussion. I know you're smart. I also know you're hard working.

Yes, husbands are to care for their wives. Financially and otherwise. Men are instructed to care for a lot of things - financially and otherwise. His family, the Church, the poor, fatherless, widows, and more. We have a lot of responsibility.

However, that mandate to care for his wife and family does not mean he's to be the sole breadwinner. When you take scripture directed toward both men and women together, it is clear that they are both meant to work TOGETHER for the greatest well-being of the family unit. How that is done varies from couple to couple. In some families, it may be best that the man is the sole breadwinner but that does not mean it is the standard for all traditional marriages.
 
Last edited:



@chocolate_topaz, you do take you blood pressure medicine before you click on this thread, right??? LOL!!! Just kidding. LOL!!! There is nothing like good old fashion healthy conversation.
 
Noticed how Black men and women have suddenly stopped rallying for Stephon Clark? Probably because of those negative tweets he made about Black women. On an aggregate level, we are protective of our women. But there is no news about that. Nope. All the are talking about is Fabolous beating on his baby momma.
 
LS Syndicate said:
I’d like to see the data on these so-called extinction theories. Everyone keeps saying that with no statistical data to support it. No census records or nothing. Now if you want to discuss Black men being removed from society by way of the private prison industry, you may have a point.

As far as Black men bashing women and so forth, I can’t speak to that because I don’t do it. But unlike you, I’m not going to sympathize and support that behavior and write them off as “being unheard” or “misunderstood”. Last I checked we are all Black. And last I checked, we are all unheard. You should hold both parties equally accountable for supporting each other.
Click to expand...

That's something I've mentioned on here a few times about her. She will never hold the women like the porn star therapist or those of her ilk accountable for being more harm than good to our community. We black men have to be held responsible for all our bad apples but black women like her never want to hold theirs accountable or speak negatively of them and will chastise you if you do it

As far as Stephon Clark is concerned, I got banned from Facebook the day that about 10 of my friends on there went on an epic Stephon Clark rant saying "F him" and "let his Asian queens march for him" because of his negative remarks about black women. I would have blocked all of them because they are no more down for the overall cause than Rachel Dolezal. You take comments from a few years ago and use it to justify 20 shots while being unarmed.
 
In_The_662 said:
That's something I've mentioned on here a few times about her. She will never hold the women like the porn star therapist or those of her ilk accountable for being more harm than good to our community. We black men have to be held responsible for all our bad apples but black women like her never want to hold theirs accountable or speak negatively of them and will chastise you if you do it

As far as Stephon Clark is concerned, I got banned from Facebook the day that about 10 of my friends on there went on an epic Stephon Clark rant saying "F him" and "let his Asian queens march for him" because of his negative remarks about black women. I would have blocked all of them because they are no more down for the overall cause than Rachel Dolezal. You take comments from a few years ago and use it to justify 20 shots while being unarmed.
Click to expand...
No one has said he deserved what happened. But it is difficult to rally for someone who thought very little of the people that are rallying for him. I take into account that he was 17 or 18 at the time, and we all say some dumb stuff, but you can be “down for the cause” and not hashtag his name. And that funeral was a dog and pony show. Someone needs to tell Stephon’s brother to sit his ass down somewhere.
 
chocalate_topaz said:
You are blanketing again...You know ONE person who is cheating and she isn't ALL feminist. Hell, I live by example and hypocrisy doesn't seem to stop many from posting.
Click to expand...

No CT that was one example. I know a LARGE number of them and the mess is sickening and you take up for it which horrible as well.

Look at the women who post these feminist pieces....how many are married? That says a lot about their experiences and current lifestyle when it comes to relationships.

These women are unhappy with what they see in the mirror. You know it but don't want to admit it.
 
LS Syndicate said:
Noticed how Black men and women have suddenly stopped rallying for Stephon Clark? Probably because of those negative tweets he made about Black women. On an aggregate level, we are protective of our women. But there is no news about that. Nope. All the are talking about is Fabolous beating on his baby momma.
Click to expand...

We are very protective of our women. Yet, what concerns me is that these feminist don't think so.
 
LS Syndicate said:
No one has said he deserved what happened. But it is difficult to rally for someone who thought very little of the people that are rallying for him. I take into account that he was 17 or 18 at the time, and we all say some dumb stuff, but you can be “down for the cause” and not hashtag his name. And that funeral was a dog and pony show. Someone needs to tell Stephon’s brother to sit his ass down somewhere.
Click to expand...

And he won't be here to make it to see 23 because of trigger happy cops to answer for them. Then again if he wasn't killed, we probably wouldn't have know about them. Let's not do the same thing that non-white people do when they drag the names of dead black people through the mud to justify killing them. When you do a Google search for Stephon Clark, "stephon clark tweets" is the first thing that shows up after his name.

We can be our own worst enemy

And yeah his brother is a clown
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top