Grambling vs Mississippi Valley State : Game Updates - 6:30pm CT


Status
Not open for further replies.
Please explain this with facts. We have 2 QBs that have proven they are winners this season. If you look at our seasonal wins other teams have stayed in close proximity because of a moble QB. Once our defense adjusted they were done. Furthermore, last night and Alcorn showed how we feel about QBs.....you leave that pocket and use your less we will put a beating on your body.

So back to the question...please explain.
Different scheme different team. Football is a game of match ups and SU matches up really well with GSU.
 



You keep harping on the fact that they are top 5 defenses... even still Norfolk's offense IS horrible. BCU's offense wasn't as bad but they made mistakes. Neither team has a real FCS QB... at least neither put one on the field last night.

It's not that hard to be a top rated defense when the conference your team plays in is horrible on offense... and in Norfolk's case you haven't even played the best offense in that conference.

Like I said, you need to read my post. I already stated that NSU offense was garbage. But there defense is good. BCC defense is good as well. Say what ya'll want about both teams, but the fact is that both defenses are good and a low scoring game was expected.
 
Hell the New Yorks Jets were a #1/#2 defense in the NFL last year so what's your point?

At the end of the day, that was a putrid display of football. I know you're a little defensive because gram lost to them, but trying to defend that hot mess isn't going to make your team any better.

All it shows is that gram is one dimensional and how ever goes the qb so goes gram.


Y'all in trouble come Nov.

At the end of the day, you saw two teams that have proven that they have good defenses. In fact, you saw two teams that would be successful in the SWAC.

Please keep believing that we are one dimensional. Ya'll thought the same thing in 2005 after Valley gave us a tough game. One game is one game, another is another. We could easily say that Alcorn showed us the way to expose SU. However, we know that means nothing come BC time.


SU's azz is ours come Nov 29.
 
At the end of the day, you saw two teams that have proven that they have good defenses. In fact, you saw two teams that would be successful in the SWAC.

Please keep believing that we are one dimensional. Ya'll thought the same thing in 2005 after Valley gave us a tough game. One game is one game, another is another. We could easily say that Alcorn showed us the way to expose SU. However, we know that means nothing come BC time.


SU's azz is ours come Nov 29.

Y'all ain't thought squat, but if that give you solice....roll with it.
 
Like I said, you need to read my post. I already stated that NSU offense was garbage. But there defense is good. BCC defense is good as well. Say what ya'll want about both teams, but the fact is that both defenses are good and a low scoring game was expected.

Yeah man they are highly rated defenses... never disputed that fact. The game being low scoring isn't the issue. Did you WATCH the teams though? That LSU-Bama 9-6 game had more offense than this.
 
Huh? You said Grambling is one dimensional. Are you referring to the QB being one dimensional? The offense being one dimensional? What? And what is the dimension?

UAPB offensive philosophy with better coaching but not as good a QB (no slight on J. Williams though).
 



So these folks made that we have a quarterback that can make things happen. Keep in mind we have Johnson also.:read:
 
Seems like yall hating because Williams makes things happens, lol. Real Talk I don't know who's the quarterback at SU. No smack.
 
Last edited:
They don't know what they are saying. We run, we pass lol. They are just simply hating and need to focus on Texas Southern lol

Naw...J4L and BD are good peeps. They are not the hatin' type. They are just giving their assessment on how they see things.

Johnathan Williams. LOL

OK, Cool. And that is what I was thinking BD was saying too. And to that, I say what lilrj said. Don't just focus on Williams. Keep in mind, Williams was the 3rd string QB when the season started. When Fobbs made the comment at the beginning of the season that any of our QBs could be the starter, he wasn't lying. S. Johnson had secured the starting position. He was balling. Just ask the J-State folks. He, unfortunately, lost the starting spot due to injury. DJ got injured in the PV game and then J. Williams comes in and takes over.

But make no mistake about, we can run with our RBs if we need to. My only criticism is that we don't run enough at times, but it certainly isn't because a team has stopped us from running.

I'm just saying.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top